Perdoo vs Tability: Which is better in 2026?

Choosing between OKR platforms used to mean picking "simple" or "enterprise," but a new generation of tools has blurred that line.

Perdoo and Tability both occupy the accessible end of the market, yet they solve fundamentally different problems: one builds a structured bridge from boardroom strategy to team execution, while the other makes weekly goal tracking so frictionless that teams actually do it.

That philosophical gap has practical consequences for how your organization runs OKR cycles, reports on progress, and scales the practice across departments.

The wrong choice can mean months of adoption friction that no amount of training will fix.

I tested both platforms to see where each one excels and where each one falls short, and this article walks through seven comparison categories, plus a bonus pick that fills the gaps both tools leave open.

What's new in Perdoo?

Perdoo kicked off 2026 with Vince AI Coach, an embedded assistant that reviews draft objectives, suggests strategic pillars, and answers methodology questions. It escalates to human coaches when it reaches its limits.

In February 2026, a Monday.com integration landed alongside a major upgrade to OKR cloning that preserves integration connections and historical progress across quarters. The platform also shipped sub-goals with automatic rollup, custom fields, weighted Key Results, and connectors for Snowflake, Tableau, and Azure DevOps.

What's new in Tability?

Tability launched a Microsoft Teams app in February 2026, available directly from the Teams Marketplace without sideloading. For organizations already running OKRs inside Microsoft 365, this removes a significant adoption barrier.

In January 2026, a new Jira integration built on Atlassian Forge replaced the previous connector with a more reliable architecture. The same release improved SCIM integration with Microsoft Entra ID and added committed vs. aspirational labels for Key Results.

Perdoo vs Tability — in a nutshell

Perdoo is a top-down strategy execution system where OKRs, KPIs, and performance management all ladder up to a visual strategy map. Tability treats goal tracking as a lightweight weekly habit, leaning on AI and automated reminders to keep teams accountable.

Perdoo rewards upfront investment in strategic architecture with powerful alignment and reporting. Tability earns its value through consistent, low-friction check-in cycles.

Here's what I'll be comparing across both tools (with Mooncamp added as a reference point):

Perdoo's free tier gives it the edge, but Tability skips seat minimums

Perdoo prices across three tiers. The Free plan supports up to 5 users with core OKR/KPI tracking, strategy maps, check-ins, 1:1s, and basic integrations. Paid plans require a minimum of 10 licenses, which means the floor cost for any paid Perdoo deployment is $80 per month.

Premium ($8 per user per month) unlocks performance dashboards, engagement dashboards, SSO/SCIM, and API access. Supreme ($10 per user per month) adds KPI boards, private goals, custom fields, custom reports, the full integration suite, and view-only licenses at $1.50 per user per month.

The minimum 10-license requirement is the friction point I noticed most. A 6-person team that outgrows the free plan must pay for 10 seats regardless, making the effective per-user cost significantly higher for small teams.

Perdoo subscription plans

*10% discount when billed annually instead of quarterly.

Tability prices in USD with no minimum seat requirements. Basic starts at $6 per user per month (billed yearly) and includes AI goal setting, check-ins, strategy maps, cascading, initiatives, kanban boards, reports, and Slack integration.

Premium ($10 per user per month) adds free read-only seats, AI retrospectives, custom dashboards, automated check-ins, standups, and team management features. Enterprise is available for organizations with 100+ users and includes regional hosting, tailored onboarding, and a dedicated customer success manager.

Tability no longer offers a free plan. Teams that need to test the platform can use a 14-day trial.

Tability subscription plans

Perdoo's free tier is the clear differentiator for budget-conscious teams. Up to 5 users get full access to OKRs, KPIs, and strategy maps at no cost. Tability's $6 entry point is competitive but requires a paid commitment from day one. At larger team sizes, the pricing gap narrows and feature depth becomes the deciding factor.

Perdoo's strategic depth vs. Tability's check-in-first simplicity

Perdoo's interface is organized around a strategy-first mental model. The left sidebar surfaces Strategy, Goals, and Performance as top-level sections, and the platform encourages users to start from the strategy map before drilling into specific OKRs and KPIs.

The Explore view combines cascading hierarchies and strategy visualization on a single canvas. Navigation between these layers is smooth, though switching between an individual goal's detail view and the broader map can feel like context-switching mid-thought.

Tability's UI is built around doing, not planning. The Focus page opens to your outstanding check-ins and recent activity, which sets the tone for a tool designed to be visited weekly rather than configured quarterly.

Goal views use clean progress indicators and the outcomes map provides a visual alignment layer. I appreciated how quickly the interface communicates what needs attention right now.

The trade-off is that Tability's layout has changed several times between releases, which can disrupt the muscle memory that develops over repeated use.

Perdoo's goal architecture runs deeper, but Tability's AI lowers the barrier to entry

Perdoo separates OKRs and KPIs into distinct goal types, both of which anchor to the Strategy Map through strategic pillars. Sub-goals roll up automatically, weighted Key Results let teams calibrate how much each metric contributes to Objective progress, and custom fields allow attaching metadata like risk scores or budget codes.

The platform also supports multiple strategic frameworks beyond OKRs, including Balanced Scorecard and OGSM, with configurable terminology. For organizations running complex goal management across divisions, this structural depth is a clear advantage.

Tability takes the opposite approach: make goal creation so easy that teams start tracking outcomes within hours. The Tabby AI chatbot drafts objectives from a plain-language prompt, auto-detects measurable key results, and coaches on goal quality before anything is committed.

The cascading outcomes map shows how goals connect across teams, and the weekly check-in workflow is the central mechanism for keeping progress current. Where Perdoo rewards upfront architectural investment, Tability rewards consistent participation.

I found Tability's AI suggestions genuinely useful for a first draft, though teams with mature OKR practices will want more granularity than Tability provides. There are no weighted KRs, no custom fields, and no sub-goal hierarchies beyond the basic outcomes map.

Perdoo's reporting is built for the boardroom; Tability's is built for the standup

Perdoo treats reporting as a core capability, not an afterthought. The Supreme plan unlocks custom dashboards, KPI boards with month-over-month sparklines, and a Health Report that tracks OKR program adoption metrics like participation rates and update frequency.

Export options include CSV, PDF, and PowerPoint. The PowerPoint output is formatted well enough to drop into a QBR deck without reworking slides.

Tability offers 10+ prebuilt dashboards and a one-click report generator that compiles goal progress into a shareable summary. The AI layer adds data-driven commentary by analyzing check-in trends and flagging goals at risk.

Custom dashboards are available on the Premium plan but remain in beta, and export options are more limited than Perdoo's. I found Tability's reports practical for weekly team syncs but lacking the analytical depth a leadership team would expect for quarterly reviews.

Perdoo doubles as a lightweight performance suite; Tability stays focused on goals

Perdoo extends well beyond OKR tracking with built-in 1:1 meeting tools (collaborative agendas, action items linked to goals), performance reviews (customizable question sets, rating scales), pulse surveys, and a kudos feature for public recognition. The Vince AI Coach rounds out the package with real-time methodology guidance.

For organizations looking to reduce tool sprawl, this breadth means fewer separate subscriptions for coaching conversations, feedback cycles, and engagement measurement. I found the 1:1 meeting tool particularly well-integrated, pulling relevant goal context directly into the conversation agenda.

Tability keeps its scope deliberately narrow. Async standups collect daily or weekly updates from team members without scheduling a meeting. The Tabby AI coaching layer analyzes check-in data and recommends course corrections. Automated reminders maintain cadence without manager intervention.

These features serve one purpose: keeping goal tracking alive between planning cycles. Teams that also need structured 1:1s, performance evaluations, or employee sentiment data will need separate tools alongside Tability.

Tability connects to more developer-friendly data sources; Perdoo covers the enterprise stack

Perdoo's integration library includes 15+ native connectors spanning project management (Jira, Asana, Monday.com, Azure DevOps), data and BI (Power BI, Snowflake, Tableau, Google Analytics), CRM (Salesforce), messaging (Slack, MS Teams), and HRIS (BambooHR, Factorial). A GraphQL API enables custom integrations, and Zapier extends connectivity further.

Many of these integrations feed data directly into goal progress calculations. I connected the Jira integration and watched Key Results update automatically as linked issues moved through their workflow.

Tability offers 24+ native integrations with a distinctly different profile. Alongside the expected PM tools (Jira, Asana, ClickUp, Linear, Shortcut) and messaging apps (Slack, MS Teams), Tability connects to developer-friendly data sources like PostgreSQL, MySQL, BigQuery, Amplitude, and ChartMogul.

A dedicated Jira Marketplace app embeds OKR tracking directly inside Jira. The breadth of data connectors is impressive for a tool at this price point, though enterprise connectors like Salesforce and Snowflake are absent.

Perdoo's live chat speed and dedicated CSMs set a higher support bar

Perdoo provides in-app live chat with a claimed median response time under 10 minutes. Accounts with 25+ licenses receive a dedicated Customer Success Manager who conducts structured onboarding with check-ins at two weeks, one month, and three months.

Multi-lingual support is available on Premium and above. The Vince AI Coach serves as a 24/7 self-help layer for OKR methodology questions, and expert coaching is available as a paid add-on.

Tability offers email and in-app chat with a target response time within 1 business day. Support operates during business hours across US (CST) and Australian (NSW) time zones.

A knowledge base at guides.tability.io covers setup and feature walkthroughs, and the team runs webinars for onboarding. The Tabby AI provides in-product coaching on goal quality. I noticed the response time difference most during initial setup, where questions tend to cluster.

Final call: Perdoo vs Tability

Perdoo is the more complete platform in 2026. It wins on goal management depth, reporting, additional features, and support responsiveness.

Tability earns genuine wins on integration breadth and no seat minimums, particularly for smaller teams and organizations with developer-heavy tech stacks.

The choice comes down to organizational maturity. Teams adopting OKRs for the first time will find Tability's AI-assisted setup and low-friction check-ins get them running faster. Teams with established goal-setting practices will find Perdoo's structural depth and reporting capabilities hard to outgrow.

Perdoo's active development cadence strengthens the recommendation. Monthly feature releases throughout 2025 and into 2026 suggest the platform is investing in closing its remaining gaps.

Outgrowing Perdoo or Tability? Try Mooncamp

Both Perdoo and Tability constrain organizations in different ways: Perdoo through rigid reporting templates and fixed goal frameworks, Tability through shallow goal hierarchies and limited analytical depth. Mooncamp is built for teams that need the structural depth of Perdoo and the ease of use of Tability without accepting either tool's trade-offs.

• Designed for organization-wide adoption: An award-winning interface that every role can use from day one, no lengthy onboarding or power-user training required.
• Flexible goal architecture: Define custom goal types, progress calculation methods, and workflows that reflect how your organization actually runs strategy, not how a tool thinks you should.
• Advanced reporting engine: Build fully customizable dashboards and charts for any stakeholder, from team-level progress views to board-ready QBR presentations.
• Deep data integrations: Native connectors for Jira, Power BI, MS Planner, and Slack, plus the most advanced MS Teams integration on the market.