- Tability wins 4 out of 7 categories, earning the overall recommendation for teams that want focused OKR tracking with built-in analytics. Teamflect takes pricing, additional features, and support thanks to its generous free plan and comprehensive people management suite.
- Outgrowing Tability or Teamflect? Mooncamp gives growing organizations fully configurable goal frameworks, real-time executive dashboards, and an interface designed to scale adoption across departments without platform lock-in.
Goal tracking and performance management often live in separate tools, forcing managers to reconcile progress across disconnected systems.
Tability and Teamflect both promise to solve that fragmentation, but they come at it from opposite directions.
Tability is a standalone goal tracker built by ex-Atlassians who wanted weekly OKR updates to feel as lightweight as a Slack message.
Teamflect embeds goals, reviews, feedback, and recognition directly inside Microsoft Teams so employees never open a second app.
I tested both tools side by side to see which approach delivers better results in practice, plus a bonus pick for teams that outgrow either option.
What's new in Tability?
Tability shipped AI-powered retrospectives in spring 2025, which automatically condense weekly check-ins into quarterly summaries with clear next steps. The feature turns months of incremental updates into an actionable narrative without manual effort.
Updated pricing went live in January 2026, introducing a Basic tier at $6.00 per user per month and a Premium tier at $10.00 per user per month on annual billing. Existing customers keep their current rates until July 2026.
What's new in Teamflect?
Teamflect introduced Preset Goal Templates that let administrators define reusable objectives with predefined titles and measurement logic. Locked fields prevent teams from drifting away from organizational standards.
An AI Assistant button now surfaces directly inside the app, answering questions based on verified internal content. HRIS sync also expanded to pull in birthday, gender, and ethnicity attributes alongside existing employee data.
Tability vs Teamflect — in a nutshell
Tability is a purpose-built goal tracker that uses AI coaching, quality scores, and automated reminders to turn OKRs into a weekly rhythm. Teamflect wraps goal tracking inside a broader performance management platform that lives entirely within Microsoft Teams.
The practical divide comes down to scope and ecosystem. Tability gives you a dedicated workspace for goals that connects to any tech stack, while Teamflect bundles goals with reviews, feedback, and recognition but requires Microsoft 365 as the foundation.
Here is how they compare across the key categories (with Mooncamp included as a third reference point).
Tability | Teamflect | Mooncamp | |
|---|---|---|---|
Pricing | - Free plan (5 users) | - Free plan (10 users) | - From $7/user/mo (annual) |
User interface | Clean standalone web app, minimalist sidebar navigation | Fully embedded inside Microsoft Teams, no standalone option | Modern and minimalist, award-winning UX designed to drive adoption |
OKR/Goal management | AI goal writing, OKR quality score, strategy map, initiatives | Cascading goals, goal templates, tree and list views | Strong for OKRs and KPIs, completely customizable to match any strategy framework |
Reporting | Custom dashboards, AI retrospectives, Net Confidence Score | Preset analytics, Power BI connector for custom reports | Advanced reporting features with fully customizable dashboards and charts |
Additional features | Kanban boards, standups, AI coaching | Performance reviews, 360 feedback, surveys, recognition, talent grid, career pathing | Automated check-ins, strategy maps, customizable goal types and fields |
Integrations | Slack, Jira, Asana, Linear, Notion, Google Sheets, Zapier | Microsoft Teams, Outlook, Planner, Entra ID, Power BI, 200+ HRIS platforms | Data integrations (Jira, Power BI, MS Planner), Slack, and the most advanced MS Teams integration on the market |
Support | Business-hours support on Basic, 24/7 on Premium, CSM on Enterprise | Dedicated CSM and free implementation on all paid plans | Certified OKR and strategy experts, hundreds of successful rollouts worldwide |
G2 rating | 4.6/5 (161 reviews) | 4.6/5 (250+ reviews) | 4.8/5 (296 reviews) |
Explore more head-to-head breakdowns and alternative roundups for both tools:
Teamflect's free tier is hard to beat on entry-level value
Tability offers a free plan for up to 5 users that covers essential goal tracking. It is a trimmed-down experience, but enough to test the OKR workflow before committing budget.
Tability subscription plans
Plan | Price | Notes |
|---|---|---|
Free | $0.00 per user per month | Up to 5 users, essential goal tracking |
Basic | $6.00 per user per month* | AI goal setting, check-ins, strategy map, Slack integration |
Premium | $10.00 per user per month* | Custom dashboards, automated check-ins, SAML SSO, all integrations, free read-only seats |
Enterprise | Custom pricing | 100+ users, regional hosting, dedicated CSM |
*billed annually
Teamflect's Starter plan doubles Tability's free headcount to 10 users and includes every core feature, from OKR tracking to performance reviews and recognition. There is no time limit and no feature gating on the free tier.
I found the Starter plan surprisingly complete. Most competitors reserve reviews or feedback modules for paid tiers, but Teamflect bundles them in at zero cost.
Teamflect subscription plans
Plan | Price | Notes |
|---|---|---|
Starter (Free) | $0.00 per user per month | Up to 10 users, all core features including OKRs, reviews, feedback, surveys, recognition |
Essential | $7.00 per user per month* | AI Agent (limited), Power BI analytics, data export, assigned CSM, free implementation |
Professional | $11.00 per user per month* | Unlimited AI Agent, succession planning, HRIS integration, API, team-level reports |
*billed annually
When comparing dollar-for-dollar, Tability is $1.00 cheaper at the lowest paid tier for pure goal tracking. But Teamflect packs dramatically more functionality into its $7.00 Essential plan, including a dedicated CSM and free implementation that Tability reserves for Enterprise contracts.
Teamflect wins on pricing. Its free plan covers twice as many users and includes features that Tability charges for, making it the better starting point for budget-conscious teams.
Tability's standalone workspace gives goals room to breathe
Tability loads as a full-screen web application with a compact sidebar for navigating plans, strategy maps, channels, and people. The layout is intentionally sparse, which keeps attention on goals rather than chrome.
My first session with Tability felt productive within minutes. The search bar, plan editor, and check-in flow required no tutorial, and the visual hierarchy made it clear where to focus.
Teamflect operates entirely within Microsoft Teams panels and tabs. For organizations that already spend their day in Teams, this eliminates context switching and removes the need for a separate login.
The trade-off is screen real estate. Teams' panel-based layout constrains how much goal context you can see at once, and navigating between modules (goals, reviews, feedback) can feel cramped when managing more than a handful of objectives.
Tability wins on user interface. Its dedicated workspace provides a cleaner, more spacious experience for managing goals, while Teamflect sacrifices visibility for the convenience of staying inside Teams.
Tability brings methodology depth that Teamflect's goal module lacks
Tability's plan editor includes an OKR quality score that acts as a real-time writing coach. As you draft an objective, the score updates live, flagging vague language, missing owners, or key results that lack clear metrics. The result is that teams catch framing mistakes during creation rather than discovering them weeks later in a review.
A strategy map view shows how individual Key Results roll up across teams, and initiatives with kanban boards connect daily execution to strategic outcomes. The combination of goal tracking and visual alignment gives managers a clear line of sight from quarterly targets to weekly tasks.
Teamflect supports cascading goals at individual, departmental, and organizational levels. Goals can be created from Teams chat messages, and the new preset templates let admins standardize how objectives are written across the company.
I appreciated how natural it felt to create a goal mid-conversation in Teams. But Teamflect lacks strategy visualization, OKR quality feedback, and KPI tracking, which limits its usefulness for teams that want to mature their goal-setting practice beyond basic tracking.
Tability wins on OKR and goal management. Its quality scoring, AI-driven coaching, and strategy map give it meaningful depth for teams that treat goal setting as a discipline rather than a checkbox.
Tability's built-in dashboards outperform Teamflect's Power BI dependency
Tability surfaces a Net Confidence Score -- a single number that captures how the team collectively feels about hitting their targets. That metric alone replaced five minutes of manual status aggregation in my weekly syncs. Drilling deeper, the Trends dashboard charts confidence shifts and Key Result completion rates over time, making it easy to spot when momentum stalls.
On the Premium plan, AI retrospectives automatically distill a full quarter of weekly check-ins into a narrative summary with clear takeaways, which saved me hours of prep before planning sessions. Custom dashboards, presentation mode, and TV mode round out the package for teams that need to broadcast progress on office screens or walk through results in meetings.
Teamflect provides preset usage analytics on the Essential plan, with team-level reports unlocked on Professional. For anything beyond the built-in views, organizations need a Power BI connector and a separate Power BI license.
The scope of Teamflect's reporting is broader, covering reviews, feedback, and recognition alongside goals. But the inability to customize dashboards natively and the 3-to-5-hour data refresh lag mean real-time executive reporting requires both extra cost and extra tooling.
Tability wins on reporting. Its native custom dashboards and AI retrospectives deliver actionable insights out of the box, while Teamflect outsources deep analytics to Power BI at additional cost.
Teamflect's people management suite goes far beyond goal tracking
Tability keeps its feature set tightly anchored to the question "is this goal moving forward?" Every key result can spawn linked initiatives that live on a kanban board, so the jump from quarterly target to weekly task happens inside the same tool. Async standups (available on Premium) collect brief daily or weekly updates from each team member without scheduling a meeting, feeding directly into the check-in history.
The Tabby AI Coach sits on top of this workflow, analyzing progress patterns and surfacing specific suggestions -- like flagging a key result that has not received an update in two weeks. It is a deliberately narrow toolset. Organizations that need performance reviews, engagement surveys, or peer recognition will need to pair Tability with separate systems.
Teamflect bundles a full performance management stack. Customizable review cycles with automated scheduling, 360-degree feedback with anonymous options, engagement surveys with AI-generated summaries, recognition badges with a points-based rewards catalog, task management synced with Microsoft Planner, and a 9-box talent grid for succession planning.
I was surprised by how many HR functions Teamflect fits inside a single Teams panel. Career pathing, individual development plans, and an employee intranet round out a platform that replaces three or four standalone tools for mid-sized teams.
Teamflect wins decisively on additional features. Its breadth of people management capabilities eliminates the need for separate review, feedback, and recognition tools that Tability's focused approach requires.
Tability connects to more tool categories, Teamflect goes deeper into Microsoft
Tability integrates with Slack, Jira, Asana, ClickUp, Linear, Notion, Google Sheets, Amplitude, HubSpot, Power BI, and Tableau, plus Zapier for custom automations.
Teamflect integrates natively with Microsoft Teams, Outlook, Planner, To Do, Entra ID, Power BI, Power Automate, and connects to 200+ HRIS platforms on the Professional plan.
Tability covers a wider range of project management, data source, and BI tool categories. Teamflect provides deeper connectivity within the Microsoft ecosystem and stronger HRIS coverage.
For organizations running a mixed tech stack, Tability's breadth is more practical. For Microsoft-first companies that also need HRIS sync, Teamflect's depth is the better fit.
Tability wins for teams with diverse tool stacks. Teamflect wins for organizations where Microsoft 365 and HRIS connectivity are the primary integration needs.
Teamflect includes a CSM on every paid plan
Tability provides email and in-app chat support during business hours on the Basic plan, with 24/7 coverage on Premium and a dedicated CSM reserved for Enterprise customers.
Teamflect assigns a dedicated customer success manager and provides free implementation support on every paid plan starting at $7.00 per user per month, including unlimited training sessions.
My experience with Teamflect's onboarding support was hands-on from the first week. Tability's community Slack channel offers a different kind of access to product leadership, but it is no substitute for structured implementation guidance.
The practical difference matters most during rollout. Teamflect's included CSM and training sessions lower the barrier to successful adoption, while Tability's enterprise-tier gating means smaller teams navigate setup independently.
Teamflect wins on support. Bundling a CSM, free implementation, and unlimited training on every paid plan removes the adoption risk that Tability's tiered support model leaves in place for smaller teams.
Final call: Tability vs Teamflect
Tability is the stronger goal tracking platform in 2026. It wins on user interface, OKR management, reporting, and integration breadth, earning four of seven categories.
Teamflect is the right choice for Microsoft Teams organizations that want goals, reviews, and feedback in one place. Its generous free tier, comprehensive people management suite, and included CSM on paid plans make it a compelling package for teams that do not need a dedicated OKR workspace.
The decision hinges on what you prioritize. If your team needs focused OKR methodology support with AI coaching and real-time dashboards, Tability delivers. If your team lives in Microsoft Teams and wants to consolidate HR and goal management into a single embedded experience, Teamflect is the more practical path.
Both tools share structural constraints at scale. Teams that outgrow either option will feel the limits in the same areas.
Tability's goal architecture is fixed to a single OKR framework with no option to define custom goal types or flexible progress models for organizations running hybrid methodologies. Its reporting, while AI-enhanced, does not produce the fully configurable executive dashboards that leadership teams expect for board presentations and QBRs. And its standalone interface, though clean, lacks the enterprise-grade adoption features like guided rollouts and multi-department configuration that large organizations require. If these constraints matter, Mooncamp is worth a look.
Outgrowing Tability or Teamflect? Try Mooncamp
Tability keeps goal tracking simple but offers no path to broader strategy execution as organizations scale. Teamflect bundles many features together but locks everything behind Microsoft Teams and provides shallow goal analytics. Mooncamp bridges both gaps with a platform that scales from focused OKR programs to enterprise-wide strategy execution without forcing a trade-off between usability and depth.
Teams that need more than a basic goal tracker or a Teams-embedded checklist will find that Mooncamp provides the structural flexibility and reporting sophistication that neither Tability nor Teamflect can match.
- Built for organization-wide adoption from day one: A clean, award-winning interface that teams across every function navigate without dedicated training, removing the onboarding ceiling of Tability's power-user features and the ecosystem lock-in of Teamflect's Teams-only access.
- Goal architecture that conforms to how your organization actually works: Configure custom goal types, statuses, progress calculations, and cadences to run OKRs, Balanced Scorecards, OGSM, or any combination without being constrained to a single framework.
- Executive-ready reporting without external dependencies: Build fully customizable dashboards and charts for any audience, from weekly team syncs to quarterly board reviews, with real-time data and no Power BI license required.
- Cross-platform connectivity: Native integrations with Jira, Power BI, MS Planner, and Slack, plus the deepest Microsoft Teams integration available in any goal management tool, so your stack choice never limits your strategy workflow.
