Atlassian Goals (formerly Atlas) is a free goal-tracking application embedded directly into the Atlassian Cloud platform. It allows teams to define objectives and link them to Jira work items, projects, and Jira Product Discovery ideas — giving stakeholders cross-team visibility into progress without leaving the Atlassian ecosystem.
The tight Atlassian integration is useful for organizations already invested in Jira and Confluence, but it comes with real constraints. Reporting is surface-level, with no custom dashboards, heatmaps, or QBR-ready analytics. The goal management itself stays lightweight — there are no weighted key results, cascading alignment views, or structured check-in workflows to drive accountability. And because Goals is locked to the Atlassian platform, organizations with mixed tooling environments cannot unify goal tracking for every team in a single place.
The following 12 alternatives offer deeper OKR management, stronger reporting, and broader platform flexibility for teams that have outgrown what Atlassian Goals provides.
Mooncamp: Purpose-built strategy execution platform with the deep customization, advanced dashboards, and structured check-ins that Atlassian Goals lacks — without locking you into a single ecosystem.
Profit.co: Full-lifecycle OKR platform with 8 visualization views, built-in task management, and a free tier for small teams needing far more depth than basic goal tracking.
Perdoo: Clean, dedicated strategy execution tool combining OKRs with KPI boards and strategy maps — ideal for teams that want strategic context alongside goal tracking.
Best Atlassian Goals alternatives at a glance
Tool | Best For | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
Flexible strategy execution with advanced reporting | Customizable frameworks, visual alignment, real-time dashboards, automated check-ins | |
Full-lifecycle OKR management | 8 OKR views, task management, AI goal authoring, 100+ integrations | |
OKR and KPI tracking with strategy maps | Strategy maps, KPI boards, engagement health dashboards, multi-language support | |
Affordable, AI-assisted goal tracking | AI goal setting, automated check-ins, presentation-ready reports, strategy maps | |
Enterprise strategy execution and planning | Strategy planning, cascading goals, performance dashboards, strategy maps | |
OKRs within performance management | Goal alignment, continuous feedback, AI goal writing, calibration workflows | |
Manager effectiveness and weekly check-ins | Weekly check-ins, OKR tracking, engagement surveys, AI coaching | |
Fortune 500 strategy execution | AI agents, executive briefs, scorecards, heatmap views | |
Simple OKR tracking with coaching | Quarterly OKRs, weekly status reports, pulse surveys, included coaching | |
OKRs with leadership development | AI goal creation, performance dashboards, leadership content, recognition | |
OKR management inside Microsoft Teams | OKRs in Teams, goal cascading, Power BI reporting, approval flows | |
OKR management within Jira | Deep Jira integration, custom OKR levels, KPI dashboards, cross-platform support |
Why look for Atlassian Goals alternatives?
Atlassian Goals is a solid starting point for organizations already using Jira that want basic visibility into strategic objectives. However, teams with serious goal management needs quickly encounter limits that purpose-built platforms address directly.
- Shallow reporting without advanced analytics: Atlassian Goals offers basic progress tracking, but there are no custom dashboards, heatmaps, or presentation-ready reports for leadership reviews. Organizations that need QBR-ready analytics or board-level reporting must compile data manually outside the platform.
- Lightweight goal management that lacks strategic depth: There is no support for weighted key results, scoring methodologies, or cascading alignment views. Teams running mature OKR programs need more structure than a flat list of objectives linked to Jira tickets.
- Ecosystem lock-in to Atlassian: Goals only works within the Atlassian platform. Organizations with mixed tooling environments — teams on monday.com, Asana, or other project management tools alongside Jira — cannot consolidate goal tracking for everyone in one place.
- Weak accountability and check-in mechanisms: The monthly update cadence is the only built-in rhythm. There are no automated reminders, structured weekly check-in workflows, or engagement dashboards to monitor whether teams are actually adopting the process.
- A gap between free and enterprise: Atlassian Goals is too lightweight for mature OKR programs, and Jira Align — the enterprise alternative within the Atlassian ecosystem — costs $75+/user/month and introduces significant complexity. Many organizations fall between these two products and need a platform that balances depth with usability.
12 best Atlassian Goals alternatives
1. Mooncamp
Mooncamp is a strategy execution platform designed for scale-ups and enterprises that need far more than a lightweight goal-tracking layer inside their project management tool. Where Atlassian Goals provides basic objective visibility tied to the Atlassian ecosystem, Mooncamp delivers the reporting depth, structured check-ins, and cross-tool flexibility that growing OKR programs require.
The core advantage over Atlassian Goals is that Mooncamp works independently of any single ecosystem. It integrates deeply with Jira, Microsoft Teams, Slack, Power BI, and Planner — so every team in the organization can participate in goal tracking regardless of which project management or communication tools they use. Combined with real-time dashboards that eliminate manual reporting and expert implementation support drawn from hundreds of successful rollouts, Mooncamp turns goal management from a passive tracking exercise into an active strategy execution practice.
Key features
- Deep customizability: Tool introductions fail when the platform doesn't reflect how the company actually works. Mooncamp adapts to your specific terminology, goal structures, workflows, and processes — the platform molds to how you work rather than imposing a rigid template.
- Real-time reporting and dashboards: Custom views, company-wide overviews, and presentation-ready reports for QBRs and board meetings — all generated in real time. This directly addresses the manual reporting gap that Atlassian Goals forces teams into.
- Visual alignment and strategy maps: Goal cascades and strategy maps make organizational connectivity visible, showing how every objective connects across teams and levels — the strategic depth that Atlassian Goals does not provide.
- Automated check-ins: Structured progress updates with automated reminders create a consistent accountability rhythm. Weekly or bi-weekly cadences replace Atlassian Goals' passive monthly updates with active engagement tracking.
- Cross-ecosystem integrations: Deep integrations with MS Teams, Slack, Jira, Power BI, and Planner mean your goal management platform is not locked to any single ecosystem — solving one of Atlassian Goals' most fundamental constraints.
- Intuitive design: Clean interface that makes goal tracking straightforward for admins, team leads, and view-only users alike. Teams adopt Mooncamp quickly without extensive training.
Pros
- Highly flexible and customizable for any goal framework, adapting to how your organization already works instead of imposing a rigid structure
- Intuitive design with minimal learning curve — straightforward for admins, team leads, and view-only users alike, requiring minimal training
- Expert customer success team with hands-on onboarding guidance, backed by hundreds of successful OKR rollout implementations worldwide
- Powerful real-time reporting that eliminates manual data compilation for leadership reviews and board meetings
- Deep integrations with MS Teams, Slack, Jira, Power BI, and Planner that plug seamlessly into existing tech stacks
Cons
- No free plan available (free trial only)
- No native mobile app, though a progressive web app (PWA) is available
- Focused purely on strategy execution and goal alignment — does not include HR features like performance reviews or engagement surveys
Pricing
- Essential: $7.00 per user per month
- Professional: $10.00 per user per month
- Enterprise: Custom pricing
Best suited for
Scale-ups and enterprises that have outgrown Atlassian Goals' basic tracking and need a platform with advanced reporting, structured check-ins, and cross-ecosystem flexibility — without the complexity and cost of Jira Align.
User ratings
G2: 4.8/5 (based on 290+ reviews)
The best OKR application I've ever used (and I've tried so many)
"Mooncamp is comprehensive but at the same time so simple to use. I found the learning curve manageable, helped by the fact it is all very intuitive. The UX is great and our team have had no trouble adopting Mooncamp as a daily tool. We now have a company wide view of our strategic objecitves/actions and we really like the check-in functionality - this is driving positive behaviours across the team so we know current state of our big (and small) initiatives."
— Jeremy A., General Manager Strategy & Engagement on G2.com
2. Profit.co
Profit.co is a comprehensive OKR and strategy execution platform that combines goal management with task tracking, employee engagement, balanced scorecard methodology, and 360-degree performance reviews. It provides the full OKR lifecycle from quarterly planning through weekly check-ins, with 8 different views of OKR data and 100+ native integrations.
Where Atlassian Goals offers basic goal tracking tightly coupled to the Atlassian platform, Profit.co delivers a complete standalone OKR ecosystem. Teams get built-in task management, performance reviews, and extensive customization — capabilities that Atlassian Goals never intended to provide. The 100+ integrations also mean Profit.co works across mixed tooling environments, not just within Atlassian.
Key features
- Quarterly planning and cascading: Define company-level objectives and cascade them through departments and teams using weighted alignment, ensuring every goal connects to the broader strategy.
- Real-time progress dashboards: Configurable dashboards aggregate OKR progress across the organization, giving leadership a live view of strategic execution without manual reporting.
- Native mobile experience: Full-featured apps for Android, iOS, and Windows let teams update OKRs, check in on progress, and manage tasks from anywhere.
- Balanced Scorecard methodology: In addition to OKRs, Profit.co supports Balanced Scorecard frameworks, allowing organizations to run both methodologies side by side.
Pros
- Platform-agnostic with 100+ integrations spanning Jira, Slack, Teams, Salesforce, and HubSpot — no vendor lock-in
- Eight distinct visualization views (including Gantt, Heatmap, and Alignment) cater to different stakeholder needs
- Dedicated OKR coaching and 24/7 support help teams adopt the methodology successfully
- Free plan for up to 5 users makes it easy to pilot before committing
Cons
- The sheer number of configuration options can slow down initial setup for smaller teams
- Alignment views become visually dense in large organizations with many nested objectives
- The Jira integration does not handle KPI-style key results well
- Enterprise pricing requires a custom quote, making cost comparison difficult upfront
Pricing
Profit.co offers a three-tier pricing model. A Free plan supports up to 5 users with basic OKR capabilities. The Growth plan costs $9.00 per user per month on a monthly basis, or $7.00 per user per month when billed annually. Enterprise pricing is available on request for larger deployments.
Best suited for
Small to large organizations wanting a full-suite OKR platform with built-in task management and performance tools, especially those needing mobile access and broader integrations than Atlassian provides. See also: Profit.co alternatives.
User ratings
G2: 4.7/5 (based on 476+ reviews)
3. Perdoo
Perdoo is a strategy execution platform that combines OKRs, KPIs, strategy mapping, check-ins, and 1:1s into a single system. It connects strategic goals to daily work and maintains focus across the organization through structured engagement tracking and a clean, lightweight interface.
Atlassian Goals lacks dedicated KPI management and strategic visualization entirely. Perdoo fills that gap with KPI boards that track operational and growth metrics alongside OKRs, plus strategy maps that visually connect organizational strategy to the goals that deliver it. For teams that want strategic context — not just a list of objectives linked to Jira tickets — Perdoo offers a more complete picture.
Key features
- Strategy maps: Lay out the full chain from high-level strategic pillars to the specific OKRs and KPIs that support them, giving everyone a shared picture of organizational direction.
- KPI boards: Dedicated dashboards for monitoring operational and growth metrics alongside OKRs, so business-critical numbers never get buried under goal-tracking workflows.
- Engagement health dashboards: Surface adoption metrics like participation rates and update frequency, highlighting exactly where coaching attention is needed to strengthen the OKR program.
- Kudos and recognition: A public recognition feature that lets team members celebrate execution wins, reinforcing the behaviors that drive strategic results.
Pros
- Bridges the gap between OKR tracking and KPI monitoring in one unified platform, eliminating the need for separate dashboards
- Strategy maps deliver visual clarity that Atlassian Goals simply cannot replicate
- Available in five languages (English, German, Dutch, Spanish, French), which suits multinational organizations
- Free plan for up to 5 users allows teams to trial the platform with no financial risk
Cons
- Mobile app covers the basics but lacks the fluidity and feature depth of the web experience
- Progress calculation methods offer limited flexibility for teams with non-standard scoring approaches
- Handling large datasets with hundreds of OKRs can introduce noticeable lag
- Display and layout options for OKRs are fairly rigid with minimal room for customization
Pricing
- Free: $0 for up to 5 users with core OKR functionality
- Premium: EUR 8.00 per user per month (10-user minimum)
- Supreme: EUR 10.00 per user per month (10-user minimum) — adds KPI boards, Jira integration, and custom dashboards
Best suited for
Small to mid-market organizations adopting OKRs for the first time who want a clean, no-frills platform with built-in strategy mapping and KPI tracking — particularly teams that need strategic context beyond what Atlassian Goals provides. See also: Perdoo alternatives.
User ratings
G2: 4.4/5 (based on 493+ reviews)
4. Tability
Tability is a lightweight, AI-powered goal-tracking platform that helps teams set, track, and report on OKRs and strategic goals with minimal complexity. It emphasizes outcomes over activities and uses AI to accelerate everything from goal creation to check-in management.
For teams that find Atlassian Goals too basic but do not want the overhead of a heavyweight enterprise platform, Tability fills the middle ground. Its AI-powered goal setting helps teams create well-structured OKRs without deep expertise, and automated check-ins provide the accountability rhythm that Atlassian Goals' passive monthly updates do not deliver. The presentation-ready reports also solve the reporting gap, turning goal updates into shareable summaries with a single click.
Key features
- AI-driven OKR creation: Tability's AI engine walks teams through goal formulation, suggesting improvements and catching vague language so that every objective meets best-practice standards.
- Scheduled standup automation: Daily and weekly standup prompts are sent automatically, collecting progress snapshots from each contributor without requiring live meetings.
- Strategic alignment maps: A visual layer that connects individual goals upward to company-wide priorities, making cross-team dependencies and alignment gaps easy to spot.
- One-click executive reports: Goal data is compiled into presentation-ready summaries instantly, eliminating the manual effort of pulling together updates for leadership reviews.
Pros
- Entry-level plan starts at $4.00 per seat per month, making it one of the most budget-friendly OKR tools available
- AI goal assistance is bundled into the Basic tier rather than locked behind premium pricing
- No minimum seat requirements, so teams can pilot the tool with a handful of users before scaling
- Broad integration support spanning Jira, Slack, Microsoft Teams, GitHub, Asana, and ClickUp
Cons
- Focused exclusively on goal tracking, so teams still rely on separate software for task and project management
- Dashboard customization is more limited than what mature enterprise platforms provide
- The web interface has a learning curve and can feel unintuitive at first
- Review volume on G2 is lower than longer-established competitors, making peer feedback harder to assess
Pricing
- Free: Supports up to 5 seats at no cost
- Basic: $4.00 per seat per month, covering core tracking and AI-assisted goal setting
- Plus: $5.00 per seat per month, adding team-level features and standup automation
- Premium: $8.00 per seat per month, with advanced access controls and around-the-clock support
Best suited for
Small to mid-sized teams (5--200 employees) looking for an affordable, AI-assisted OKR tool that is easy to adopt without heavy onboarding — particularly those that want more structure than Atlassian Goals but less overhead than enterprise platforms. See also: Tability alternatives.
User ratings
G2: 4.7/5 (based on 100+ reviews)
5. Cascade
Cascade is a strategy execution platform consistently ranked as one of the top tools in its category. It helps organizations plan, manage, and track strategic initiatives and objectives through strategy maps, KPI dashboards, and cascading goal frameworks that connect high-level vision to team-level execution.
While Atlassian Goals provides a lightweight tracking layer, Cascade delivers a full strategy execution system with advanced planning tools, structured implementation support, and a cascading goal framework that ensures everyone works toward shared objectives. For organizations that need to translate strategy into execution with real accountability, Cascade provides the depth that Atlassian Goals was never designed to offer.
Key features
- Cascading goal architecture: Align objectives from the C-suite down to individual contributors through a structured hierarchy, ensuring every team's work connects to the broader organizational mission.
- Strategy maps and visual alignment: Interactive maps that illustrate how objectives relate to one another and cascade across business units, giving leaders a bird's-eye view of strategic coherence.
- Real-time KPI dashboards: Live dashboards that consolidate performance data from across the organization, enabling leaders to monitor progress and make data-driven adjustments on the fly.
- Initiative and milestone management: Break strategic objectives into trackable programs, initiatives, and milestones with clear ownership and deadlines.
Pros
- Free plan supports up to 4 users, letting small teams explore strategy execution features without commitment
- Intuitive enough for non-technical users despite the depth of its feature set
- Accountability is baked in through ownership assignments and progress tracking across every level
- Broad integration support spanning Jira, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Tableau, Power BI, and Asana
Cons
- Paid tier pricing requires a conversation with sales, making upfront budgeting difficult
- The pace of product updates and new feature releases has been criticized as slow
- The interface is disorienting during the initial onboarding period
- Generating and customizing reports can involve noticeable load times
Pricing
- Free: Core features for up to 4 users, with unlimited plans and metrics included
- Essentials: Custom pricing (comes with a dedicated customer success manager and strategy workshops)
- Enterprise+: Custom pricing (adds strategy execution advisory services and custom integrations)
Best suited for
Mid-to-large enterprises (200--5,000 employees) that need a dedicated strategy execution platform with structured implementation support and advanced planning capabilities beyond what Atlassian Goals or similar lightweight trackers can provide. See also: Cascade alternatives.
User ratings
G2: 4.7/5 (based on 235+ reviews)
6. Betterworks
Betterworks is an enterprise-grade performance management platform that combines OKR goal setting with continuous feedback, recognition, calibration, and development conversations. It transforms traditional annual reviews into a continuous performance cycle powered by generative AI.
Atlassian Goals tracks objectives in isolation from employee performance. Betterworks connects OKRs to the broader performance management lifecycle — check-ins, multi-source feedback, calibration, and talent reviews all flow through one system. For organizations that want goal tracking to inform compensation and development decisions, Betterworks bridges the gap that Atlassian Goals cannot.
Key features
- Goal and OKR alignment: Cascade company-wide goals into team and individual OKRs with visualization tools and historical tracking of progress over time.
- Continuous feedback and check-ins: Connects OKRs, check-ins, multi-source feedback, and calibration into one workflow so leaders can see how individual contributions roll up to business outcomes.
- AI-powered goal writing: Generative AI helps teams write stronger, more aligned goals and provides intelligent nudges to keep updates consistent and relevant.
- Calibration and talent reviews: Structured calibration workflows help organizations make fair, data-informed decisions about performance and development.
Pros
- Comprehensive performance management that goes beyond OKRs — feedback, recognition, calibration, and development in one platform
- Strong enterprise pedigree with established presence in large-scale deployments
- AI capabilities for goal writing and intelligent performance nudges
- Integrates with Microsoft Teams, Slack, Outlook, and leading HRIS systems
Cons
- No publicly listed pricing, making cost evaluation difficult before engaging with sales
- UI can be non-intuitive with inconsistencies between different views
- Customer support response times can be inconsistent
- Interface looks somewhat dated compared to newer competitors
Pricing
- Custom pricing only (contact required)
Best suited for
Medium to large enterprises (500+ employees) in tech and finance that need a combined performance management and OKR platform with AI-powered continuous feedback cycles — particularly organizations that want goal achievement to inform talent decisions. See also: Betterworks alternatives.
User ratings
G2: 4.4/5 (based on 212+ reviews)
7. 15Five
15Five is a performance management platform designed around the principle that 15 minutes of structured weekly check-ins can transform team effectiveness. It combines OKR tracking with continuous feedback, engagement surveys, manager coaching, and recognition to help managers lead better and employees grow.
Atlassian Goals provides a monthly update cadence with no structured check-in workflow. 15Five takes the opposite approach: OKR progress is embedded into weekly check-in rhythms with high completion rates, and AI-powered coaching helps managers have better conversations about goal progress. For organizations where the main frustration with Atlassian Goals is that nobody actually updates their objectives, 15Five's accountability model is a direct answer.
Key features
- Structured weekly check-ins: Employees spend just 15 minutes answering 5 targeted questions, creating a weekly heartbeat that keeps managers informed and teams accountable.
- Goal alignment views: OKRs cascade from company priorities down to individual contributors, with alignment maps showing how each person's work connects to the bigger picture.
- High Fives recognition: A peer-to-peer recognition system that lets teammates celebrate wins publicly, reinforcing behaviors tied to company values.
- Kona AI coaching assistant: An AI-powered coach that nudges managers with conversation starters, flags disengagement signals, and suggests follow-up actions after check-ins.
Pros
- The weekly check-in habit creates natural OKR accountability without requiring a separate update step
- Peer recognition features help build a positive feedback culture alongside goal tracking
- Onboarding is straightforward, and most teams are up and running within a week
- Manager-specific dashboards surface at-risk employees and stalled objectives early
Cons
- Goal hierarchy and OKR nesting are basic compared to purpose-built OKR platforms
- Advanced features like compensation management and AI coaching cost extra on top of the base plan
- Customization of check-in questions is limited, which can frustrate teams with specific workflows
- Analytics lean toward HR and engagement metrics rather than strategic execution insights
Pricing
- Engage: $4.00 per user per month
- Perform: $11.00 per user per month
- Total Platform: $16.00 per user per month
Best suited for
Mid-market companies (100--2,500 employees) focused on continuous performance management, especially remote and hybrid teams that need structured weekly rhythms to maintain the engagement that Atlassian Goals' passive tracking does not create.
User ratings
G2: 4.6/5 (based on 1,787+ reviews)
8. WorkBoard
WorkBoard is an enterprise strategy execution platform focused on OKR management, AI-powered business reviews, and organizational alignment. In May 2025, WorkBoard acquired Quantive (formerly Gtmhub), consolidating two of the largest enterprise OKR players. The combined platform serves major global enterprises including 3M, Boeing, Cisco, Ford, Renault, UBS, and Unilever.
Atlassian Goals is a free, lightweight goal-tracking feature. WorkBoard operates at the opposite end of the spectrum — it is a heavyweight enterprise platform with AI agents that generate executive briefs, provide real-time coaching, and automate business reviews. For large enterprises that need strategic visibility across thousands of employees and dozens of business units, WorkBoard provides the scale and depth that Atlassian Goals was never designed to reach.
Key features
- AI agents for strategy execution: Built-in AI personas — including a Chief of Staff agent and a Leadership Coach — deliver real-time nudges, surface blind spots, and keep strategic priorities front and center across every level of the organization.
- Automated executive briefs: AI compiles team-level progress, wins, blockers, and risks into digestible summaries, eliminating the need for manual status update meetings.
- Plan-vs-actual scorecards: Leading and lagging indicators are tracked side by side with heatmap visualizations that provide instant organizational health checks.
- In-meeting OKR integration: Goals are surfaced directly within meeting agendas, embedding strategic context into the natural rhythm of team conversations.
Pros
- Unmatched enterprise pedigree, with a Fortune 500 client roster that includes some of the world's largest companies
- AI agents go beyond dashboards — they actively coach leaders and flag risks before they escalate
- The Quantive acquisition brings 150+ data source integrations to the platform
- Workstreams feature effectively bridges the gap between strategic planning and day-to-day execution
Cons
- Enterprise-tier pricing puts it out of reach for small and mid-sized organizations
- The interface can be slow and unintuitive to navigate
- Onboarding demands a significant time and resource commitment before teams see value
- Feature depth creates a steep learning curve, especially for first-time OKR adopters
Pricing
- Custom enterprise pricing only — no self-serve plans or public price lists are available; a sales conversation is required to receive a quote
Best suited for
Large enterprises (1,000+ employees) with dedicated strategy teams that need AI-powered OKR alignment, automated business reviews, and executive-level visibility — organizations that have long outgrown what Atlassian Goals can offer. See also: WorkBoard alternatives.
User ratings
G2: 4.5/5 (based on 102+ reviews)
9. Weekdone
Weekdone is a weekly planning and OKR software that has been on the market since 2013, positioning itself as one of the easiest-to-use OKR tools available. It combines quarterly OKR management with weekly status reporting, emphasizing simplicity and regular check-in rhythms to keep teams aligned.
Atlassian Goals does not offer coaching or structured weekly planning workflows. Weekdone includes OKR coaching in all paid plans — personalized 1:1 and team coaching sessions with experienced OKR coaches. For small teams that are new to OKRs and need both a tool and guided methodology support, Weekdone provides the hand-holding that Atlassian Goals does not.
Key features
- Included OKR coaching: Every paid subscription comes with personalized 1:1 and team coaching sessions led by experienced OKR practitioners — a rarity at this price point.
- OKR alignment tree: A visual hierarchy that maps how objectives cascade from the company level down through departments, teams, and individuals, making alignment transparent at a glance.
- Automated weekly status reports: Leaders receive auto-generated weekly digests summarizing progress across all teams, eliminating the need for manual status collection.
- Employee engagement tools: Built-in pulse surveys, peer kudos, and feedback mechanisms let managers track team sentiment alongside goal outcomes.
Pros
- OKR coaching bundled into every paid plan removes the need to hire external consultants for methodology adoption
- One of the longest-standing OKR platforms (since 2013), offering a battle-tested approach to goal management
- Visual alignment tree makes it immediately clear how individual work connects to company-level objectives
- Free plan for up to 3 users lets small teams trial the full feature set before committing
Cons
- The G2 profile has gone unmanaged for over a year, which raises questions about ongoing product investment
- Noticeable performance lag occurs when loading dashboards that contain many OKRs
- Feature depth is limited for larger organizations that need advanced workflows or custom reporting
- Tiered pricing by team size (rather than per-user) can create awkward cost jumps as headcount grows
Pricing
- Free: Up to 3 users (full feature access)
- Paid: Roughly $9.00--$10.00 per user per month for teams of 10--50 users, with OKR coaching included at no additional charge
Best suited for
Small teams and startups (3-50 employees) that need lightweight weekly goal tracking with built-in OKR coaching, particularly teams new to the framework that want an affordable, guided entry point. See also: Weekdone alternatives.
User ratings
G2: 4.5/5
10. Inspire Software
Inspire Software is a unified strategy execution and performance platform that combines OKRs, strategic planning, performance management, employee engagement, recognition, and leadership development in one system. It differentiates with built-in leadership content from Ken Blanchard, FranklinCovey, and DISC.
Atlassian Goals is a pure goal-tracking tool with no development or coaching resources. Inspire Software pairs OKR management with curated leadership content, so managers do not just set goals — they develop the skills to lead teams toward achieving them. For organizations that view goal management as part of a broader leadership development initiative, Inspire offers a unique combination that Atlassian Goals cannot match.
Key features
- OKR and goal management: AI-assisted goal creation and alignment with vertical and horizontal goal visibility across the organization.
- Real-time performance dashboards: Track progress and surface risks early with dashboards that provide leadership visibility into execution health.
- Built-in leadership content: Integrated content from Ken Blanchard, FranklinCovey, and DISC provides development resources alongside goal management.
- Recognition and engagement: Employee recognition, feedback, and engagement tools embedded into daily workflows to drive buy-in and accountability.
Pros
- The pairing of OKR management with leadership development content from recognized authorities is unique in the market
- At $10.00 per user per month, pricing is competitive and offers even better rates for smaller teams
- OKRs are laid out in a clear, easy-to-read format with intuitive navigation between goals and progress views
- The customer support team is described as responsive and genuinely invested in customer outcomes
Cons
- A smaller market footprint means fewer peer reviews, community resources, and public case studies are available
- Organizations that only need goal tracking without development features may not fully utilize the platform
- Pure OKR management depth is less than what dedicated, focused OKR tools deliver
- Information about enterprise-scale deployments and large-organization use cases is limited
Pricing
- Starting at: $10.00 per user per month
- Free demo and trial available
Best suited for
Mid-sized organizations (100--1,000 employees) that want OKR management combined with leadership development and performance management in a single, competitively priced platform — especially those investing in manager effectiveness alongside goal tracking.
User ratings
G2: 4.7/5 (based on 112+ reviews)
11. Teamflect
Teamflect is a people management platform purpose-built for Microsoft 365 that handles OKR tracking, performance reviews, 360-degree feedback, engagement surveys, 1:1 meetings, and recognition entirely within Microsoft Teams and Outlook. It is the top-rated OKR tool for organizations deeply invested in the Microsoft ecosystem.
Atlassian Goals serves the Atlassian ecosystem; Teamflect serves the Microsoft ecosystem. For organizations that run on Microsoft 365 and want goal management embedded directly in Teams and Outlook without adopting a separate platform, Teamflect is the natural counterpart. The structured approval flows and Power BI reporting also add governance depth that Atlassian Goals does not offer.
Key features
- OKR management in Microsoft Teams: Set, track, and cascade OKRs directly within Microsoft Teams and Outlook, with goal completion criteria including currency, percentage, sub-goal completion, and task completion.
- Goal cascading and alignment: Create clear lines of sight from individual contributions to company objectives, with goals that can be related, tracked inside meetings, and cascaded across organizational levels.
- Power BI reporting: Detailed Power BI reports on OKR data provide insights on goal completion rates and goal-setting practices.
- Goal approval flows: Structured approval workflows let managers and supervisors review and approve goals before they are finalized.
Pros
- Everything runs inside Microsoft Teams and Outlook, meaning no new tool to learn, no separate logins, and maximum adoption rates
- A generous free tier provides full functionality for up to 10 users with no time limits
- Implementation is fast and straightforward, with no complex IT requirements or lengthy onboarding needed
- Every customer receives a dedicated success manager to support rollout and training
Cons
- The platform is entirely dependent on Microsoft 365, making it unsuitable for organizations on other ecosystems
- Template flexibility and out-of-the-box reporting are more limited than what standalone OKR tools offer
- Customization options are constrained compared to dedicated, platform-agnostic OKR solutions
- The feature set is primarily designed for smaller organizations and may lack the depth required for complex enterprise OKR programs
Pricing
- Free: Up to 10 users (full functionality, no time limits)
- Essential: $5.00 per user per month
- Professional: $11.00 per user per month
Best suited for
Small to mid-sized organizations (10--500 employees) deeply embedded in Microsoft 365 that want OKR management without adopting a separate tool — the Microsoft-ecosystem equivalent of what Atlassian Goals provides for Atlassian users, but with deeper OKR features. See also: Teamflect alternatives.
User ratings
G2: 4.6/5 (based on 103+ reviews)
12. Oboard
Oboard (OKR Board) is the most installed OKR plugin on the Atlassian Marketplace, allowing organizations to manage OKRs and KPIs directly within Jira and Confluence. It also offers integrations with Salesforce and monday.com, and a standalone web platform for organizations with mixed tooling environments.
For organizations that want to stay in Jira but need deeper OKR-specific functionality than Atlassian Goals provides, Oboard is the closest fit. It offers weighted key results, custom OKR levels, and automatic progress tracking from Jira issues — capabilities that Atlassian Goals does not have. With 3,200+ Marketplace installs and pricing as low as $0.09 per user per month, Oboard adds real OKR depth to Jira without the cost or complexity of Jira Align.
Key features
- Deep Jira integration: Use Jira Epics or Stories as Key Results with automatic status tracking that updates OKR grades based on issue status changes.
- Custom OKR levels and weights: Create custom organizational levels (Company, Group, Team, Personal) with weighted key results based on business impact.
- KPI reporting dashboard: Dedicated KPI dashboards ensure health metrics stay in focus alongside OKR tracking, with check-in reminders for structured progress updates.
- Cross-platform support: Available for Jira Cloud, Jira Server, and Jira Data Center, with additional apps for monday.com and Salesforce.
Pros
- The most budget-friendly OKR solution for Jira users, with a generous free tier and per-user costs as low as $0.09 per month
- Connects OKRs directly to Jira epics, stories, and project work without requiring any context switching
- Lightweight and intuitive enough to be set up and operational within a single day
- Trusted Gold Marketplace Partner with over 3,200 installs and strong standing in the Atlassian community
Cons
- Extended usage sessions have been reported to cause performance slowdowns in larger workspaces
- Progress tracking from linked Jira tickets operates on a binary basis (0% or 100%) with no support for partial completion
- Pre-built reporting for leadership-level visibility is limited, requiring manual workarounds
- There is no dedicated mobile app, and the platform currently supports only 7 languages
Pricing
- Free: Up to 10 users in Jira
- Paid: $0.09--$1.50 per user per month (scales with team size)
- 30-day trial available
Best suited for
Teams already working within Jira who want a lightweight, affordable way to add deeper OKR tracking than Atlassian Goals provides — without the complexity or cost of Jira Align. See also: Oboard alternatives.
User ratings
G2: 4.7/5 (based on 13+ reviews)
How to choose the best Atlassian Goals alternative for your team?
Atlassian Goals covers a broad spectrum of organizations — from small teams using the free tier to enterprises that need more depth. The right alternative depends on where your organization falls and what specific gap you are trying to close.
1. Determine whether you need a standalone platform or an ecosystem plugin
If your organization runs entirely on Atlassian tools and you want to stay within Jira, Oboard provides deeper OKR functionality as a Marketplace plugin. If your teams use mixed tooling environments — Jira alongside Slack, Microsoft Teams, Asana, or others — a standalone platform like Mooncamp or Profit.co ensures every team can participate in goal tracking regardless of which project management tool they use.
2. Assess the maturity of your OKR program
Teams just getting started with OKRs have different needs than organizations running mature programs. If you are new to OKRs, look for included coaching (Weekdone) or AI-assisted goal setting (Tability, Profit.co). If your OKR program is established and you need weighted key results, cascading alignment, and advanced reporting, prioritize platforms like Mooncamp or Cascade that offer strategic depth.
3. Decide if you need OKRs alone or OKRs within a broader HR platform
Some organizations want a dedicated strategy execution tool. Others want goal tracking embedded in performance reviews, engagement surveys, and compensation management. 15Five and Betterworks bundle OKRs into broader people management platforms. Mooncamp, Profit.co, and Cascade focus on strategy execution specifically. Pick the category that matches your primary use case.
4. Evaluate reporting requirements against your leadership cadence
If your leadership team runs quarterly business reviews, you need dashboards and reports that are presentation-ready without manual compilation. Test whether the platform can generate the specific views your executives actually use. Atlassian Goals' reporting gap is one of the top reasons teams switch — make sure your alternative actually solves it.
5. Calculate total cost including the tools you already pay for
Atlassian Goals is free for Atlassian Cloud customers, so any alternative adds cost. Factor in per-user pricing across your entire organization, not just the pilot group. Also consider whether the alternative eliminates other tool subscriptions — a platform that replaces both your goal tracker and your reporting tool may cost less total than adding a cheap OKR plugin alongside existing tools.
6. Test with real goals and real teams during the trial period
Every platform on this list offers a free plan or trial. Import your actual objectives, invite the team leads who will own the process, and run a genuine check-in cycle. Pay attention to adoption friction: do people update their goals without being reminded, or does the tool sit idle? The platform with the highest organic engagement wins.
7. Verify that the Jira integration works the way you need it to
If you are leaving Atlassian Goals but staying in Jira, check how each alternative connects to your Jira workflow. Some offer lightweight linking; others provide deep bidirectional sync with automatic progress updates. Map your specific requirements — do you need Jira epics as key results, automatic status updates, or just a simple link? The depth of integration varies significantly across tools.
Conclusion
Atlassian Goals fills a clear niche: free, basic goal tracking for teams already living inside Jira and Confluence. But as organizations grow their OKR practice beyond simple objective visibility, the platform's shallow reporting, weak accountability mechanisms, and ecosystem lock-in become real constraints. The right alternative depends on whether you need deeper OKR management, broader integrations, structured check-in workflows, or a full strategy execution system.
Start by identifying the specific gap that prompted your search. If it is reporting, test dashboards during trials with your real QBR format. If it is engagement, run a check-in cycle and measure completion rates. If it is ecosystem lock-in, verify that every team — not just the Jira users — can participate. The most successful tool transitions start with a clear problem statement, not a feature comparison.
If you are looking for a platform that combines deep customization, advanced real-time reporting, and structured check-ins with the flexibility to work across any tech stack, Mooncamp is built for exactly this. With expert implementation support from a team that has guided hundreds of OKR rollouts and integrations that span Jira, Microsoft Teams, Slack, and Power BI, it addresses the core limitations that drive teams beyond Atlassian Goals. Start a free trial or book a demo with our team.
Frequently asked questions
What is the best Atlassian Goals alternative?
Mooncamp is the top choice for organizations that need advanced reporting, structured check-ins, and cross-ecosystem flexibility beyond Atlassian. Profit.co is a strong option for teams wanting a full OKR lifecycle with built-in task management, and Perdoo suits organizations that want clean OKR and KPI tracking at a lower price point.
Is there a free Atlassian Goals alternative?
Yes. Profit.co offers a free plan for up to 5 users, Tability is free for up to 5 seats, Cascade is free for up to 4 users, Weekdone is free for up to 3 users, and Oboard is free for up to 10 users within Jira. Teamflect is free for up to 10 users in Microsoft Teams.
Why switch from Atlassian Goals?
The most common reasons are shallow reporting with no custom dashboards or analytics, lightweight goal management that lacks strategic depth (no weighted key results, cascading alignment, or scoring), weak accountability with only monthly updates, and ecosystem lock-in that excludes non-Atlassian teams from participating.
Can I migrate my data from Atlassian Goals?
Most alternatives support data import through CSV exports or API connections. Many vendors, including Mooncamp, provide migration guidance as part of onboarding. Since Atlassian Goals is relatively lightweight, migration is typically straightforward compared to moving from more complex platforms.
Atlassian Goals vs Mooncamp: Which is better?
Mooncamp provides significantly deeper OKR management with advanced dashboards, structured check-ins, visual alignment maps, and cross-ecosystem integrations that Atlassian Goals does not offer. While Atlassian Goals is free, Mooncamp starts at $7.00 per user per month and delivers the reporting depth, customization, and expert support that growing OKR programs require.
Does switching from Atlassian Goals mean leaving the Atlassian ecosystem?
No. Most alternatives on this list integrate with Jira, and some like Oboard are built specifically for the Atlassian Marketplace. Mooncamp, Profit.co, Cascade, and others offer native Jira integrations that maintain the connection between goals and project work. You can move your goal management to a more capable platform while keeping Jira as your project management backbone.




