10 best Viva Goals alternatives in 2026

Microsoft Viva Goals, formerly known as Ally.io, was an OKR and goal management tool integrated into the Microsoft Viva employee experience suite. It helped organizations set, track, and align objectives across teams within the Microsoft 365 ecosystem.

With Viva Goals officially discontinued as of December 2025, organizations that relied on the platform need to find a replacement quickly. Even before the shutdown, the tool had notable limitations: its rigid OKR-only framework left little room for teams with different goal-setting approaches, the data visualization capabilities were basic, and integrations outside the Microsoft ecosystem were sparse. The learning curve was steep for employees unfamiliar with OKRs or Microsoft's broader tooling.

Here are 10 alternatives that cover a range of approaches to goal management and strategy execution — from dedicated OKR platforms to broader strategic planning tools — each with features, pricing, and user ratings to help you decide.

Best Viva Goals alternatives at a glance

Why look for Viva Goals alternatives?

Viva Goals served as a convenient option for Microsoft-centric organizations, but its shutdown and long-standing limitations give teams clear reasons to explore better-suited alternatives.

• Viva Goals has been discontinued: Microsoft retired Viva Goals on December 31, 2025. The platform is no longer available and all feature development stopped prior to shutdown, making migration to a new tool unavoidable.
• Limited flexibility and customization: Viva Goals enforced a rigid OKR structure that left little room for adaptation. Teams whose processes didn't fit the platform's fixed model found it too restrictive to match their actual workflows.
• Basic data visualization: The reporting and dashboard capabilities in Viva Goals were rudimentary. Generating executive-ready reports or building custom views for Quarterly Business Reviews required significant manual effort outside the platform.
• Steep learning curve for new users: Navigating Viva Goals was not intuitive, particularly for employees unfamiliar with the OKR methodology or Microsoft's broader suite. Adoption often stalled because the tool demanded too much upfront training.
• Limited integrations outside Microsoft ecosystem: While Viva Goals connected well with Microsoft 365 apps, organizations using tools like Salesforce, Jira, Slack, or other non-Microsoft platforms faced integration gaps that created data silos and duplicate manual work.
• Rigid OKR-only framework: The platform was built exclusively around OKRs with no support for hybrid goal frameworks. Tracking KPIs, balanced scorecards, or project milestones alongside OKRs required separate tools entirely.

10 best Viva Goals alternatives

1. Mooncamp

For organizations migrating from Viva Goals, Mooncamp is the most natural transition. Like Viva Goals, Mooncamp offers a powerful Microsoft Teams integration that lets teams manage OKRs, update goals, switch between cycles, and build custom views directly inside Teams — but without the rigidity and limited customization that defined Viva Goals. Mooncamp also provides a free migration service for Viva Goals customers, making the switch straightforward.

What makes Mooncamp a fundamentally better choice than Viva Goals is its adaptability. Where Viva Goals locked teams into a single rigid framework, Mooncamp molds to how your organization actually works — adapting to your terminology, processes, and workflows rather than forcing a fixed structure. Combined with hands-on expert support from a team that has guided hundreds of OKR rollouts worldwide, Mooncamp helps organizations not just manage goals, but build a sustainable strategy execution practice.

Key features

• Microsoft Teams integration: Mooncamp's native-like MS Teams integration allows teams to manage goals, update progress, view dashboards, and run check-ins directly within Microsoft Teams — offering everything Viva Goals did, with far more flexibility. Integrations with Power BI, Planner, and Outlook complete the Microsoft ecosystem fit.
• Full customizability: Adapts to any goal-setting framework your organization uses. Customize templates, terminology, and workflows to match your processes — no more forcing teams into a rigid OKR-only structure.
• Advanced reporting and dashboards: Mooncamp's dashboards provide real-time insights into progress and performance. Create custom views for company overviews to Quarterly Business Reviews without manual data compilation — directly addressing Viva Goals' most cited reporting limitation.

• Visual goal alignment: Strategy maps and goal cascades show how every objective connects to organizational strategy, helping teams understand their role in the bigger picture.
• Built-in check-ins: Regular check-ins keep teams focused on what matters most, with automated reminders and easy progress updates.
• Intuitive design: Clean interface that makes goal tracking straightforward. Teams can get started quickly without the extensive training that Viva Goals required.

Pros

• Highly flexible and customizable to fit any goal-setting framework
• Intuitive interface with minimal learning curve
• Expert support team provides hands-on guidance
• Powerful reporting without manual data compilation
• Seamless integrations with Microsoft Teams, Slack, and more

Cons

• No free plan — trial available, but no permanent free tier
• No dedicated mobile app yet (can be installed as a progressive web app)
• Focused on goals and alignment — no built-in HR or performance review features

Pricing

• Essential: $7.00 per user per month
• Professional: $10.00 per user per month
• Enterprise: Custom pricing

Best suited for

Scale-ups and enterprises migrating from Viva Goals that need a flexible, Microsoft Teams-integrated OKR platform without the rigidity and reporting limitations they experienced before.

User ratings

G2: 4.8/5 (based on 290+ reviews)

2. Profit.co

Profit.co is a comprehensive strategy execution and performance management platform that combines OKRs, Balanced Scorecard methodology, and continuous performance management in a single system. Trusted by over 1,000 companies including 50 Fortune 500 organizations, it is recognized as a G2 Leader in the OKR category for 18 consecutive quarters.

Where Viva Goals offered a bare-bones OKR experience within the Microsoft ecosystem, Profit.co delivers a deeper OKR feature set with AI-powered goal creation, task management, and gamified employee rewards. For organizations that found Viva Goals' reporting and customization options too limited, Profit.co provides more advanced analytics and a broader range of integrations beyond Microsoft.

Key features

• AI-powered OKR creation: AI agents help draft objectives, suggest key results, and analyze goal quality — streamlining a process that often stalls during planning cycles.
• Reward-driven engagement: A gamified system with badges and leaderboards recognizes employees for hitting targets, boosting participation and making progress visible company-wide.
• Built-in execution layer: Integrated task management and meeting tools connect daily work to key results so nothing falls through the cracks between strategy and action.
• Vendor-neutral integration library: Over 100 native connectors — including Microsoft Teams, Jira, Slack, Salesforce, and HubSpot — provide far broader connectivity than Viva Goals' Microsoft-only approach.

Pros

• Feature set spans OKRs, Balanced Scorecard, task management, and performance reviews in one platform
• Rated 100/100 for customer support on Capterra, with OKR coaching available
• Integration library of 100+ native connectors works across any tech stack
• Free tier for up to 5 users allows teams to test before committing budget

Cons

• Wealth of features demands a deliberate onboarding plan — teams should not expect instant productivity
• Some navigation paths feel unintuitive, particularly for infrequent actions
• Jira integration has known limitations around KPI-type key results
• Full platform value only emerges after teams invest in structured training

Pricing

Profit.co starts with a Free plan for up to 5 users. The Growth plan is $9.00 per user per month, or $7.00 per user per month with annual billing. Enterprise plans are priced on a custom basis.

Best suited for

Mid-sized to enterprise companies (50-5,000+ employees) looking for a feature-rich OKR platform with performance management capabilities, particularly those that found Viva Goals too limited in analytics and integrations. See also: Profit.co alternatives.

User ratings

G2: 4.7/5

3. ClearPoint Strategy

ClearPoint Strategy is a strategy management platform that combines goal-setting, execution tracking, and automated reporting with built-in support for the Balanced Scorecard framework. It is designed for organizations that need to connect strategic planning to operational execution with data-driven visibility at every level.

Viva Goals was limited to OKRs, but ClearPoint Strategy supports multiple strategic frameworks including Balanced Scorecard, strategic plans, and KPI dashboards. For organizations whose strategic needs extend beyond OKRs — particularly those in government, healthcare, and education — ClearPoint offers a more comprehensive approach to strategy management than Viva Goals ever provided.

Key features

• Balanced Scorecard support: Built-in tools for the Balanced Scorecard framework help align business activities with overall strategy across financial, customer, process, and learning perspectives.
• AI-driven insights: Leverage AI for data analysis, identifying trends, and making proactive adjustments to strategy execution.
• Strategy maps: Visual representations of how different goals and initiatives interconnect, making it easier for teams to understand their contribution to the broader strategy.
• Automated data collection: Reduces manual entry by automatically pulling data from various sources, enhancing data accuracy and saving reporting time.

Pros

• Multi-framework support means organizations can run Balanced Scorecard, OKRs, and custom strategic plans within a single platform
• Report automation saves significant time for teams responsible for executive presentations and board reports
• Strategy maps provide a visual line-of-sight that connects individual initiatives to top-level strategic objectives
• The customer success team provides hands-on guidance throughout implementation and ongoing usage

Cons

• Per-user pricing is substantially higher than most dedicated OKR tools, which can be a barrier for smaller organizations
• Initial configuration and setup require more effort and training than lighter-weight goal-tracking alternatives
• The platform is designed primarily for strategy offices and leadership teams, making company-wide adoption less natural
• The integration library is more limited than some competitors with broader ecosystems

Pricing

• Starter: $250.00 for 5 users per month
• Pro: $800.00 for 10 users per month
• Enterprise: Custom pricing

Best suited for

Mid-sized to large organizations (100-5,000+ employees) in government, healthcare, education, or other sectors where Balanced Scorecard and structured strategic planning are essential — particularly those whose needs extend well beyond Viva Goals' OKR-only approach. See also: ClearPoint Strategy alternatives.

User ratings

G2: 4.7/5

4. Betterworks

Betterworks is a performance enablement platform designed for large enterprises that need to connect goals, feedback, and performance conversations into one continuous system. The platform uses generative AI to help teams write stronger, more aligned goals and provides intelligent nudges to keep updates consistent, with particular strength in calibration tools for performance discussions.

Unlike Viva Goals, which focused solely on OKRs without connecting to performance management, Betterworks bridges goal-setting with continuous feedback and performance reviews. For enterprises that need more than just goal tracking — and found Viva Goals disconnected from their broader talent processes — Betterworks offers a tighter integration between strategy execution and people development.

Key features

• Integrated performance review cycles: Run configurable review periods — quarterly, semi-annual, or annual — with goal attainment data automatically pulled into evaluation forms.
• Real-time feedback channels: Managers and peers can share in-the-moment feedback tied to specific goals, building a continuous record that informs formal reviews.
• Organizational goal mapping: A top-down view shows how company priorities cascade into departmental and individual targets, with rollup metrics that track aggregate progress.
• Compensation and talent grid integration: Combine calibration scores with goal data to build nine-box talent grids that inform promotion and compensation decisions.

Pros

• Goal achievement data feeds directly into performance reviews, eliminating manual data gathering at review time
• The continuous feedback model builds a richer performance record than point-in-time annual surveys
• Onboarding resources and customer success support help large organizations get productive quickly
• The platform handles multi-entity structures well, supporting organizations with distinct business units

Cons

• Customization boundaries become apparent when replicating highly specific internal processes
• The analytics layer covers HR-centric metrics but provides limited depth for operational performance tracking
• Resolution of non-critical bugs tends to lag behind expectations
• Upfront cost comparison is difficult since pricing is entirely quote-based with no published tiers

Pricing

• All pricing is determined through direct consultation with Betterworks sales
• External sources estimate a baseline of roughly $7.00 per user per month

Reach out to Betterworks for a quote tailored to your organization.

Best suited for

Mid-to-large enterprises (500-10,000+ employees) that want to connect goal management with performance enablement, particularly those that found Viva Goals too siloed from their talent management processes. See also: Betterworks alternatives.

User ratings

G2: 4.3/5

5. Jira Align

Jira Align, part of the Atlassian suite, is an enterprise agile planning platform designed for large organizations practicing agile at scale. It connects team-level work in Jira to program, portfolio, and strategic objectives, providing visibility from individual tasks to enterprise strategy.

Viva Goals was built for the Microsoft ecosystem; Jira Align is built for the Atlassian ecosystem. For organizations that rely on Jira for development and project management, Jira Align provides a native connection between day-to-day execution and strategic goals that Viva Goals could not match. However, its enterprise pricing and complexity make it best suited for large-scale agile organizations rather than general-purpose goal tracking.

Key features

• Scaled Agile Framework support: Built-in support for SAFe, enabling large organizations to implement and manage agile practices across multiple teams and portfolios.
• Real-time visibility: Provides real-time visibility from team-level tasks to strategic initiatives, helping stakeholders stay aligned across the entire organization.
• Roadmapping tools: Visual roadmaps allow organizations to plan, track, and communicate their strategic goals over time.
• Portfolio management: Aligns agile teams' work with business objectives through robust portfolio management tools connecting sprints to strategy.

Pros

• The native Jira integration creates a direct bridge from agile execution to strategic planning that no third-party tool can replicate
• Comprehensive SAFe support makes it the default choice for enterprises undergoing large-scale agile transformations
• Real-time portfolio views connect work happening at the team level to enterprise-wide strategic objectives
• Long-term roadmapping and planning tools provide the visibility leaders need for multi-quarter strategic initiatives

Cons

• The $27,000 annual minimum effectively excludes most small and mid-sized organizations from consideration
• Implementation requires significant effort, with a complex setup process that extends the time to value
• A hard dependency on Jira as the underlying work management layer limits the platform's appeal beyond the Atlassian ecosystem
• The platform is over-engineered for simple OKR or goal tracking requirements

Pricing

• Standard: Starting from $27,000 per year (30 Full Users + 120 Integrated Users)
• Enterprise: Starting from $46,440 per year (30 Full Users + 120 Integrated Users)

Note: Jira Align requires a minimum of 30 users.

Best suited for

Large enterprises (500-10,000+ employees) practicing agile at scale within the Atlassian ecosystem, particularly those that need to connect team-level Jira work to portfolio and strategy-level objectives. See also: Jira Align alternatives.

User ratings

G2: 3.9/5

6. Perdoo

Perdoo is a dedicated OKR and strategy execution platform from Germany, designed to help organizations build better strategies and drive faster execution. It combines OKRs, KPIs, and strategy mapping in a single system, with a particular focus on making goal-setting accessible for companies new to the OKR framework through a clean, intuitive interface.

Where Viva Goals required deep familiarity with both OKRs and the Microsoft ecosystem, Perdoo takes a simpler approach with a gentle learning curve and a free tier for small teams. For organizations that found Viva Goals overwhelming and just need a focused, affordable tool for tracking OKRs and KPIs, Perdoo offers a more accessible starting point.

Key features

• Combined OKR and KPI tracking: Both goal types managed in one workspace — something Viva Goals never supported — so teams can track strategic outcomes and operational performance side by side.
• Strategy Map: A visual tool that shows the full cascade from organizational strategy to team and individual goals, making alignment visible at every level without the overhead of navigating Microsoft's ecosystem.
• Roadmap planning: Timeline-based views that lay out strategic initiatives against quarterly and annual OKR cycles, providing temporal context for execution planning.
• Built-in learning resources: An academy of courses and guides that help teams adopt OKR methodology from scratch, reducing the need for external consultants or coaches.

Pros

• The learning curve is far gentler than Viva Goals, with a clean interface that new users can navigate confidently within hours
• Strategy Map visualization creates instant organizational clarity that Viva Goals never offered natively
• A free tier for up to 5 users gives teams a genuine way to evaluate the platform before spending
• Support team is responsive and takes an active interest in helping organizations succeed with their OKR programs

Cons

• The mobile experience lags behind the desktop version, making on-the-go check-ins less fluid than they should be
• OKR display and progress calculation options are limited, which may frustrate teams with specific scoring requirements
• The integration ecosystem is narrower than Microsoft's, and some available connectors have occasional sync issues
• Tracing how individual goals contribute to company-level objectives requires some manual mapping

Pricing

Perdoo keeps pricing straightforward with three tiers. A Free plan supports up to 5 users. Premium costs $6.40 per user per month and unlocks additional alignment and reporting features. Supreme at $8.00 per user per month provides the complete platform including KPI boards and advanced integrations.

Best suited for

Small to mid-sized companies (10-500 employees) new to OKRs who want an affordable, focused strategy execution tool — especially those that found Viva Goals too complex for their team's needs. See also: Perdoo alternatives.

User ratings

G2: 4.5/5

7. WorkBoard

WorkBoard is an enterprise OKR management platform that combines goal-setting with built-in OKR coaching and strategic alignment tools. It is designed for large organizations that need help not just tracking goals but building a disciplined OKR practice across the company.

While Viva Goals provided the tracking mechanics for OKRs, it lacked guidance on how to write, align, and execute them effectively. WorkBoard fills that gap with coaching tools and methodology support that help teams master OKRs, not just manage them. For organizations that struggled with Viva Goals adoption due to a lack of OKR expertise, WorkBoard's coaching-first approach can be a better fit.

Key features

• Integrated OKR methodology coaching: Step-by-step guidance embedded throughout the platform helps teams craft well-structured objectives and measurable key results — directly addressing adoption struggles common among Viva Goals users.
• Live performance dashboards: Always-current visibility into OKR progress, enabling rapid course corrections before goals drift off track.
• Flexible goal iteration: Support for mid-cycle adjustments lets teams reprioritize objectives in response to shifting market conditions or strategic pivots.
• Cross-team coordination tooling: Shared objectives and co-owned key results keep departments in lockstep, even in organizations with complex matrices.

Pros

• Coaching-first approach actively builds OKR capability across the organization, not just tracking compliance
• Real-time dashboards ensure leadership always has a current picture of progress
• Alignment features effectively connect individual work to company-level strategy
• Meets enterprise security, compliance, and data governance requirements

Cons

• At an estimated ~$50 per user per month, it is one of the most expensive options available
• The sheer number of features creates a meaningful learning curve, especially for teams new to OKRs
• Visual design feels less modern than competitors that have launched more recently
• Pricing and plan details are not available publicly, complicating procurement evaluation

Pricing

• Pricing is not listed publicly — all plans are custom-quoted, with third-party estimates placing per-user costs near $50.00 per month

Prospective buyers should contact WorkBoard directly for a proposal.

Best suited for

Large enterprises (500-5,000+ employees) that need OKR coaching alongside goal tracking, particularly those that struggled with Viva Goals adoption due to a lack of methodology support. See also: WorkBoard alternatives.

User ratings

G2: 4.5/5

8. Leapsome

Leapsome is an all-in-one people enablement platform that combines performance reviews, goals and OKRs, employee engagement surveys, learning paths, continuous feedback, and compensation management into a single system. It serves over 1,500 companies worldwide including Spotify and monday.com.

Viva Goals was a pure goal management tool with no connection to performance reviews, engagement, or learning. Leapsome takes the opposite approach by embedding OKRs within a broader people management ecosystem. For organizations that want to connect goal-setting with employee development, feedback, and performance reviews in a single platform, Leapsome offers a more holistic solution than Viva Goals ever did.

Key features

• Performance-linked goal management: OKR tracking is directly connected to performance review outcomes, so managers can evaluate goal achievement within the same workflow as formal assessments.
• Built-in survey infrastructure: Run engagement surveys on flexible schedules, collecting satisfaction data and feedback that feeds into analytics dashboards with trend tracking.
• Continuous upskilling paths: Learning modules align with organizational goals, enabling employees to develop skills that support both their career growth and company strategy.
• Structured feedback loops: Ongoing 360-degree feedback and structured check-ins keep development conversations active between formal review cycles.

Pros

• Comprehensive people platform that ties goal outcomes directly to performance evaluations and development planning
• Performance review and feedback features are among the most robust in the category
• Integrates with major HRIS systems and workplace tools like Slack and Jira for connected workflows
• Consistent product investment with frequent feature releases and platform improvements

Cons

• Adding engagement, learning, and compensation modules to the base subscription raises per-user costs quickly
• The user interface can require multiple navigation steps to reach specific reviews or data points
• No API exists for programmatic goal updates, so every OKR modification is a manual process
• Initial implementation is more involved than focused OKR tools, requiring dedicated setup effort

Pricing

• Starts at approximately $8.00 per user per month with modular pricing based on which capabilities are activated

Contact Leapsome for a quote.

Best suited for

Mid-sized to large organizations (200-5,000 employees) that want to integrate goal tracking with performance reviews, engagement surveys, and employee development in a single platform, particularly European companies requiring strong GDPR compliance. See also: Leapsome alternatives.

User ratings

G2: 4.8/5

9. Weekdone

Weekdone is a streamlined OKR tool designed for smaller organizations seeking a simple way to set, track, and report on goals without unnecessary complexity. It focuses on weekly progress reporting and team alignment, making it particularly well-suited for small teams that want OKR benefits without the overhead of enterprise platforms.

Viva Goals was built for large Microsoft-centric organizations and required significant setup and training. Weekdone takes the opposite approach — it is intentionally lightweight, with a free tier for up to 3 users and a focus on getting teams started with OKRs quickly. For small teams that found Viva Goals too complex and expensive for their needs, Weekdone offers a simpler entry point.

Key features

• Visual weekly and quarterly reports: Progress dashboards display goal status across both weekly and quarterly timeframes, letting managers see immediate momentum and longer-term trajectory in one place.
• Goal boards with status tracking: Objectives are laid out in a visual board format with clear status markers, maintaining team-wide clarity on what is progressing and what needs intervention.
• Methodology coaching tools: Coaching resources built into the platform guide teams through OKR best practices, from writing effective key results to running productive goal reviews.
• Ready-made OKR templates: Industry-specific and role-based templates let teams launch their first OKR cycle quickly, removing the blank-page problem that slows initial adoption.

Pros

• A clean, focused interface makes goal tracking accessible even for teams with no prior OKR experience
• The free tier (up to 3 users) lets teams validate the approach before spending anything
• Weekly reporting creates a steady cadence of alignment without the administrative burden of heavier platforms
• Onboarding resources and coaching are strong enough to replace standalone OKR training programs

Cons

• Goal structures and workflows lack the depth required by organizations with complex hierarchies
• The overall feature set is basic when measured against full-scale enterprise OKR platforms
• Analytical and reporting capabilities plateau quickly for teams that want to slice data in multiple ways
• Integration options are fewer than what larger, more established competitors provide

Pricing

• Free: Up to 3 users
• Paid: Starting at $108.00 per month for 4-10 users

Best suited for

Small teams and startups (3-50 employees) that need lightweight weekly goal tracking with built-in OKR coaching, particularly teams new to the framework that want an affordable, guided entry point. See also: Weekdone alternatives.

User ratings

G2: 4.5/5

10. Tability

Tability is a lightweight goal management platform designed for distributed teams that need a simple system to track goals and maintain alignment across locations and time zones. It uses AI-powered insights to help teams identify risks and optimize goal progress proactively.

Viva Goals required real-time coordination within the Microsoft ecosystem, which did not serve remote and distributed teams well. Tability takes a different approach with asynchronous check-ins and collaborative dashboards that work across time zones, making it a natural fit for remote-first organizations. For teams that found Viva Goals' synchronous workflow too rigid for distributed work, Tability offers more flexibility.

Key features

• Proactive AI guidance: The AI layer continuously evaluates goal progress and delivers targeted suggestions when trajectories shift, helping distributed teams stay ahead of problems rather than reacting to them.
• Time-zone-friendly check-ins: Contributors update progress whenever it fits their schedule, and the system aggregates responses into a unified team view — no overlapping calendar slots required.
• Shareable progress snapshots: Generate read-only links to goal summaries that stakeholders anywhere in the organization can access, ensuring alignment without requiring everyone to log into the platform.
• Unified team dashboards: A shared workspace where all goal activity is visible in one place, giving distributed teams a single source of truth regardless of where each member is located.

Pros

• Deploys quickly with almost no setup overhead, so teams can begin tracking goals the same day
• Built around async workflows, making it one of the strongest options for remote-first and multi-timezone teams
• AI-powered suggestions flag at-risk goals early, giving managers a chance to intervene before deadlines pass
• Cost remains low across all tiers, keeping the tool accessible for organizations of any size

Cons

• Feature depth is deliberately limited, trading breadth for simplicity compared to enterprise OKR suites
• Complex goal hierarchies spanning many organizational layers are harder to model effectively
• The integration library, while growing, does not yet match the breadth of longer-established platforms
• Reporting stays functional but basic, lacking the configurability that dedicated strategy tools provide

Pricing

• Basic: $4.00 per user per month
• Plus: $5.00 per user per month
• Premium: $8.00 per user per month

Best suited for

Small to mid-sized distributed teams (5-200 employees) that need lightweight, async-friendly goal tracking — particularly remote-first organizations that found Viva Goals' Microsoft-centric workflow too rigid. See also: Tability alternatives.

User ratings

G2: 4.7/5

How to choose the best Viva Goals alternative for your team?

With Viva Goals discontinued, choosing a replacement is not optional — but rushing the decision can create more problems than it solves. Here is how to evaluate your options systematically.

1. Determine whether Microsoft ecosystem integration is essential

If your organization is deeply embedded in Microsoft 365, prioritize tools with strong Teams, Outlook, and Power BI integrations. Mooncamp offers a native-like Microsoft Teams experience that mirrors what Viva Goals provided, while Jira Align is the better choice for Atlassian-centric organizations. Do not assume you need to stay in the Microsoft ecosystem if your workflows have evolved.

2. Identify your primary goal management need

Viva Goals was OKR-only. If that worked for your team, a focused OKR platform like Mooncamp, Perdoo, or Weekdone will serve you well. If you need broader capabilities — strategy execution with Balanced Scorecard (ClearPoint Strategy), performance enablement (Betterworks), or people management (Leapsome) — define that scope before shortlisting tools.

3. Evaluate migration complexity and vendor support

Switching from a discontinued platform is stressful enough without a difficult migration. Check whether each vendor offers migration assistance, data import tools, and dedicated onboarding support. Mooncamp offers a free migration service specifically for Viva Goals customers, which can significantly reduce transition friction.

4. Calculate total cost of ownership

Viva Goals was bundled with Microsoft Viva licenses, so the incremental cost felt low. As a standalone purchase, your new tool's pricing structure matters more. Factor in per-user costs, implementation time, training expenses, and any productivity lost during transition. Free tiers from Perdoo, Weekdone, and Profit.co let you test before committing budget.

5. Test with real OKR cycles during the trial

Do not evaluate tools using demo data alone. Run a real quarterly OKR cycle with a pilot team during the trial period. This reveals whether the tool handles your actual workflows — including cross-departmental objectives, cascading goals, and the reporting formats your leadership requires.

6. Match tool complexity to your team size

Enterprise tools like Jira Align and WorkBoard are powerful but demand significant setup and training investment. Small teams will get more value from lightweight tools like Weekdone or Tability. Mid-sized organizations should look at Mooncamp, Perdoo, or Profit.co for the right balance of capability and usability.

7. Verify reporting meets your executive requirements

One of the most common frustrations with Viva Goals was its basic reporting. During evaluation, test whether each alternative can generate the specific outputs your leadership needs — board presentations, QBR dashboards, department scorecards, or alignment views. Mooncamp and ClearPoint Strategy both excel at executive reporting, but their approaches differ.

8. Involve end users early in the evaluation

The best-featured tool fails if employees do not adopt it. Viva Goals' steep learning curve was a primary reason for low engagement. Run a short pilot with a cross-functional group, gather feedback on usability and daily workflow fit, and let their experience guide the final decision. A phased rollout starting with one team reduces risk and builds internal advocates for broader adoption.

Conclusion

Viva Goals' shutdown means every organization that relied on it needs a new home for their goal management practice — and this transition is an opportunity to upgrade, not just replace. The right alternative depends on what held your team back with Viva Goals: was it the rigid OKR framework, the basic reporting, the limited integrations, or the steep learning curve? Start there when building your shortlist.

Run parallel evaluations with two or three finalists using real OKR cycles, not demo environments. Involve the team members who will use the tool daily, test the specific integrations you need, and verify that reporting meets your leadership's expectations. The transition from Viva Goals does not have to be painful — but it does require deliberate evaluation rather than defaulting to the most familiar option.

If you are looking for a platform that picks up where Viva Goals left off — with a powerful Microsoft Teams integration, flexible goal frameworks, and the reporting depth that Viva Goals lacked — Mooncamp is built for exactly this transition. With a free migration service for Viva Goals customers, expert onboarding support, and customizable dashboards, your team can be up and running quickly.

Ready to make the switch? Start a free trial or book a demo with our team.

Frequently asked questions