Profit.co vs Tability: Which is better in 2026?

Choosing between a feature-packed strategy execution suite and a streamlined goal tracker comes down to what your organization values more: depth or speed.

Profit.co bundles OKR management with performance reviews, project portfolio tracking, and employee engagement into a single platform serving over 1,000 companies worldwide.

Tability takes the opposite approach, stripping goal tracking down to its essentials and relying on AI coaching and weekly check-in rhythms to keep teams focused without onboarding overhead.

The difference shows up fast in daily use: one tool wants to be your operating system for strategy execution, while the other wants to be the lightest layer between your team and its goals.

I tested both platforms side by side to see where each excels and where it falls short, plus a bonus pick for teams that need more flexibility than either tool provides.

What's new in Profit.co?

Profit.co shipped several enterprise-focused updates in early 2026. Department-level visibility settings now enforce consistent access controls on new OKRs, and a dual-license tier model separates full-access from read-only licenses for tighter seat management.

Risks and issues tracking at the Key Result level brings project-style risk management directly into OKR workflows. A refreshed KPI Summary View also surfaces Key Results across all hierarchy levels in a single screen.

What's new in Tability?

Tability introduced AI-powered retrospectives that automatically summarize weekly check-ins across a quarter and surface actionable insights. This feature turns raw check-in data into structured narrative summaries without manual effort.

Updated pricing took effect in January 2026, raising the Basic plan to $6/user/month and Premium to $10/user/month on annual billing. Existing customers are grandfathered until July 2026.

Profit.co vs Tability — in a nutshell

Profit.co operates as a full strategy execution engine, routing OKRs through task management, performance reviews, and portfolio dashboards in a single integrated environment. Tability operates as a purpose-built goal tracker that prioritizes weekly accountability and AI-assisted planning over platform breadth.

The practical gap is significant. Organizations that need performance reviews, project portfolios, and recognition programs alongside their OKRs will find everything under one roof with Profit.co, while teams that simply want to set goals and check in weekly will be productive in Tability within an hour.

Here is how the two platforms stack up across the categories that matter most, with Mooncamp included as a third reference point.

Tability's transparent pricing vs Profit.co's hidden quotes

Tability publishes its pricing openly, making it easy to calculate costs before starting a trial. The Basic plan at $6.00 per user per month (annual) covers AI goal setting, check-ins, strategy maps, initiatives, and Slack integration. The Premium plan at $10.00 per user per month (annual) adds custom dashboards, automated check-ins, AI retrospectives, SAML SSO, and two free read-only seats per paid seat.

No minimum seat requirements and no credit card for the 14-day trial lower the barrier to entry. For a 50-person team on Premium, the annual cost comes to $6,000, which is straightforward to budget and approve.

Tability subscription plans

Billed annually. Monthly billing available at $7.00 and $12.00 respectively.

Profit.co uses a module-based pricing model where organizations select which capabilities they need (OKRs, Performance Management, PPM, Balanced Scorecard) and receive a personalized quote after a demo call. A free Launch plan exists for teams exploring the OKR framework, but there is no public per-user price for paid tiers.

I found the quoting process added days to the evaluation timeline compared to Tability's self-serve model. Third-party sources suggest a Growth plan around $9.00 per user per month, but Profit.co does not confirm this on their site.

Profit.co subscription plans

Tability wins on pricing clarity and accessibility. Teams can calculate their exact spend, sign up, and start tracking goals without waiting for a sales conversation. Profit.co's approach may offer better value for organizations that need multiple modules bundled, but the opacity adds friction to the buying process.

Tability's focused design outpaces Profit.co's feature-rich maze

Profit.co's interface reflects the scope of its platform. Seven top-level modules line the left sidebar, each branching into its own set of sub-views and configuration screens. For OKRs alone, there are eight distinct layouts — list, heatmap, alignment tree, Gantt, and more — offering multiple angles on the same data.

The density pays off for power users who want granular control, but common actions often sit two or three clicks deep. Teams new to OKRs will need guided onboarding to feel comfortable navigating the multi-layered menu system.

Tability's interface feels immediately navigable. A compact sidebar with search, plans, strategy map, channels, and people gives access to everything the platform offers. The goal detail view organizes progress charts, check-in history, alignment context, and tasks into a single scrollable screen.

The design philosophy is deliberate subtraction. Every screen serves one purpose, and there are no hidden panels or collapsed menus to discover. New team members contribute their first check-in within minutes of receiving an invite.

Profit.co's enterprise OKR engine vs Tability's quality-first simplicity

Profit.co approaches goal management with structural depth. OKRs cascade across individual, team, department, and corporate levels with configurable alignment rules. The platform supports Balanced Scorecard methodology alongside OKRs, and AI-powered authoring helps teams draft Key Results with measurable targets.

Strategy roadmaps connect long-term vision statements to quarterly objectives, creating a top-down thread from mission to daily execution. A heatmap view color-codes departmental progress ranges, surfacing at-risk areas without drilling into individual goals.

Tability takes a leaner path. Its plan editor includes an OKR quality score (rated on Focus, Descriptiveness, Measurability, and Accountability) that coaches users toward well-structured goals as they write them. I found this guardrail particularly effective for teams rolling out OKRs for the first time.

AI-assisted goal creation generates full plan drafts in minutes, and the strategy map view shows cross-team alignment without requiring manual configuration. The weekly check-in cadence keeps goals visible, but the goal hierarchy stays deliberately shallow compared to enterprise cascading tools.

Profit.co's operational dashboards vs Tability's confidence-driven insights

Profit.co's reporting centers on its Cockpit view, which organizes dashboards across Plan, Execute, Engage, and Learn phases. Donut charts break down organizational objectives and Key Results by status (on track, at risk, behind), while heatmap reports color-code departmental progress in a single glance.

Power BI integration extends analytical depth for organizations that need cross-platform data visualization. The KPI Summary View rolls up Key Results across all hierarchy levels, making it possible to scan hundreds of metrics without switching screens.

Tability's reporting revolves around its Net Confidence Score, a single metric that aggregates team sentiment on whether goals will be hit. Trends dashboards chart Key Results vs. Tasks progress and confidence shifts over time, giving a pulse-like view of goal health.

TV mode and public sharing links make it easy to display progress on office screens or share with external stakeholders. I appreciated the AI retrospectives feature, which automatically distills quarterly check-in data into narrative summaries with actionable next steps, though custom dashboard building is limited to Premium users.

Profit.co's all-in-one suite dwarfs Tability's focused toolkit

Profit.co is better understood as a business operating system than a standalone goal tracker. The platform bundles project portfolio management, performance reviews, employee engagement, and meeting management alongside OKRs, which means teams that would otherwise stitch together four or five SaaS subscriptions can consolidate into one.

The PPM Cockpit is the most distinctive piece. It surfaces Gantt-style project timelines, resource allocation, and financial reporting widgets tied directly to strategic objectives. I found it particularly useful for organizations that want to answer "are our projects actually moving the goals forward?" without switching tools.

Tability stays intentionally narrow. Initiatives with kanban boards connect execution items to Key Results, and daily or weekly standups capture blockers and priorities. The Tabby AI Coach analyzes goal progress and suggests corrective actions, acting as an always-available strategy advisor.

The trade-off is clear: Tability relies on integrations for anything beyond goal tracking. Performance reviews, surveys, recognition, and project management all live in external tools that teams must stitch together themselves.

Profit.co's 100+ connectors vs Tability's curated integration set

Profit.co's integration library tops 100 native connectors, and the standout feature is the depth of certain connections. The Jira integration supports bi-directional syncing so task completions in Jira automatically update key result progress. Salesforce connectors pipe revenue and pipeline data directly into OKRs, and Power BI feeds let teams blend goal data with broader business metrics.

Beyond those deep connectors, the catalog covers CRM, HRIS, DevOps, communication, and data warehouse tools. Zapier fills gaps for niche apps. I noticed that depth varies across the library — flagship integrations like Jira and Salesforce are significantly more capable than some of the lighter connectors.

Tability integrates with roughly 25 tools, covering communication (Slack, Microsoft Teams), project management (Jira, Asana, ClickUp, Linear, Shortcut), documentation (Notion, Confluence, Miro), and data sources (Google Sheets, Amplitude, ChartMogul, Power BI, Tableau). A check-ins API allows custom automations for unsupported platforms.

Most integrations beyond Slack require the Premium tier. The curated set covers modern development and product teams well, but organizations with Salesforce, Azure DevOps, or data warehouse dependencies will find gaps.

Profit.co's always-on support edges out Tability's tiered model

Profit.co provides 24/7 live chat, email, and phone support across all plan tiers. An OKR University offers structured certification programs and educational resources for teams ramping up on the methodology. Onboarding assistance is included, and the support team is consistently highlighted for proactive follow-ups and rapid response times.

The combination of phone access and around-the-clock availability is rare among OKR platforms. I found the live chat response time consistently under a few minutes during my testing.

Tability limits support availability by tier. Basic plan users receive help during local business hours, Premium users get 24/7 support, and Enterprise customers receive a dedicated Customer Success Manager with structured onboarding and quarterly reviews. Documentation and a feature request portal are available to all users.

The quality of Tability's support is solid when available, but the tiered structure means Basic users may wait until the next business day for responses. There is no phone support on any tier.

Final call: Profit.co vs Tability

Profit.co is the stronger platform in this head-to-head. It takes five of seven categories, delivering deeper goal management, broader integrations, more built-in features, and more accessible support.

Tability earns meaningful wins on pricing transparency and user interface. For small teams that need a fast, affordable way to adopt OKRs without a sales cycle or onboarding program, it remains the more practical starting point.

The core trade-off is scope vs. speed. Profit.co rewards organizations willing to invest time in setup and training with a platform that covers strategy execution end to end. Tability rewards teams that want to start tracking goals this week and iterate from there.

Outgrowing Profit.co or Tability? Try Mooncamp

Profit.co asks teams to navigate a dense multi-module environment to manage strategy. Tability keeps things simple but caps out when organizations need structural depth or tailored analytics. Mooncamp occupies the space between these extremes, providing a platform that scales from small teams to enterprise rollouts without forcing a choice between usability and capability.

Built for scale-ups and enterprises that run strategy across multiple frameworks and reporting audiences, Mooncamp lets organizations define their own goal architecture while keeping the daily experience clean enough for every team member to use without training.

• Effortless adoption at scale: A modern, minimalist interface that teams across departments navigate confidently on day one, removing the training overhead that Profit.co requires and the depth ceiling that Tability imposes.
• Goal architecture shaped by your methodology: Build custom goal types, statuses, progress models, and workflows that reflect how your organization actually runs strategy, whether that is OKRs, SMART goals, V2MOMs, or a hybrid unique to your company.
• Reporting tailored to every audience: Assemble fully customizable dashboards and charts that deliver board-level summaries, department-level heatmaps, or team-level progress views from the same live data set, without fixed layouts or external BI tools.
• Deep connectivity across your stack: Native integrations with Jira, Power BI, MS Planner, and Slack, alongside the most advanced Microsoft Teams integration on the market, keep goals synchronized with the systems teams already rely on.