Perdoo vs Profit.co: Which is better in 2026?

Choosing an OKR platform often comes down to a philosophical question: do you want depth and breadth, or clarity and speed?

Perdoo and Profit.co sit on opposite ends of that spectrum. One strips goal management down to a focused strategy execution workflow, while the other bundles OKRs with task management, balanced scorecards, project portfolios, and gamified engagement into a single ecosystem.

Both tools have matured significantly through 2025 and 2026, shipping AI assistants, new integrations, and refined reporting features at a steady pace.

The stakes of getting this choice wrong are real. Picking a tool that overwhelms your teams leads to low adoption, while choosing one that is too simple creates a ceiling you hit within months.

I tested both platforms across seven categories to see where each excels, plus a bonus alternative for teams that find neither tool quite right.

What's new in Perdoo?

Perdoo launched Vince AI Coach in January 2026, an embedded assistant that draws on internal methodology resources to review draft objectives, answer OKR questions, and recommend strategic pillars. It escalates to the human support team when queries fall outside its training data.

The Monday.com integration and enhanced OKR cloning followed in February 2026. Teams can now copy OKRs into new quarters with integrations and historical progress intact, and batch-clone aligned goals across departments in a single action.

What's new in Profit.co?

Profit.co rolled out department-level visibility settings in January 2026, letting administrators auto-apply access controls to all new OKRs created within a department. The same release introduced Key Result-level risk tracking, enabling teams to flag and monitor risks directly on individual KRs.

A dual-license tier model also launched in January, splitting users into Full Access and Read-Only categories for more cost-effective organization-wide visibility. Bulk performance goal import via CSV shipped alongside it, reducing setup time for large rollouts.

Perdoo vs Profit.co — in a nutshell

Perdoo is a strategy-first platform that routes everything through a visual strategy map, connecting company direction to team-level OKRs and KPIs in a structured top-down flow. Profit.co is a feature-dense execution platform that wraps OKRs in task management, project portfolio tools, performance reviews, and employee engagement modules.

In practice, the difference shows up on day one. Perdoo teams are productive within hours because there is less to configure, while Profit.co teams need a structured rollout plan but unlock significantly more functionality once they clear the initial learning curve.

The table below breaks down each category at a glance, with Mooncamp included as a third point of reference for teams evaluating alternatives.

Profit.co starts cheaper, but Perdoo's free tier packs more depth

Both platforms offer a free plan supporting up to 5 users, making initial evaluation low-risk. The meaningful differences emerge on paid tiers and in what each tool gates behind higher plans.

Perdoo prices in EUR and requires a minimum of 10 licenses on paid plans, creating a floor cost of roughly $87 per month even if you only need 6 seats. The free tier, however, is genuinely functional: it includes strategy maps, check-ins, 1:1s, performance reviews, pulse surveys, and kudos.

I found Perdoo's free plan surprisingly complete for a small leadership team piloting OKRs. The paid upgrade becomes necessary when you need dashboards, SSO, or advanced integrations.

Perdoo subscription plans

Prices converted from EUR to approximate USD. Annual billing saves 10% vs. quarterly.

Profit.co prices in USD with no documented minimum license requirement. The Growth plan at $7.00 per user per month is the most affordable paid OKR tier in this comparison. Its modular structure lets organizations add performance management, task management, or PPM modules individually.

Enterprise pricing requires a sales conversation, which makes total cost harder to estimate at scale.

Profit.co subscription plans

Growth pricing shown for annual billing. Monthly billing is $9.00 per user per month.

Profit.co offers a lower entry point and more flexibility for teams of any size. Perdoo delivers more built-in functionality on its free tier but charges a premium once you scale past the 5-user limit.

Perdoo's focused design wins over Profit.co's feature density

Perdoo's interface is organized around its Strategy Map and Explore views, giving users a spatial sense of how goals connect from the top of the organization downward. The recent navigation redesign consolidated cascades, maps, and boards into a single browsable workspace.

The result is an interface that feels calm and purposeful, with color-coded progress indicators and clean typography that make scanning dozens of objectives quick and intuitive. I could orient new colleagues to Perdoo's layout in a single 15-minute walkthrough.

The trade-off is rigidity. Teams wanting to rearrange layouts, create custom filtered views, or personalize their home screen will find the options limited.

Profit.co takes the opposite approach, putting eight different OKR views at the user's fingertips: List, Gantt, Progress, Alignment, Heatmap, Hierarchy, Scorecard, and Table. The Cockpit dashboard offers a C-level snapshot with pie charts by status and bar graphs by department.

This flexibility is genuine. Different roles can interact with the same goal data in whatever format suits their decision-making style.

The cost is cognitive load. First-time users face an array of menus, modules, and configuration options that can make simple tasks feel buried. Profit.co addresses this with onboarding wizards, but the initial ramp-up is noticeably steeper than Perdoo's.

Profit.co's AI and breadth give it the edge in goal management

Perdoo organizes goals and OKRs through a visual hierarchy: an Ultimate Goal at the top, Strategic Pillars beneath it, then company, team, and individual OKRs cascading downward. KPIs are tracked in parallel through dedicated KPI Boards, and sub-goals roll progress upward automatically.

The enhanced OKR cloning shipped in February 2026 makes quarterly transitions smoother, letting teams carry integrations and progress history into new cycles. Custom fields on the Supreme plan add metadata flexibility.

Where Perdoo excels is in making alignment tangible. My experience was that even non-technical stakeholders understood the strategy map within minutes of seeing it for the first time.

Profit.co brings an expansive toolkit to goal management, with an AI assistant that generates objectives and key results from business context to reduce blank-page syndrome. Seven different key result measurement types, automatic alignment scoring, and a library of 300+ pre-built KPIs accelerate setup.

Balanced Scorecard support runs alongside OKRs natively, letting organizations operate both frameworks in the same workspace. Confidence tracking on each KR gives managers early warning when progress stalls.

The depth of configuration is impressive but demands planning. Teams that roll out Profit.co without a structured onboarding sequence risk underutilizing features that could otherwise drive real value.

Both platforms report well, but from very different angles

Perdoo's reporting shines for leadership communication. The Supreme plan unlocks custom dashboards, KPI Boards with month-over-month sparklines, and a Health Report that tracks adoption metrics like participation rates and check-in completion. Exports to CSV, PDF, and PowerPoint let teams drop live data into quarterly reviews without rebuilding slides.

Pre-built performance dashboards and engagement dashboards on Premium give mid-tier users solid visibility, though the real power sits behind the Supreme paywall.

I found the PowerPoint export especially practical for executive readouts where the audience wants polished visuals, not a live product demo.

Profit.co approaches reporting from an operational monitoring perspective. Heatmaps instantly surface which departments or objectives are lagging. Radar charts visualize goal health across multiple dimensions, and confidence scores aggregate into real-time dashboards.

The AI-generated summaries are a standout feature. They analyze check-in data and produce concise narrative reports that save managers from reading through dozens of individual updates manually.

The Cockpit dashboard is effective for C-level snapshots, though its information density can feel overwhelming when every widget is populated. Teams benefit from curating which widgets stay visible.

Profit.co's breadth of additional features is hard to match

Perdoo extends its core with 1:1 meeting tools featuring collaborative agendas and action items, performance reviews with customizable question sets and star ratings, pulse surveys measuring engagement on a simple scale, and public kudos for peer recognition. The Vince AI Coach adds self-serve OKR guidance around the clock.

These features make Perdoo a lightweight people management layer on top of its strategy execution core. For teams under 200 people that want to consolidate tools, the bundled approach removes the need for a separate engagement platform.

The depth, however, is limited. Organizations with mature performance management processes will find the review and survey modules basic compared to dedicated HR tools.

Profit.co's additional feature set is substantially broader. Built-in task management connects daily work directly to key results, 360-degree performance reviews compile AI-summarized feedback from peers and managers, and project portfolio management tracks program-level financials and tollgates.

Employee engagement tools include awards, badges, and leaderboards that turn OKR participation into a visible, celebrated activity. Meeting management and structured check-in workflows round out the operational toolkit.

The modular pricing model means organizations only pay for the modules they activate. My observation was that this flexibility makes Profit.co viable for teams that want specific capabilities without buying the full suite.

Profit.co's 100+ connectors dwarf Perdoo's integration catalog

Perdoo offers roughly 20 native integrations spanning project management (Jira, Asana, Monday.com), data and BI (Power BI, Snowflake, Tableau, Google Sheets), CRM (Salesforce), messaging (Slack, Microsoft Teams), and HRIS (BambooHR, Factorial). A GraphQL API and Zapier connectivity extend the reach further.

The recent Monday.com addition closed a notable gap for teams using that project management platform. SSO and SCIM support are available on paid plans.

Key integrations like Jira and Power BI are gated behind the Supreme plan, which means teams on Premium may need to rely on Zapier for connectors that Profit.co includes natively at lower tiers.

Profit.co lists over 100 native integrations across HRIS systems (Workday, SAP SuccessFactors, BambooHR, HiBob, Darwinbox), data and BI tools (Snowflake, BigQuery, Tableau, Looker, Domo), project management (Jira, Asana, Monday.com, ClickUp, Wrike, Smartsheet), CRM (Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive, Zoho CRM), and AI providers (OpenAI, Gemini, Azure AI, Claude).

I was impressed by the breadth of HRIS connectors in particular, which is rare among OKR-focused platforms. Custom connectors are available for organizations with proprietary systems.

The sheer volume means most teams will find their existing tech stack supported without workarounds. For data-driven organizations that rely on automated KPI ingestion from multiple sources, Profit.co's integration catalog is a decisive advantage.

Both support teams excel, with different strengths

Perdoo's in-app live chat operates with a documented median response time under 20 minutes and a 97.2% customer satisfaction score. Support is available on all plans including the free tier, and accounts with 25+ licenses on Supreme receive a dedicated Customer Success Manager.

The Vince AI Coach adds a 24/7 self-serve layer for methodology questions, draft OKR reviews, and strategic pillar recommendations. Paid coaching add-ons are available for teams that want hands-on implementation guidance.

Multi-lingual chat support on Premium and Supreme plans is a practical advantage for European organizations operating across language boundaries.

Profit.co provides 24/7 live chat and email support staffed by real agents, with phone support available when needed. OKR certification programs offer structured learning paths, with the Practitioner tier at $299 providing in-depth training from accredited OKR trainers.

Implementation guidance and onboarding support come included with Growth plans, removing the friction of a separate procurement step for training. I appreciated how the certification structure gives organizations a clear path from OKR awareness to in-house expertise.

Profit.co has earned recognition for a full customer support score from Gartner, and its help center includes extensive video tutorials alongside written documentation.

Final call: Perdoo vs Profit.co

Profit.co is the stronger platform overall in this comparison. It wins on pricing, goal management, additional features, and integrations, delivering more functionality per dollar for teams willing to invest in onboarding.

Perdoo's wins are meaningful, though. Its user interface is cleaner and faster to adopt, making it the better choice for organizations that prioritize speed of rollout over feature breadth.

The reporting draw reflects genuinely different strengths. Perdoo is the pick for teams presenting to boards and investors. Profit.co is the pick for teams running weekly operational reviews.

Both platforms are actively developed, which makes this a real choice rather than a default. Perdoo's AI coaching and Profit.co's dual-license model show that each team is listening to customer needs and shipping accordingly.

Outgrowing Perdoo or Profit.co? Try Mooncamp

Both Perdoo and Profit.co push organizations toward their respective opinionated workflows: Perdoo through a rigid strategy map structure, Profit.co through a dense all-in-one ecosystem. Mooncamp takes a different path, giving teams a clean workspace where they define their own goal types, terminology, and cadences without inheriting someone else's framework assumptions.

The reporting engine is built for flexibility from the ground up. Instead of choosing between polished-but-templated exports and dense-but-overwhelming operational dashboards, teams build exactly the views each stakeholder needs, updated in real time from live goal data.

• Built for fast, organization-wide adoption: An award-winning interface that removes the onboarding friction of Profit.co's dense menus and the layout rigidity of Perdoo's fixed views, getting teams across every department productive from day one.
• Goal architecture that adapts to your process: Define custom goal types, statuses, cadences, and fields to support OKRs, Balanced Scorecards, SMART goals, or any hybrid framework your organization actually runs.
• Reporting built for every audience: Fully customizable dashboards and charts that serve both board-level strategic reviews and weekly team standups, without the template constraints of Perdoo or the information overload of Profit.co.
• Enterprise-grade connectivity: Native integrations with Jira, Power BI, MS Planner, and Slack, plus the most advanced Microsoft Teams integration on the market, backed by hundreds of successful rollouts worldwide.