Profit.co vs Teamflect: Which is better in 2026?

The OKR software market has split into two camps: standalone strategy platforms that aim to cover everything, and ecosystem-native tools that embed goal tracking inside collaboration apps.

Profit.co and Teamflect represent opposite ends of that spectrum.

Profit.co brings its own web application, mobile apps, and 100+ connectors, while Teamflect lives entirely inside Microsoft Teams and Outlook.

Choosing between them means deciding whether your organization values platform depth or workflow proximity.

I tested both platforms to map their strengths and blind spots across seven categories, plus a bonus pick for teams that outgrow either option.

What's new in Profit.co?

Profit.co's January 2026 release focused on governance and financial visibility. Department-level visibility settings now let admins enforce consistent access rules on every new OKR created within a department, reducing manual permission management.

Risk and issues tracking at the key result level brings project-style risk registers into the OKR workflow. The update also introduced a dual-license tier model offering full-access and read-only seats, which helps organizations give stakeholders visibility without inflating per-seat costs.

What's new in Teamflect?

Teamflect's January 2026 updates centered on standardization and in-app assistance. Preset goal templates let admins lock down title formats and measurement logic so teams create consistent goals without manual oversight.

A new AI assistant button gives every user one-click access to Teamflect's AI agent for HR and policy questions drawn from the company intranet. Collapsible review sections round out the release, letting administrators control whether review blocks appear expanded or collapsed by default.

Profit.co vs Teamflect — in a nutshell

Profit.co is built as an independent strategy command center, housing OKRs, performance management, portfolio tracking, and balanced scorecards under one roof. Teamflect takes the opposite approach, embedding goals, reviews, feedback, and recognition inside the Microsoft Teams sidebar so employees never open a separate app.

The practical difference comes down to your organization's tech identity. Profit.co provides the broader canvas for teams that operate across multiple tools, while Teamflect removes the barrier of yet another login for organizations where Microsoft 365 is the digital headquarters.

Below is a side-by-side snapshot covering both platforms and Mooncamp (included as a third reference point for teams exploring alternatives).

Teamflect's free tier gives it the pricing edge

Profit.co structures its pricing around modules. Organizations select the capabilities they need (OKRs and task management, performance management, project portfolio management, balanced scorecard) and receive a tailored quote after a demo call.

Add-ons such as strategy roadmaps, 1-on-1 meetings, and rewards are priced separately.

A free Launch plan exists for teams exploring the OKR methodology, but it functions more as a sandbox than a production environment. I found the lack of published pricing made it difficult to benchmark Profit.co against competitors before committing to a sales conversation.

Enterprise rates are available for bundled purchases and on-premises deployments. Third-party sources have cited a Growth plan around $9.00 per user per month, but the official pricing page now directs visitors to request a personalized quote.

Profit.co subscription plans

Teamflect publishes its pricing openly with three tiers. The Starter plan is free for up to 10 users and includes the full feature set: goals, reviews, feedback, recognition, surveys, meetings, and tasks, with no feature gating or time limit.

The Essential plan at $7.00 per user per month (annual) adds the AI agent with limited usage, data export, usage analytics, and a dedicated customer success manager. The Professional plan at $11.00 per user per month (annual) unlocks unlimited AI, HRIS integration with 200+ platforms, API access, succession planning, and Power BI report creation.

Every paid plan includes implementation, training, and ongoing support at no additional cost. Nonprofits can receive up to 60% off annual contracts.

Teamflect subscription plans

Teamflect offers better cost predictability from the start. Published pricing, a functional free tier, and included onboarding make budgeting straightforward, while Profit.co's module-based model requires significantly more upfront effort to evaluate.

Teamflect's embedded experience beats Profit.co's standalone UI for daily use

Profit.co runs as a standalone web application where every major business function gets its own section in the left-rail navigation. The sheer number of entry points — goal tracking, task management, meeting agendas, reviews, recognition programs, surveys — makes the first login feel more like opening an enterprise ERP than an OKR tool.

Within the OKR section alone, eight visualization modes (list, Gantt, heatmap, alignment tree, hierarchy, scorecard, progress, table) let different roles examine the same data through different lenses. The trade-off is discoverability: finding a specific report or configuration option often means hunting through nested sub-menus rather than landing on it intuitively.

Mobile apps for Android, iOS, and Windows extend access beyond the desktop. For organizations that need a centralized command center with multiple visualization modes, the interface rewards the initial investment in learning.

Teamflect renders its entire feature set inside Microsoft Teams and Outlook. Modules like Goals, Reviews, Feedback, Recognition, Surveys, Meetings, and Tasks appear in the Teams sidebar, and employees interact with them the same way they would with any other Teams app.

The adoption advantage is immediate: there is no separate URL to bookmark, no new credentials to manage, and no unfamiliar navigation patterns to learn. I found that the embedded experience made quick goal updates feel like a natural part of daily communication rather than a context switch.

The trade-off is screen real estate. Teams panels are narrower than a full-screen web app, which limits how much information can be displayed at once and makes complex goal hierarchies feel cramped.

Profit.co delivers enterprise-grade goal management that Teamflect cannot match

Profit.co treats goal management as its flagship capability. Organizations can cascade OKRs across corporate, department, team, and individual levels with seven distinct key result measurement types, a library of 400+ preloaded KPIs, and AI-assisted authoring that suggests objectives based on organizational context.

The platform also supports Balanced Scorecard methodology alongside OKRs, giving organizations that operate across both frameworks a single home. Strategy roadmaps connect long-term vision to quarterly execution, and the recent addition of risk tracking at the key result level introduces a project management layer directly into the OKR workflow.

I appreciated how the alignment views made it possible to trace a single key result back up through department goals to the corporate objective. That level of structural visibility is difficult to replicate in tools that treat goals as flat lists.

Teamflect handles goals and OKRs within the Microsoft Teams environment, supporting cascading, sub-goals, custom labels, and custom timeframes. The January 2026 preset goal templates let administrators lock down title formats and measurement criteria to enforce consistency across departments.

OKR check-ins happen directly in Teams chat as adaptive cards, making progress updates a lightweight interaction rather than a dedicated session. An OKR feed gives visibility into goal activity across the organization.

The goal management layer is functional for teams that want lightweight tracking without leaving their collaboration tool, but it lacks the structural depth of Profit.co's multi-framework support and extensive KPI libraries. Once goal hierarchies grow beyond two or three levels, the Teams panel view becomes difficult to navigate.

Profit.co's built-in dashboards outperform Teamflect's Power BI dependency

Profit.co delivers reporting through its Cockpit dashboard system, organized around Plan, Execute, Engage, and Learn phases. Heatmap views display departmental progress with color-coded status indicators, while alignment dashboards render OKR cascade trees that show how objectives connect vertically.

Pie charts, bar graphs, and scorecard summaries provide at-a-glance status for leadership reviews. The platform generates instant PowerPoint exports for board presentations and integrates with Power BI for organizations that want to blend OKR data with other business metrics.

I found the heatmap view particularly useful for spotting stalled departments during quarterly reviews. The visual density of Profit.co's reporting means every metric is accessible, though finding the right view sometimes requires cycling through several dashboard tabs.

Teamflect's Reports module tracks platform adoption, user activity, and engagement across its feature modules. Metrics cover goals, tasks, recognitions, feedback, reviews, surveys, and meetings, giving administrators a clear picture of how actively teams use the tool.

The real analytical power lives in Power BI. Organizations on the Professional plan can create custom Power BI reports using Teamflect data, with dashboards that refresh every three to five hours and Excel data export available across all tiers.

Without Power BI, Teamflect's native reporting is narrow, focusing more on adoption metrics than strategic goal progress. Answering a question like "which departments are behind on Q1 objectives" requires either a Power BI setup or manual data review.

Teamflect's people management suite goes deeper than Profit.co's HR layer

Where Teamflect concentrates on the employee lifecycle, Profit.co spreads into operational territory. The performance management module supports customizable review cycles with 360-degree feedback and goal-weighted assessments, but what distinguishes Profit.co is everything beyond HR: project portfolio management with financial tracking, 1-on-1 meeting management, Balanced Scorecard support, and AI agents that automate OKR progress summaries.

The result is a platform that tries to serve both the strategy office and the people team simultaneously. I found the PPM financial dashboards more polished than the engagement surveys, which felt like an afterthought compared to dedicated survey platforms. OKR certification programs round out the offering with methodology education alongside product training.

Teamflect packs a comprehensive people management toolkit into its Microsoft Teams experience. Performance reviews support customizable cycles with self-assessments, manager evaluations, multi-rater 360-degree feedback, and a 9-box talent grid for succession visibility.

Recognition features include badges, points, leaderboards, and a redeemable rewards catalog, while surveys cover engagement, pulse, and anonymous formats with AI-powered summaries. Career paths, individual development plans, and an employee intranet (Professional plan) extend the platform into talent development territory.

Teamflect concentrates its additional features on the employee lifecycle rather than strategic operations. For organizations where talent management, succession planning, and employee engagement are the primary use cases alongside goal tracking, this focus delivers more relevant depth than Profit.co's broader but shallower HR layer.

Profit.co's 100+ connectors cover far more ground than Teamflect's Microsoft-only ecosystem

Profit.co takes a vendor-agnostic approach with over 100 native connectors designed to serve organizations where different departments rely on different tools. A development team running Jira, a sales org on Salesforce, and a finance department using Power BI can all feed live data into OKRs without middleware or manual CSV exports.

I appreciated the native Salesforce connector, which piped revenue metrics directly into key results without manual entry. The HRIS connectors (BambooHR, Workday, HiBob, Darwinbox) are also noteworthy for organizations that want to tie headcount or engagement data to strategic objectives. Zapier fills in the gaps for tools without a dedicated connector.

Teamflect's integration story is Microsoft 365 through and through. The platform syncs with Entra ID for directory management, Planner and To Do for task workflows, OneDrive and SharePoint for file access, Power BI for analytics, and Microsoft 365 Copilot for AI features.

The Professional plan adds HRIS integration with 200+ platforms including SAP SuccessFactors, ADP, BambooHR, HiBob, Workday, and UKG, plus API access for custom connections. That HRIS breadth is meaningful for HR teams managing data across multiple systems.

Outside the Microsoft ecosystem, Teamflect's connector options are thin. Organizations using Slack, Jira, or Salesforce will find no native bridges, a deliberate architectural choice that optimizes for Microsoft 365 depth rather than cross-vendor breadth.

Profit.co's 24/7 availability edges out Teamflect's onboarding-first approach

Profit.co provides 24/7 live chat alongside email and phone support (24/5), with an extensive help center covering common workflows. OKR certification programs and OKR University resources go beyond product support into methodology education.

Support responsiveness is a consistent strength of the platform, with always-available live chat and dedicated phone access ensuring organizations in any time zone can reach a human. I found the live chat response time to be under five minutes during a weekday afternoon test.

A 99.9% uptime SLA adds operational reliability. For organizations that need guaranteed support coverage, the breadth of channels is reassuring.

Teamflect bundles a dedicated customer success manager with every paid plan, regardless of tier, and includes free implementation support, end-user training, and admin training at no extra cost. An in-app help beacon provides searchable articles and direct support chat.

The onboarding-first model means organizations get hands-on guidance from day one through tutorials, training guides, and troubleshooting documentation. Professional plan customers receive enhanced team-level reporting support.

Phone support does not appear in Teamflect's support offering, which is noticeable for organizations that prefer voice-based troubleshooting. The CSM relationship proves valuable for strategic questions, but for urgent technical issues the lack of a phone channel is a gap.

Final call: Profit.co vs Teamflect

Profit.co earns the overall win in this comparison with four category victories. Its goal management infrastructure, native reporting, integration breadth, and support channels give it clear advantages for organizations that need a standalone strategy execution platform.

Teamflect is the right choice for Microsoft-first organizations that prioritize adoption speed and people management. Its pricing transparency, embedded Teams experience, and talent management depth solve problems that Profit.co's broader platform does not prioritize.

The deciding factor is your organization's tech ecosystem. Profit.co's connector library serves diverse, multi-vendor stacks, while Teamflect removes every barrier to adoption for teams whose single source of truth is Microsoft 365.

Neither platform is a wrong choice. The winner depends on whether your organization values strategic depth or workflow proximity.

Outgrowing Profit.co or Teamflect? Try Mooncamp

Profit.co asks organizations to navigate a dense, multi-module environment to manage strategy execution, while Teamflect confines its entire experience to the dimensions of a Microsoft Teams panel. Mooncamp provides a standalone workspace that combines structural depth with a clean interface, giving teams the flexibility to run any goal framework at any scale without inheriting either tool's constraints.

Where Profit.co requires weeks of training and Teamflect requires Microsoft 365 commitment, Mooncamp is designed to roll out across departments quickly. Organizations define their own goal types, workflows, and reporting views, adapting the platform to their methodology rather than the other way around.

• Fast rollout with minimal training overhead: A modern, intuitive interface that teams across every department navigate from their first session, removing the ramp-up time Profit.co demands and the ecosystem lock-in Teamflect requires.
• Goal architecture that conforms to your methodology: Build custom goal types, statuses, progress calculations, and cadences to run OKRs, SMART goals, balanced scorecards, or any hybrid your organization needs, instead of choosing between rigid frameworks.
• Live dashboards assembled for any audience: Create fully customizable charts and dashboards that deliver board-level summaries or team-level operational views from the same data, with no external BI tool required.
• Cross-ecosystem connectivity: Works natively inside Microsoft Teams (with the deepest Teams integration available) and Slack, while data integrations with Jira, Power BI, and MS Planner keep goal progress synced across the entire tool stack.