Perdoo vs Quantive: Which is better in 2026?

Quantive was once one of the top enterprise OKR platforms on the market. Then WorkBoard acquired it in May 2025, and everything changed.

The standalone Quantive product is being phased out. Existing customers are migrating to WorkBoard's platform, often mid-cycle, facing new workflows, a different UX, and in many cases higher costs.

If you are searching for "Perdoo vs Quantive" today, you should know that Quantive as an independent product is effectively gone. This comparison is still worth reading because it puts both platforms in context, but the acquisition casts a long shadow over every category.

Perdoo, by contrast, has been shipping monthly releases throughout 2025 and 2026, expanding its integrations, launching an AI coaching assistant, and deepening its strategy visualization.

I tested both platforms across seven categories to see how they compare on paper, plus a bonus pick for teams looking beyond both tools.

What's new in Perdoo?

Vince AI Coach launched in January 2026, giving teams an embedded AI assistant that answers methodology questions, reviews draft OKRs, and suggests improvements directly inside the product. It draws on both public OKR resources and Perdoo's own knowledge base.

Monday.com integration and enhanced OKR cloning arrived in February 2026. The improved cloning workflow lets teams carry over integrations, retain historical progress, and selectively copy aligned OKRs into new cycles.

What's new in Quantive?

There is no new Quantive roadmap to discuss. WorkBoard acquired Quantive in May 2025 and is shutting down the standalone product.

Customers are being migrated to WorkBoard's platform, which brings a different UX, different admin workflows, and potential data residency changes for EU-hosted accounts. The last meaningful Quantive releases before the acquisition were a unified Reporting Hub and a redesigned KPI module in May 2025.

Perdoo vs Quantive — in a nutshell

Perdoo is a focused strategy execution platform that connects OKRs and KPIs to visual strategy maps, designed for teams that want clarity and fast adoption. Quantive was an enterprise-grade analytics platform with 170+ integrations and AI-powered insights, but its acquisition by WorkBoard in May 2025 means the standalone product is being retired.

This comparison evaluates both tools on their own merits across seven categories. Keep in mind that Quantive's features, pricing, and support are all in transition as customers migrate to WorkBoard.

Here is how they compare across the key dimensions (Mooncamp included as a third reference point):

Perdoo publishes every price; Quantive hides its best features behind sales calls

Pricing transparency is one of the starkest differences between these two platforms. Perdoo lists every plan, every feature, and every price on its website, while Quantive publishes only its Scale tier and requires sales conversations for anything above it.

Perdoo subscription plans

Perdoo prices in EUR but I have converted to approximate USD equivalents for consistency. Volume discounts are available at scale, and annual billing saves 10%.

The free tier includes genuine functionality, not just a feature preview.

Quantive subscription plans

Quantive's pricing story changed significantly in October 2023 when several features previously included in Scale (Insightboards, exports, approval workflows, bulk operations) were moved to the Enterprise tier. The $9.00 per user per month price now buys less than it used to.

Enterprise pricing is not public, though one reviewer cited a minimum annual commitment of roughly $6,000.

Perdoo keeps it simple; Quantive gives power users more controls

Perdoo's interface is deliberately minimal. The navigation centers on a unified Explore view that merges cascades, strategy maps, and boards into a single browsable space.

The design prioritizes readability with color-coded progress indicators, clean typography, and generous whitespace. I found myself navigating Perdoo's interface almost immediately after signing up.

Where Perdoo falls short is depth. Teams that need granular layout customization, advanced filtering, or configurable views will bump into the boundaries of its streamlined design.

Quantive's interface reflects its enterprise heritage with alignment views, confidence indicators, whiteboard canvases, and multi-framework navigation all accessible from the main workspace. The density of options gives experienced users significant control over how they visualize progress.

That density has a cost. First-time users face a steeper onboarding ramp, and configuring the workspace to match a specific team's workflow requires deliberate setup time.

The post-acquisition transition adds another layer of uncertainty. Teams adopting Quantive now may need to learn a different interface entirely as the product merges into WorkBoard.

Quantive's data engine and AI give it an edge for complex goal architectures

Perdoo structures goals and OKRs through a clear hierarchy: strategic pillars at the top, company OKRs beneath them, then team and individual objectives. Sub-goals roll up automatically, Key Results can be weighted, and the Initiatives layer connects daily projects to strategic outcomes.

Custom fields (available on Supreme) let teams add metadata to goals, and the Vince AI Coach helps draft and refine OKRs inside the product. My experience was that Perdoo rewards teams who follow a structured OKR process closely, because the platform mirrors that structure faithfully.

The limitation surfaces when organizations need to deviate. Teams running Balanced Scorecards, hybrid frameworks, or custom goal taxonomies will find Perdoo's OKR-centric model harder to bend to their needs.

Quantive approaches goal management as a data problem. Its AI-guided creation engine suggests objectives based on organizational context, and goals can be tracked as OKRs, KPIs, Balanced Scorecards, or custom frameworks with adjustable terminology.

The real differentiator is automated progress tracking. With 170+ native connectors, Key Results can pull live data from CRM systems, BI tools, data warehouses, and project management platforms without manual input.

This breadth trades off against setup complexity. Configuring automated data flows and mapping goal structures across a large organization is not a quick process, and the WorkBoard acquisition raises questions about whether the current goal architecture will persist unchanged.

Quantive's analytics run deeper, but Perdoo's reports are easier to build

Perdoo's reporting suite includes performance dashboards, engagement dashboards, KPI boards with sparkline visualizations, and custom reports with adjustable filters and columns. The Supreme plan unlocks fully custom dashboards, and exports are available in CSV, PDF, and PowerPoint formats.

For most teams, this coverage is sufficient. I appreciated how quickly I could assemble a quarterly review deck by exporting dashboard views directly to PowerPoint.

The gap appears when leadership needs predictive analytics, cross-source data aggregation, or BI-level drill-downs. Perdoo's reporting is designed for clarity, not for deep exploratory analysis.

Quantive built its reputation on analytics. Insightboards combine data from 170+ integrations into real-time dashboards with predictive projections and AI-powered trend detection.

For enterprises with complex reporting needs, this is powerful. Cross-functional visibility, automated KPI projections, and the ability to blend data from dozens of sources into a single view set Quantive apart from lighter tools.

The catch is access. Insightboards and export functionality are Enterprise-only features, meaning organizations on the Scale plan see a significantly reduced version of Quantive's reporting capabilities.

Perdoo bundles people management; Quantive stays focused on strategic planning

Perdoo extends well beyond goal tracking with built-in 1:1 meeting tools, performance reviews that pull in OKR progress and KPI health automatically, pulse surveys on a 1-to-5 engagement scale, and public kudos recognition. This breadth makes it a lightweight alternative to separate performance management tools for smaller organizations.

My sense is that teams under 200 people get the most value from this bundled approach. It reduces the number of tools employees need to log into.

The trade-off is that none of these features are as deep as dedicated HR platforms. Organizations with mature performance management processes may find the review and survey modules too basic.

Quantive stays in the strategic planning lane with built-in frameworks for SWOT, PEST, and Porter's Five Forces. Collaborative whiteboards support brainstorming sessions, and the scenario planning tools let teams model different strategic paths.

The StrategyAI platform, announced before the acquisition, introduced AI agents for automated strategy analysis. Mobile apps on iOS and Android give field teams access to goals on the go.

Quantive intentionally separates OKR tracking from performance reviews. Organizations that want unified people management and goal management will need a separate tool alongside Quantive.

Quantive's 170+ connectors outpace Perdoo's focused but growing library

Perdoo's integration catalog has expanded meaningfully over the past year with native connectors for Jira, Asana, Monday.com, Salesforce, Power BI, Snowflake, Tableau, Google Sheets, Excel Online, Google Analytics, BambooHR, Factorial, Trello, Azure DevOps, Slack, and Microsoft Teams. Zapier opens the door to 5,000+ additional apps, and a GraphQL API supports custom integrations.

For most mid-market organizations, this library covers the essentials. I found the Jira integration particularly smooth for engineering teams tracking sprint-level Key Results.

Perdoo's limitation is breadth. Organizations with diverse or specialized tech stacks may hit gaps that require Zapier workarounds or API development.

Quantive's integration library is in a different league with over 170 native connectors spanning CRM, BI, data warehouses, project management, marketing, HR, and identity providers. This breadth means Quantive can ingest live data from virtually any business system.

Teams that rely on automated, multi-source KPI tracking find significant value here. A custom connector framework and REST API extend the platform further.

The question is whether this integration library survives the WorkBoard transition intact. There is no public commitment on connector continuity, and the merged platform may consolidate or deprecate connectors.

Perdoo's learning ecosystem and accessible support give it the edge

Perdoo offers in-app live chat on all plans, including the free tier, with fast response times and a support team that goes beyond troubleshooting to help optimize OKR processes. Multi-lingual support is available on paid plans, and Supreme accounts with 50+ users get a dedicated Customer Success Manager.

Beyond reactive support, Perdoo has built one of the strongest educational ecosystems in the OKR space. I found the OKR course, blog content, YouTube channel, and the new Vince AI Coach especially valuable during initial setup.

OKR coaching is available as a paid add-on, which may be a drawback for teams that need hands-on implementation guidance included in their subscription.

Quantive provides live chat for quick questions, a ticketing system for technical issues, and email support for Enterprise customers. Enterprise accounts receive dedicated support teams and personalized onboarding.

Below the Enterprise tier, the experience is less consistent with slower response times and less personalized assistance. The Help Center documentation covers core functionality but does not match Perdoo's breadth of educational content.

The WorkBoard acquisition adds uncertainty to the support landscape. Support structures, documentation, and CSM assignments may change as the platforms merge.

Final call: Perdoo vs Quantive

Perdoo is the clear winner in this comparison. It wins on pricing, user interface, additional features, and support. More importantly, it is a product that is actively being developed and improved.

Quantive was a strong enterprise platform, but it no longer exists as an independent product. The WorkBoard acquisition means customers are being forced onto a different platform with a different UX, higher price tags, and widespread dissatisfaction among migrating users.

If you are a current Quantive customer, this is not a "wait and see" situation. The product you signed up for is being retired. Evaluate your alternatives now rather than being pushed into a WorkBoard contract on someone else's timeline.

For everyone else, Perdoo is the safer, more actively developed choice. It delivers a complete strategy execution toolkit that teams can adopt this quarter and rely on for years.

Outgrowing Perdoo or Quantive? Try Mooncamp

Perdoo's focused approach works well until organizations need more structural flexibility, and Quantive's analytical power comes bundled with acquisition uncertainty and steep configuration requirements. Mooncamp is built for teams that want both depth and usability without accepting either compromise.

Custom goal types, configurable statuses, flexible fields, and adjustable workflows mean you are not locked into a single methodology. Combined with an advanced reporting engine and hands-on expert support, it scales from departmental pilots to company-wide rollouts.

• Adoption-first design: An award-winning interface that teams across the entire organization use from day one, removing the onboarding friction that limits Perdoo and the complexity barrier that slows Quantive adoption.
• Strategy framework that fits your process: Define custom goal types, statuses, cadences, and terminology to match any methodology, whether your teams run OKRs, Balanced Scorecards, or something entirely their own.
• Executive-ready reporting: Build fully customizable dashboards and charts for any audience, from weekly team syncs to quarterly board presentations, without rigid templates or manual data compilation.
• Stable, deep integrations: Native connectors for Jira, Power BI, MS Planner, and Slack, plus the most advanced Microsoft Teams integration on the market, all backed by a team with hundreds of successful enterprise rollouts.