All posts

Perdoo vs. Workpath (vs. Mooncamp) in 2026

TL;DR
  • Perdoo wins 4 out of 7 categories, with one draw. Workpath holds the edge in enterprise-grade goal management and reporting analytics.
  • Outgrowing Perdoo or Workpath? Mooncamp gives mid-market and enterprise organizations the configurable goal architecture, real-time custom dashboards, and intuitive design they need to scale strategy execution without compromise.

Both Perdoo and Workpath are headquartered in Germany and built for organizations that take OKR management seriously.

They approach the problem from opposite ends of the complexity spectrum: one keeps things approachable, the other goes deep on enterprise analytics and AI.

Choosing between them often comes down to organizational size and how much configuration your leadership team is willing to invest upfront.

I tested both platforms to see how they compare across pricing, UI, goal management, reporting, extra features, integrations, and support, plus a bonus pick for teams that want the best of both worlds.

What's new in Perdoo?

Perdoo shipped an Explore update in February 2026 that introduces public and private views. Superadmins can now publish views accessible to the entire organization, while individual contributors can save personal filtered views for quick reference.

The same update added multi-format export from Explore, letting teams pull goals into CSV, PDF, or PowerPoint directly for meeting preparation. A new Monday.com integration and enhanced OKR cloning (batch-clone aligned goals with retained progress and integrations) round out the release.

What's new in Workpath?

Workpath launched its AI Agent Hub in 2025, introducing four specialized AI agents: Strategy Consultant, Chief of Staff, Market Analyst, and PMO Lead. These agents draft OKRs using organizational context, run automated quality checks on goal statements, detect KPI risks in real-time, and produce performance insights without manual prompt engineering.

The company also rolled out a Viva Goals Migration Program after Microsoft sunset Viva Goals in 2025. The program offers free migration assistance for enterprises transitioning to Workpath, positioning the platform as the primary European alternative for large-scale strategy execution.

Perdoo vs Workpath — in a nutshell

Perdoo bundles OKRs, KPIs, check-ins, performance reviews, and 1:1 meetings in a single workspace with a free entry tier. Workpath treats strategy execution as a modular system where goals, KPIs, initiatives, and resources are separate but interconnected, enhanced by AI agents that actively improve goal quality.

In practice, Perdoo is faster to deploy and more self-service oriented. Workpath requires deeper configuration but rewards large enterprises with analytics and automation capabilities that Perdoo cannot match.

Here is how both tools stack up side by side (with Mooncamp included as a third reference point).

Perdoo

Workpath

Mooncamp

Pricing

- Free plan
- From $8/user/mo (annual)

- No free plan
- On request

- From $7.00/user/mo (annual)
- Enterprise: on request

User interface

Structured, strategy-map-centered layout with limited mobile app

Enterprise-oriented workspace with AI Companion panel, no mobile app

Modern and minimalist, award-winning UX designed to drive adoption

OKR/Goal management

OKRs and KPIs with visual strategy cascade, weighted KRs, custom fields

Impact chains linking inputs to business outcomes, AI-powered goal coaching, multi-framework support

Strong for OKRs and KPIs, completely customizable to match any strategy framework

Reporting

Custom dashboards, KPI Boards, CSV/PDF/PPT export

Cycle Steering analytics, automated business review prep, variance analysis

Advanced reporting features with fully customizable dashboards and charts

Additional features

1:1 meetings, performance reviews, pulse surveys, Kudos

Business Review module, AI Agent Hub, Workpath Academy, async Conversations

Automated check-ins, strategy maps, customizable goal types and fields

Integrations

20+ native (Jira, Asana, Salesforce, Power BI, Monday.com), Zapier, GraphQL API

MS Teams, Jira, Azure DevOps, Power BI, Workday, SAP SuccessFactors, Personio

Data integrations (Jira, Power BI, MS Planner), Slack, and the most advanced MS Teams integration on the market

Support

Live chat, email, Support Center, optional OKR coaching

Dedicated onboarding managers, CSMs, Academy with workshops, consulting services

Certified OKR and strategy experts, hundreds of successful rollouts worldwide

G2 rating

4.4/5 (519 reviews)

4.9/5 (12 reviews)

4.8/5 (296 reviews)

Related articles

Perdoo offers a free tier and transparent pricing; Workpath charges by module

Perdoo publishes three plans denominated in EUR. The Free plan supports up to 5 users and includes the core OKR and KPI engine, Strategy Map, check-ins, 1:1s, reviews, and basic integrations. It is one of the most generous free tiers in the OKR software market.

Paid plans require a minimum of 10 licenses. Premium costs $8 per user per month and adds performance dashboards, engagement analytics, SSO/SCIM, and data export. Supreme at $10 per user per month unlocks KPI Boards, private goals, custom fields, custom reports, Jira and Asana integrations, and view-only licenses at $1.50 per user per month.

Annual billing saves 10% compared to quarterly. There are no implementation fees, and volume discounts are available for larger organizations.

Perdoo subscription plans

Plan

Price

Key additions

Free

$0 per user per month

Up to 5 users, core OKR/KPI features, Strategy Map, check-ins, 1:1s, reviews

Premium

$8 per user per month*

Min. 10 licenses. Performance dashboards, SSO/SCIM, engagement analytics

Supreme

$10 per user per month*

Min. 10 licenses. KPI Boards, custom fields, custom reports, Jira/Asana, view-only seats

*Billed annually.

Workpath uses a modular pricing model based on how many capability modules you activate. The three tiers are 1 Module, 2 Modules, and 3+ Modules, covering areas like Goals, KPIs, Initiatives, and Resources. Viewer licenses are free on every tier, while Standard User and Analyst licenses are priced per seat.

Workpath does not publish specific per-user prices on its website. Organizations need to book a pricing consultation to receive a quote. The final price depends on the number of modules, license types, and organization size.

Workpath subscription plans

Plan

Price

Key additions

1 Module

On request

Single capability module, Workpath AI, Agent Hub, free viewer licenses

2 Modules

On request

Two capability modules, expanded analytics

3+ Modules

On request

Full platform access, dedicated support

Perdoo is the more accessible option. Its free plan removes evaluation friction entirely, and pricing is fully transparent on its website. Workpath does not publish any per-user prices, requiring a sales consultation before organizations can even compare costs.

Verdict

Perdoo takes pricing. A genuine free tier, public pricing, and no contract lock-in make it the lower-risk entry point for most organizations.

Perdoo's structured navigation edges out Workpath's desktop-only experience

Perdoo organizes everything around its Strategy Map and Cascade views. Navigation flows from the company-level strategy down through strategic pillars into team and individual OKRs. The Explore feature introduced in 2026 adds a unified canvas where users can browse, filter, and save custom views of their goal landscape.

The interface is polished and professional, though it can feel dense when organizations have hundreds of active goals. I found the Strategy Map especially useful for quick executive alignment checks, but navigating deep goal hierarchies sometimes required more clicks than expected.

Perdoo does offer a mobile app, though it trails the desktop experience in feature coverage and polish.

Workpath presents a left-sidebar workspace with sections for Teams, Workspaces, and Explore (containing the Goal Graph and Goal Explorer). The layout is clean and spacious, designed for long working sessions in a browser rather than quick mobile check-ins.

The AI Companion panel embedded in the interface provides contextual guidance, such as suggesting next steps or flagging incomplete goal definitions. This makes the platform feel like it is actively helping rather than passively displaying data.

There is no mobile app at all. For organizations where managers update goals on the go, this is a meaningful gap.

Verdict

Perdoo edges ahead on interface accessibility. Its spatial navigation and mobile app (limited as it is) serve a broader range of users than Workpath's desktop-only, browser-first approach.

Workpath's impact chains outclass Perdoo's goal hierarchy for enterprise complexity

Perdoo delivers a well-rounded goal management system built around OKRs and KPIs. Goals cascade from the Strategy Map through strategic pillars into team and individual objectives. Key Results support weighting, so teams can signal which outcomes matter most. Custom fields let organizations attach metadata like budget allocations, risk flags, or project codes to any goal.

The February 2026 cloning update is a practical time-saver. Teams can now batch-clone aligned OKRs into new cycles while retaining progress data and integration connections, which eliminates one of the most tedious parts of quarterly rollover.

My experience was that Perdoo handles straightforward goal hierarchies well, but starts to feel constrained when organizations need to model cross-functional dependencies or track goals through frameworks beyond OKRs and KPIs.

Workpath approaches goal management as outcome management. Its impact chains map the causal path from inputs through outputs to outcomes and business impact, creating a logic model that goes well beyond traditional OKR cascading. Goals, KPIs, Initiatives, and Resources are managed as separate interconnected modules, each with its own workflow.

The AI agents actively improve goal quality by drafting OKR statements with organizational context, flagging alignment gaps between teams, and detecting when KPIs are trending off track. The contribution request system lets teams formally request and track cross-functional commitments.

Workpath also supports Balanced Scorecards and SAFe/PI planning alongside OKRs. For large enterprises running multiple strategy frameworks simultaneously, this multi-framework flexibility is hard to find elsewhere.

Verdict

Workpath takes goal management for enterprises that need impact modeling, AI-assisted goal quality, and multi-framework support. Perdoo remains the better choice for organizations that want a focused, efficient OKR and KPI setup without modular complexity.

Workpath's analytics engine outpaces Perdoo's accessible dashboards

Perdoo provides pre-built performance dashboards, engagement dashboards, and the new Explore views with public and private visibility. KPI Boards display month-over-month trends with sparklines, giving leadership a quick pulse on operational metrics. The February 2026 update added CSV, PDF, and PowerPoint export directly from Explore, which makes it straightforward to pull goal data into presentations.

The Health Report tracks strategy adoption across the organization, surfacing participation rates and update frequency. For teams that need clean, exportable dashboards without extensive setup, Perdoo covers the essentials.

Reporting becomes limiting when organizations want to build multi-dimensional views or automate periodic business reviews. I noticed that customizing dashboard layouts beyond the available templates was not always possible.

Workpath's analytics suite is purpose-built for enterprise leadership reporting. The Cycle Steering dashboard breaks strategy execution into three tabs: Planning, Execution, and Adoption & Engagement. Real-time dashboards pull KPI data automatically from connected sources like Power BI, reducing the manual consolidation that drains leadership teams during review cycles.

Automated business review preparation, variance analysis, and AI-generated performance summaries turn raw goal data into executive-ready narratives. Impact chain analytics trace execution quality from the earliest inputs through to measurable business outcomes.

The trade-off is complexity. The analytics suite requires configuration time, and some views can be slow to render accurate data in large deployments.

Verdict

Workpath leads on reporting depth, automation, and executive-ready analytics. Perdoo leads on setup speed and day-to-day accessibility for teams that need clear reports without a steep configuration investment.

Both offer extras beyond OKRs, but in completely different directions

Perdoo extends into people management territory. Built-in 1:1 meetings include collaborative agendas, action items, and Google Calendar sync. Performance reviews offer customizable question sets with star ratings. Pulse surveys are embedded directly into the check-in flow, collecting engagement data on a 1-to-5 scale. Kudos provides a lightweight public recognition layer.

This breadth means smaller organizations can consolidate their OKR tool and their performance management tool into a single subscription. For teams already running a dedicated HR platform, though, these features may go unused.

I appreciated how tightly the 1:1 and review features are wired into the goal context, making it easy to reference specific OKRs during performance conversations.

Workpath's additional features are oriented toward enterprise strategy operations. The Business Review module structures quarterly planning sessions with data-driven agendas. The AI Agent Hub goes beyond goal coaching, enabling custom AI workflows for strategy tasks like competitive analysis and portfolio prioritization. Conversations support async collaboration around specific goals.

The Workpath Academy provides trainer-led workshops, masterclasses, and self-paced courses on OKR methodology and strategy execution. This is a meaningful differentiator for enterprises that need to train hundreds of managers on a consistent framework.

Workpath does not offer 1:1 meeting tools, performance reviews, or employee recognition features.

Verdict

It depends on organizational needs. Perdoo wins for teams that want people management built into their goal platform. Workpath wins for enterprises that need structured business review workflows and AI-driven strategy automation.

Perdoo connects to more apps out of the box; Workpath goes deeper on HRIS

Perdoo lists over 20 native integrations spanning project management (Jira, Asana, Monday.com), BI and data (Power BI, Google Analytics), CRM (Salesforce, HubSpot), messaging (Slack, MS Teams), and HRIS (BambooHR, Factorial). The GraphQL API enables custom integrations, and Zapier connectivity opens the door to 5,000+ additional apps.

Integration availability scales with the plan. Jira, Asana, and Power BI are reserved for the Supreme tier, which means teams on Premium need to rely on Zapier or the API for those connections.

I found the Jira integration particularly well-implemented, automatically syncing progress from issues to Key Results without manual updates.

Workpath focuses its integration strategy on enterprise systems. Native connectors cover MS Teams, Jira, Azure DevOps, Power BI, Excel Online, and Microsoft Planner. The HRIS layer is where Workpath differentiates, with direct integrations to Workday, SAP SuccessFactors, and Personio for automatic org-structure syncing.

SSO is supported through Active Directory, Okta, and OneLogin. The MCP (Model Context Protocol) enables agent-to-agent connections, extending Workpath's AI capabilities to external tools like Slack, Salesforce, and Confluence.

The integration list is shorter than Perdoo's, and there is no Zapier equivalent for quick plug-and-play connections with smaller SaaS tools.

Verdict

Perdoo offers broader integration coverage with more native connectors and Zapier as a catch-all. Workpath offers deeper enterprise system integration through Workday, SAP SuccessFactors, and Personio connectors that Perdoo does not have.

Perdoo responds faster; Workpath invests in strategic enablement

Perdoo provides in-app live chat, email support, and a comprehensive Support Center with articles and quick-start guides. Multi-lingual chat support is available on paid plans. Larger accounts get a dedicated Customer Success Manager, and expert OKR coaching is available as an add-on.

Response times on live chat are typically fast, often under 20 minutes during business hours. A free online OKR course supplements the self-service documentation.

I found the live chat responsive and knowledgeable, able to answer product questions and OKR methodology questions in the same conversation.

Workpath takes a consultative approach to support. Dedicated onboarding managers guide initial deployment. Customer Success Managers provide ongoing strategic advisory. Change-management workshops help organizations navigate the cultural shift that OKR adoption requires.

The Workpath Academy is a standout asset, offering structured learning paths from self-paced modules to trainer-led masterclasses and train-the-trainer programs. For enterprises rolling out OKRs to hundreds of managers across geographies, this depth of enablement is valuable.

A partner ecosystem provides additional third-party consulting support for organizations that need specialized implementation help.

Verdict

A draw, each excelling in a different dimension. Perdoo delivers fast, accessible reactive support. Workpath delivers deep, structured strategic enablement through its Academy and consulting services.

Final call: Perdoo vs Workpath

Perdoo is the stronger all-around platform in this comparison, winning 4 of 7 categories. It takes pricing, user interface, integrations, and additional features, while drawing on support.

Workpath earns its wins in the two categories that matter most to large enterprises: goal management depth and reporting analytics. Its impact chains, AI agents, and automated business reviews are capabilities Perdoo simply does not offer.

For mid-market organizations (50 to 500 employees) that want a single platform covering OKRs, KPIs, and people management, Perdoo is the clear pick. For enterprises (500+) with complex matrix structures and a need for AI-powered outcome management, Workpath justifies its higher investment.

Both tools are built by strong German companies with deep OKR expertise. The decision ultimately hinges on whether your organization needs breadth and simplicity (Perdoo) or depth and enterprise analytics (Workpath).

What if you need more?

Even as the category winner, Perdoo has ceilings that growing organizations eventually hit. Getting teams across multiple departments to adopt the platform consistently requires more onboarding investment than the clean interface suggests. Goal structures are built around a standard OKR-and-KPI model that does not flex for organizations running hybrid methodologies, SMART goals, or custom taxonomies alongside OKRs. Reporting covers common scenarios well, but producing tailored executive dashboards for different leadership audiences means working within template boundaries rather than building from scratch. For organizations that need more room to grow, Mooncamp is worth a look.

Outgrowing Perdoo or Workpath? Try Mooncamp

Perdoo caps customization at predefined goal structures and templated reports. Workpath provides enterprise depth but demands significant configuration time and has no mobile experience at all. Mooncamp occupies the space between them: an OKR and strategy execution platform that gives organizations full control over goal types, workflows, and reporting without requiring weeks of setup or a dedicated admin team.

Built for scale-ups and enterprises, Mooncamp adapts to how each team actually operates rather than prescribing a single methodology. The result is faster adoption across departments, richer strategic visibility for leadership, and reporting that serves every audience from weekly standups to board presentations.

  • Rapid organization-wide adoption: A modern, minimalist interface that every team member navigates confidently from their first session, avoiding the extended ramp-up that both Perdoo's spatial views and Workpath's modular architecture require.
  • Goal frameworks that bend to your process: Create custom goal types, statuses, fields, and cadences that reflect your actual strategy methodology, whether that is pure OKRs, a hybrid with SMART goals, or something unique to your organization.
  • Dashboards built for any stakeholder: Assemble fully customizable real-time dashboards and charts that deliver the right level of detail to each audience, from operational team leads to C-suite executives, without fixed templates or external BI tools.
  • Integrated data connectors that keep goals current: Native integrations with Jira, Power BI, MS Planner, and Slack, alongside the most advanced Microsoft Teams integration on the market, ensure goal progress stays synchronized with the tools teams already rely on.

Try Mooncamp for free

Related Articles

Try Mooncamp for free