12 best Oboard alternatives in 2026

Oboard is the most widely installed OKR plugin on the Atlassian Marketplace, with over 3,400 installs and Gold Marketplace Partner status. It lets teams set, track, and report on OKRs directly inside Jira, and also offers a standalone web app plus integrations with monday.com and Salesforce.

That deep Jira integration is Oboard's greatest strength and its most significant constraint. Managing OKRs at scale quickly becomes cumbersome: moving objectives around is clunky, the reporting is too basic for leadership reviews, and performance degrades noticeably after extended use. Organizations that outgrow the Atlassian-centric model or need presentation-ready dashboards often hit a wall.

Here are 12 alternatives that approach OKR and strategy execution differently, from lightweight goal trackers to full enterprise platforms, each with detailed features, pricing, and guidance on where they fit best.

Best Oboard alternatives at a glance

Why look for Oboard alternatives?

Oboard delivers solid Jira-native OKR tracking, but several structural limitations push teams toward dedicated alternatives as their OKR programs mature.

• Difficult to manage OKRs at scale: Reorganizing objectives is cumbersome, searching is slow, and maintaining the OKR hierarchy requires significant manual effort. This friction compounds across hundreds of OKRs and multiple teams.
• Reporting lacks depth for leadership: The available dashboards and JQL-based querying cover basics, but there are no pre-built, presentation-ready reports for QBRs, board meetings, or executive reviews. Manual data compilation defeats the purpose of having a dedicated tool.
• Locked into the Atlassian ecosystem: Despite offering a standalone web app and Salesforce/monday.com integrations, Oboard's core strength remains the Jira plugin. Participation outside the Atlassian ecosystem is difficult, making company-wide OKR adoption impractical in mixed-tooling environments.
• Performance degrades over time: Slowdowns after extended use are a recurring issue. In an OKR platform where regular check-ins drive adoption, performance problems directly undermine engagement and the long-term sustainability of the program.
• Key configuration options missing from the UI: Goal status thresholds are managed at the database level rather than through the interface, and negative targets (e.g., "reduce churn below 5%") are not supported, forcing workarounds that erode trust in the data.

12 best Oboard alternatives

1. Mooncamp

Oboard's tight coupling to Jira means that scaling OKRs beyond development teams (into marketing, sales, leadership, or cross-functional programs) quickly runs into friction. Mooncamp takes the opposite approach: it is a standalone strategy execution platform built to adapt to any organization's structure, terminology, and workflows. Instead of forcing teams into a project management plugin, Mooncamp gives every department a first-class OKR experience with the reporting depth and configuration control that Oboard lacks.

Where Oboard's dashboards require manual compilation and its configuration lives in database settings, Mooncamp provides real-time, presentation-ready reporting and full UI-level customization. Organizations that have outgrown a Jira plugin or need to bring non-technical teams into the OKR process find that Mooncamp removes the ceiling on their goal management program.

Key features

• Deep customizability: Adapts to any goal-setting framework your organization uses. Customize templates, terminology, workflows, and goal structures to match how your teams actually operate, because no two companies run OKRs the same way.
• Real-time reporting and dashboards: Mooncamp's dashboards provide real-time insights into progress and performance. Build custom views for company-wide overviews, Quarterly Business Reviews, and board presentations without the manual data compilation that plagues Oboard deployments.

• Visual alignment and strategy maps: Strategy maps and goal cascades show how every objective connects to organizational strategy, giving teams at every level visibility into how their work contributes to the bigger picture.
• Automated check-ins and progress tracking: Regular check-ins keep teams focused on what matters most, with automated reminders and structured progress updates that create a natural rhythm of execution without micromanagement.
• Intuitive design: A clean, straightforward interface that makes goal tracking accessible for admins, team leads, and view-only contributors alike. No lengthy onboarding required.
• Enterprise-grade security: Full GDPR compliance and reliable data protection for organizations with strict regulatory requirements.

Pros

• Highly flexible and customizable for any goal framework; adapts to how your organization already works rather than imposing a rigid structure
• Intuitive design with minimal learning curve; straightforward for admins, team leads, and view-only users alike
• Expert customer success team with hands-on onboarding guidance, backed by hundreds of successful rollout implementations worldwide
• Powerful real-time reporting that eliminates manual data compilation
• Deep integrations with MS Teams, Slack, Jira, Power BI, and Planner that plug into existing tech stacks

Cons

• No free plan available (free trial only)
• No native mobile app, though a progressive web app (PWA) is available
• Focused on strategy execution and goal alignment; does not include HR features like performance reviews

Pricing

• Essential: $7.00 per user per month
• Professional: $10.00 per user per month
• Enterprise: Custom pricing

Best suited for

Scale-ups and enterprises that need a standalone OKR platform with the configuration depth, reporting maturity, and cross-functional accessibility that Oboard's Jira-centric model cannot provide. Especially strong for organizations bringing non-technical teams into a unified goal management program.

User ratings

G2: 4.8/5 (based on 290+ reviews)

2. Profit.co

Profit.co is a full-suite OKR and strategy execution platform that covers the entire goal lifecycle, from planning and cascading through execution and review. It includes built-in task management, performance reviews, employee recognition, and over 100 native integrations, making it one of the most feature-rich OKR platforms on the market.

Where Oboard is anchored to Jira for task-level execution, Profit.co bundles its own task and meeting management tools directly alongside OKRs. Teams that want a single platform for both goal-setting and day-to-day work without a separate project management subscription will find more here. The tradeoff is complexity: eight different OKR views and dozens of configuration options give power users flexibility, but the learning curve is steeper than lighter alternatives.

Key features

• Self-contained task and meeting management: Handle execution work inside the same platform as your OKRs — no need for a separate project management subscription like Jira.
• AI-driven goal refinement: AI agents review your objectives and suggest improvements, helping teams write measurable key results and avoid common pitfalls.
• Employee rewards and leaderboards: A gamified recognition layer celebrates goal achievement with badges and public leaderboards, reinforcing adoption.
• Flexible OKR creation methods: Start from a quick-create form, follow a step-by-step wizard, or choose from industry-specific templates — whichever fits your team's style.

Pros

• Consolidates OKR management, task tracking, and performance reviews in one platform — no add-ons needed
• Eight distinct views (List, Gantt, Heatmap, Alignment, and more) provide unmatched visualization flexibility
• Free tier removes the barrier to entry for teams exploring OKRs for the first time
• Native mobile apps on Android, iOS, and Windows keep remote and field teams connected

Cons

• The number of features and configuration options can make initial navigation disorienting
• Power-user flexibility comes at the cost of a longer ramp-up period for new adopters
• Certain customization options are more limited than the platform's overall breadth would suggest
• Visual design in some areas could benefit from a more modern polish

Pricing

• Launch (Free): Basic OKR tracking for small teams
• Growth: $9.00 per user per month ($7.00 per user per month billed annually)
• Enterprise: Custom pricing

Best suited for

Small to large organizations wanting a full-suite OKR platform with built-in task management and performance tools. Particularly strong for teams that need mobile access and want everything in one system without relying on a separate project management tool. See also: Profit.co alternatives.

User ratings

G2: 4.7/5

3. Perdoo

Perdoo is a strategy execution platform that unifies OKRs, KPIs, strategy mapping, and performance management in a single system. It is designed to connect high-level strategic goals to everyday execution through structured check-ins and engagement tracking, giving organizations both the strategic bird's-eye view and the operational detail they need.

Oboard focuses narrowly on linking OKRs to Jira tasks, but many organizations also need to track operational KPIs alongside their strategic objectives. Perdoo addresses this gap with dedicated KPI boards that sit alongside OKR tracking, plus strategy maps that show how everything connects. For international teams, Perdoo's multi-language support (English, German, Dutch, Spanish, French) is a practical advantage over Oboard's English-centric experience.

Key features

• Strategy maps: Bird's-eye-view diagrams that trace the path from corporate strategy through team goals to individual OKRs, so every contributor understands exactly where their work fits in.
• KPI boards: Separate dashboards dedicated to operational and growth metrics, ensuring that day-to-day performance indicators get the same visibility as strategic OKRs.
• 1:1 meeting tools: Structured one-on-one meeting templates tied to goal progress, making manager conversations data-driven rather than anecdotal.
• Health dashboards: Program-level analytics showing participation rates, check-in frequency, and goal quality scores so leaders can spot and address adoption gaps early.

Pros

• Multi-language support in five languages gives it a real edge over Oboard for international organizations
• Combining OKR and KPI tracking in a single tool eliminates the need for separate operational dashboards
• The interface is intentionally simple, making it easy for teams without OKR experience to get started quickly
• Free plan lets small teams try the full workflow before making a budget decision

Cons

• The web interface significantly outpaces the mobile app in depth and polish
• Some integration behaviors can be confusing, particularly around Microsoft Teams SSO setup
• Monthly KPI update cycles can create confusion when tracking cadence does not match the reporting period
• Customization options for OKR display and progress calculation are limited

Pricing

Perdoo's pricing has three tiers, all billed per user per month. The Free plan covers up to 5 users with limited functionality. Premium costs EUR 8.00 per user per month with a 10-user minimum. Supreme runs EUR 10.00 per user per month (also 10-user minimum) and adds KPI boards, Jira integration, and custom dashboards.

Best suited for

Mid-market to large organizations that want a combined OKR and KPI platform with built-in strategy mapping. Especially strong for international teams needing multi-language support and companies that track operational metrics alongside strategic objectives. See also: Perdoo alternatives.

User ratings

G2: 4.4/5

4. Tability

Tability is a lightweight, AI-powered goal-tracking platform that makes OKR management accessible without complexity. It focuses on simplicity and intelligent automation: AI helps define and refine goals, automated check-ins keep progress visible, and one-click reporting eliminates manual compilation.

For teams frustrated by Oboard's clunky reporting and manual data gathering, Tability's instant report generation is a direct improvement. It is also platform-agnostic: instead of being tied to Jira, Tability integrates with Jira, Slack, Microsoft Teams, GitHub, Asana, ClickUp, and more. The result is a tool that works across departments without locking anyone into a single ecosystem. The tradeoff is depth: Tability is not a full project management or performance platform, so teams still need separate tools for execution work.

Key features

• Intelligent goal authoring: The AI engine reviews objectives in real time, suggesting stronger phrasing, tighter key results, and flagging gaps in measurement criteria.
• Built-in standup sequences: Daily and weekly standup prompts auto-collect progress from each team member, replacing scattered status threads with a single digest.
• Cross-team strategy views: Visual maps display how goals at every level connect, making it straightforward to trace any key result back to the company-level objective it supports.
• Instant report generation: A single click compiles goal data into stakeholder-ready reports, eliminating the manual spreadsheet work that slows down reporting cycles.

Pros

• Among the lowest-priced paid OKR tools on the market, with the Basic tier at just $4.00 per seat per month
• AI goal assistance ships with the Basic plan — no need to upgrade to a premium tier to access it
• Rolling adoption is simple: start with a small pilot group and add seats incrementally as needed
• Platform-agnostic integrations (Jira, Slack, Microsoft Teams, GitHub, Asana, ClickUp) avoid vendor lock-in

Cons

• Strictly a goal-tracking tool, so execution and task management still require a separate system
• Report and dashboard customization options trail behind more mature enterprise solutions
• Initial navigation of the web interface takes some getting used to and may feel unintuitive
• The G2 review base is still growing, which limits the breadth of publicly available user feedback

Pricing

• Free: Up to 5 seats at no cost
• Basic: $4.00 per seat per month (10 seat minimum), including core tracking and AI features
• Plus: $5.00 per seat per month, adding team management and standup automation
• Premium: $8.00 per seat per month, unlocking advanced access controls and 24/7 support

Best suited for

Small to mid-sized teams (10--200 people) looking for an affordable, AI-assisted OKR tool that is easy to adopt without heavy onboarding. A strong fit for cost-conscious organizations that want to move beyond Jira-embedded OKRs without a large investment. See also: Tability alternatives.

User ratings

G2: 4.7/5

5. Betterworks

Betterworks is an enterprise-grade performance management platform that wraps OKR goal setting into a broader cycle of continuous feedback, recognition, calibration, and development conversations. It transforms traditional annual reviews into an ongoing performance process, powered by generative AI for goal writing and intelligent nudges.

Oboard and Betterworks solve fundamentally different problems. Oboard links OKRs to Jira tasks for execution visibility; Betterworks ties OKRs to individual performance evaluations and career development. For organizations whose primary goal with OKRs is to drive performance management rather than project execution, Betterworks provides the HR infrastructure that Oboard was never designed to include. The platform's heavy performance management orientation, however, makes it less flexible for teams that simply want agile goal tracking.

Key features

• Recognition and engagement tools: Built-in peer recognition, praise feeds, and engagement pulse surveys give HR teams a window into organizational morale alongside goal data.
• Development planning: Employees link personal development objectives to company goals, creating a direct line between career growth and organizational priorities.
• Mind-map goal visualization: Interactive visual maps show how individual OKRs connect upward through team and company-level objectives, making alignment tangible.
• Multi-source feedback collection: Gather 360-degree feedback from managers, peers, and direct reports in structured cycles or on-demand, all tied to specific goals.

Pros

• Bridges the gap between OKR tracking and HR performance management that standalone goal tools leave open
• Established track record with large enterprises running deployments across thousands of employees
• Generative AI for goal drafting lowers the barrier for teams new to OKR methodology
• Native integrations with Microsoft Teams, Slack, and Outlook keep updates in everyday workflows

Cons

• Adapting the platform to bespoke organizational processes requires more configuration than expected
• Support quality varies — initial implementation support is strong, but ongoing responsiveness can drop
• The mobile experience trails the desktop version in feature completeness and usability
• New users face a steep ramp-up period, and the available training materials could be more comprehensive

Pricing

• Standard: Custom pricing (contact required)
• Enterprise: Custom pricing

Note: Betterworks uses custom pricing based on organization size and modules selected.

Best suited for

Medium to large enterprises (500+ employees) in tech and finance that need a combined performance management and OKR platform. Best for organizations where OKRs serve an HR-driven performance strategy rather than pure execution tracking. See also: Betterworks alternatives.

User ratings

G2: 4.4/5

6. Leapsome

Leapsome is an AI-powered people platform that brings OKR management, performance reviews, engagement surveys, learning, compensation, and a core HRIS into one modular system. Trusted by over 1,750 organizations, it embeds AI throughout every module at no additional cost, from generating well-structured OKRs to transforming draft feedback into clear, constructive comments.

Where Oboard offers OKR tracking as a Jira plugin with limited configurability, Leapsome provides a modular platform where organizations choose exactly the capabilities they need and expand over time. The AI-native approach is particularly relevant for teams moving away from Oboard's manual processes: instead of configuring goal thresholds in a database, Leapsome's AI automatically recommends initiatives, checks OKR quality, and generates summaries. The platform excels when OKRs need to connect to broader people operations, though the breadth of features can feel overwhelming for organizations that only want focused goal management.

Key features

• AI-assisted goal setting: Describe a strategic priority and the AI generates structured OKRs with recommended key results, automatically checking for quality and alignment with best practices.
• Expandable module system: Start with goals alone and progressively enable reviews, engagement, learning, compensation, or HRIS modules as organizational needs grow.
• Feedback transformation engine: AI takes rough manager notes and reshapes them into clear, actionable feedback during performance review cycles.
• Pulse-based engagement tracking: Run lightweight recurring surveys that feed into trend analytics and AI-generated recommendations for improving team health.

Pros

• Pay-as-you-grow module pricing lets organizations start lean and add capabilities incrementally
• AI features are included across all plans without requiring premium upgrades or per-seat AI fees
• Strong G2 scores for ease of setup and quality of customer support alongside the overall 4.8/5 rating
• Consolidating HR tools into one platform eliminates data silos between goal tracking, reviews, and engagement

Cons

• The breadth of available features creates a significant onboarding investment for teams adopting more than one or two modules
• Goal analytics and custom reporting lack the depth that dedicated OKR platforms provide
• Mobile app functionality trails behind the web experience in several areas
• The integration library is smaller than what purpose-built goal management tools typically offer

Pricing

• Per module: Starting at $3.00 per user per month per module (billed annually)
• Full platform: Ranges from $8.00 to $14.00 per user per month based on module selection

Leapsome AI is included in all plans at no extra cost. Free trial available.

Best suited for

Mid-sized to large organizations (200-5,000 employees) that want to integrate goal tracking with performance reviews, engagement surveys, and employee development in a single platform, particularly European companies requiring strong GDPR compliance. See also: Leapsome alternatives.

User ratings

G2: 4.8/5

7. WorkBoard

WorkBoard is an enterprise strategy execution platform that combines OKR management with AI-powered business reviews and organizational alignment tooling. In May 2025, WorkBoard acquired Quantive (formerly Gtmhub), bringing together two of the largest players in enterprise OKRs. The combined platform now serves major global organizations including 3M, Boeing, Cisco, and Unilever.

Oboard and WorkBoard occupy opposite ends of the OKR spectrum. Oboard is a lightweight plugin designed for team-level OKR tracking inside Jira; WorkBoard is a heavyweight enterprise platform built for CEO- and board-level strategy execution. Its AI agents (including Chief of Staff and Leadership Coach) automatically generate executive briefs, surface risks, and replace manual status meetings with intelligent updates. For large enterprises that have outgrown Oboard's reporting and need AI-driven strategy orchestration, WorkBoard represents a significant step up in capability, but also in complexity and cost.

Key features

• AI-driven coaching and nudges: Intelligent agents monitor progress patterns and proactively prompt leaders with recommendations, risk alerts, and alignment suggestions.
• Auto-generated status reports: The platform synthesizes team updates into concise briefs covering progress, blockers, and wins — no manual compilation required.
• Business review scorecards: Scorecards track plan-versus-actual performance, organized by review cadence and audience, providing structure for MBRs, QBRs, and board meetings.
• Shared key results across teams: Cross-functional workstreams let multiple teams co-own key results, making dependencies and collaboration visible organization-wide.

Pros

• Most mature AI capabilities in the OKR market, automating status reports and proactively flagging strategic risks
• Customer support quality is outstanding (rated 9.8 on G2)
• Quantive acquisition strengthens enterprise credibility and expands the customer base to include major global brands
• Microsoft Copilot integration surfaces OKRs directly within Microsoft 365 apps

Cons

• Enterprise-grade complexity creates a steep onboarding ramp for new users
• Quantive customers face transition uncertainty as products are consolidated onto one platform
• Pricing details are not published and likely require a significant enterprise-level budget
• Mobile experience lags behind the desktop product in functionality and polish

Pricing

• Standard: Custom pricing (sales engagement required)
• Enterprise: Custom pricing

WorkBoard uses bespoke enterprise pricing with no public rate card. Reach out to the vendor for a tailored quote.

Best suited for

Large enterprises (1,000+ employees) rolling out OKRs at scale, particularly organizations invested in AI-driven strategy execution and those needing executive-level reporting that Oboard's basic dashboards cannot deliver. See also: WorkBoard alternatives.

User ratings

G2: 4.7/5

8. Cascade

Cascade is the top-rated strategy execution platform on G2, designed to help organizations plan, execute, and track their strategies in a single unified system. It goes well beyond traditional OKR tracking to offer full strategic planning with initiative management, dependency mapping, and resource allocation across the entire organization.

The difference in scope between Oboard and Cascade is significant. Oboard connects team-level OKRs to Jira tasks in a bottom-up model; Cascade works top-down, starting with the complete business strategy and breaking it into objectives, metrics, and executable initiatives with milestones. For organizations where OKRs are part of a larger strategic planning process and not just a way to track engineering output, Cascade provides the broader strategic context. The premium pricing ($24–$29 per user per month) reflects this enterprise scope and may be excessive for teams that need only focused OKR management.

Key features

• Top-down strategy decomposition: Start with the full business strategy and progressively break it into objectives, metrics, initiatives, and milestones with clear ownership at each level.
• Dependency and risk mapping: A consolidated view of all cross-organizational dependencies, blockers, and risks, enabling leaders to reallocate resources and cut unnecessary work before it stalls progress.
• Unified metrics hub: Aggregate business KPIs from Jira, Power BI, Tableau, spreadsheets, and other systems into one platform so strategic decisions are grounded in current data.
• Collaborative strategy reviews: Real-time dashboards with sharing and commenting features designed for stakeholder reviews and cross-functional progress discussions.

Pros

• Holds the top G2 rating for strategy execution platforms, with a 4.8/5 score reflecting strong user satisfaction
• A free plan covering up to 4 users with unlimited plans and metrics offers a genuine evaluation period
• Goes well beyond OKR tracking with robust strategic planning, visualization, and initiative management
• Connects to a wide range of tools including Jira, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Tableau, Power BI, and Asana

Cons

• At $24--$29 per user per month, it costs considerably more than purpose-built OKR tools
• Occasional sluggish performance and missing features in larger deployments have been reported
• Dashboard capabilities are strong, but report customization options remain limited
• The breadth of the platform may be excessive for teams whose needs begin and end with goal tracking

Pricing

• Free: Up to 4 users with core features, unlimited plans and metrics
• Essentials: $24.00--$29.00 per user per month (annual billing; price varies with team size)
• Enterprise+: Custom pricing (includes a dedicated customer success manager)

Best suited for

Medium to large enterprises that need a full strategy execution platform going beyond OKRs. Ideal for organizations requiring initiative management, dependency tracking, and strategic planning capabilities, not just goal tracking embedded in Jira. See also: Cascade alternatives.

User ratings

G2: 4.8/5

9. Weekdone

Weekdone is a veteran OKR management platform that has been helping teams set and track goals since 2013. It combines company, department, team, and individual OKRs with weekly check-ins and automated status reports, keeping goals visible and top-of-mind through a consistent weekly rhythm.

For smaller organizations that find Oboard's Jira-centric approach too narrow and its UX too cumbersome, Weekdone offers a simpler standalone alternative with a focus on weekly execution rhythms. Its hierarchy view provides an OKR alignment tree that gives instant high-level visibility, something Oboard struggles with at scale. Weekdone also includes OKR coaching with all paid plans, which is unusual at this price point and valuable for organizations new to the framework. The simplicity that makes Weekdone approachable, however, comes at the cost of advanced features that larger enterprises need.

Key features

• Hierarchy view for OKR alignment: A tree-style visualization maps every objective from the company level down to individual contributors, making it instantly clear how goals connect and cascade.
• Weekly task planning: Employees link their weekly priorities directly to team-level OKRs, ensuring day-to-day work stays tightly coupled with quarterly objectives.
• Automated status reporting: Progress data is compiled into weekly and quarterly reports automatically, giving leaders a comprehensive view without anyone chasing updates.
• Multi-tier goal ownership: Objectives and key results can be assigned at the company, department, team, or personal level with explicit ownership and clear accountability.

Pros

• A free plan (up to 3 users) gives small teams a no-commitment sandbox to learn the OKR framework
• Coaching from OKR specialists is included with every paid subscription — a differentiator few competitors match at this price
• The interface prioritizes simplicity, letting teams adopt the tool in hours rather than weeks
• A proven track record stretching back to 2013 means the methodology is well-refined

Cons

• The goal-setting framework can feel inflexible, with limited ability to tailor structures to non-standard workflows
• Performance degrades noticeably on dashboards tracking a high volume of OKRs
• The simplicity that attracts small teams becomes a ceiling for enterprises needing deeper capabilities
• Recent product development and community engagement have been relatively quiet

Pricing

• Free: Up to 3 users
• Paid: Starting at approximately $9.00--$10.00 per user per month, tiered by the number of users on the account

Note: OKR coaching is included in all paid plans.

Best suited for

Small teams and startups (3-50 employees) that need lightweight weekly goal tracking with built-in OKR coaching, particularly teams new to the framework that want an affordable, guided entry point. See also: Weekdone alternatives.

User ratings

G2: 4.5/5

10. Inspire Software

Inspire Software is a unified strategy execution and performance platform that combines OKRs, strategic planning, performance reviews, feedback, recognition, and leadership development in one system. What sets it apart is embedded content from recognized leadership frameworks (Ken Blanchard, FranklinCovey, and DISC) woven directly into OKR and performance workflows.

Oboard is a pure OKR tracking tool with no performance or development layer. Inspire Software addresses a fundamentally different need: organizations that want their OKR program to drive not just goal achievement but also manager growth and leadership capability. The built-in coaching content is unique in the market and adds practical value for companies investing in management development alongside strategy execution. The platform's breadth, however, can feel excessive for teams that only need focused OKR tracking without the performance and development layers.

Key features

• Unified OKR and goal management: AI-assisted OKR creation and alignment with benchmarking, and vertical and horizontal alignment.
• Real-time dashboards: Track performance and surface risks early with dashboards that provide organization-wide visibility.
• Performance reviews and 360-degree feedback: AI-powered feedback crafting with full review cycles tied directly to strategic goals and OKRs.
• Built-in leadership development: Integrated content from recognized leadership frameworks to support manager growth alongside goal execution.

Pros

• Consolidating OKR, performance management, and engagement into one platform eliminates the need for multiple separate subscriptions
• Leadership development content woven into daily workflows is a differentiator that no other OKR tool in this list provides
• Customer support is consistently highlighted as responsive and genuinely committed to helping teams succeed
• Pricing is competitive when compared to enterprise alternatives like WorkBoard or Leapsome

Cons

• The platform's breadth across OKR, performance, and development can feel overwhelming for teams that simply want focused goal tracking
• A smaller user base translates to fewer community-contributed templates, guides, and peer benchmarks
• The volume of features is excessive when the primary requirement is core OKR functionality
• Brand recognition is lower than established names like Betterworks or Leapsome, which can affect enterprise procurement decisions

Pricing

• Standard: Custom pricing (contact required)

Note: Free demo and free trial available. Features are bundled rather than priced per module.

Best suited for

Mid-market organizations (100--1,000 employees) that want OKRs, performance management, and leadership development in a single platform. Ideal for companies that see OKRs not just as a goal-tracking exercise but as a lever for developing stronger managers and leaders.

User ratings

G2: 4.7/5

11. Peoplebox

Peoplebox is a unified OKR and performance management platform that stands out for its deep Slack and Microsoft Teams integration. Teams can complete performance reviews, engagement surveys, and OKR check-ins entirely within their communication tools, with no context switching. The platform serves companies like Disney, Khatabook, and Razorpay.

Oboard integrates OKRs into Jira for project-management-centric teams; Peoplebox integrates OKRs into Slack and Microsoft Teams for communication-centric teams. Both solve the "where do OKR updates happen" problem, but from different angles. For organizations where Slack or Teams is the primary workspace and Jira is limited to engineering, Peoplebox brings OKR management to the tool everyone already uses daily. Automated progress tracking from over 50 integrations (including Jira, Salesforce, and HubSpot) eliminates the manual updates that Oboard requires.

Key features

• Automated OKR tracking: Real-time progress updates pulled automatically from 50+ native integrations including Jira, Salesforce, and HubSpot.
• Deep Slack/Teams integration: Complete OKR check-ins, performance reviews, and engagement surveys entirely within Slack or Microsoft Teams.
• Single-page OKR view: All company OKRs, tasks, progress reports, and charts visible on a single page for instant orientation.
• Goal-based 360 reviews: Performance reviews tied directly to OKR progress with custom weightage, calibration, and 9-box grid analysis.

Pros

• The Slack and Teams integration extends beyond notifications into full workflow execution, a depth unmatched in the category
• Connecting 50+ tools for automatic progress tracking removes the manual update burden that slows OKR adoption
• Transparent tier structure from $7 to $15 per user per month makes budgeting straightforward
• Recognized with a G2 Best Software Award in the Productivity and Collaboration category

Cons

• The number of required fields during goal creation can make the interface feel busy
• UI design is mixed — visually overwhelming in places despite the platform's ease-of-use recognition
• The platform is still building its track record compared to longer-established competitors
• Breadth across OKR and HR/talent management features could limit the depth available in each individual area

Pricing

• Talent Management: $7.00 per user per month
• OKR Platform: $8.00--$10.00 per user per month
• Full Suite Professional: $12.00 per user per month
• Premium: $15.00 per user per month (includes dedicated CSM)

Note: Enterprise custom pricing available. Minimum annual contract of $4,000.

Best suited for

Fast-growing mid-market companies (50--1,000 employees) that are heavy Slack or Microsoft Teams users and want OKR management embedded directly in their communication workflow rather than inside a project management tool like Jira.

User ratings

G2: 4.5/5

12. OKR for Jira

OKR for Jira, developed by Digital Toucan (now part of Appfire, a Platinum Atlassian Marketplace Partner), is Oboard's closest direct competitor on the Atlassian Marketplace. It provides objective tracking, key result management, and progress visualization directly within Jira Cloud, with Cloud Fortified certification for security and reliability.

For teams that want to stay within the Jira ecosystem but are dissatisfied with Oboard's UX friction or pricing at scale, OKR for Jira offers a leaner alternative with a cleaner interface. Its pricing is notably competitive: at scale (250+ users), costs drop to $0.25–$0.35 per user per month, significantly less than Oboard. The tradeoff is feature depth: OKR for Jira does not offer a standalone platform, multi-platform connectivity (no Salesforce or monday.com integration), or a public API for custom integrations. It is a pure Jira-native OKR plugin: simpler and cheaper, but more limited.

Key features

• Jira-native OKR tracking: Create objectives, add key results, and connect them to Jira issues to automatically track how daily work supports company and team-level OKRs.
• Hierarchy and alignment view: Visualize OKR alignments across the organization with dedicated hierarchy views and team-level statistics dashboards.
• Progress tracking with trend lines: Live updates on team progress with trend lines, status updates, and early risk identification.
• Cloud Fortified status: Certified for security, reliability, and support standards on the Atlassian platform.

Pros

• Very competitive pricing, especially at scale (cheaper than Oboard for large organizations)
• Cloud Fortified certification provides confidence in security and reliability
• Part of the Appfire ecosystem, which brings resources and development momentum
• Strong growth trajectory and dedicated onboarding for 100+ user companies

Cons

• Smaller install base (1,000+ companies vs. Oboard's 3,400+) means fewer community resources
• English-only language support
• No public API available, limiting custom integrations and data export
• No standalone platform; requires Jira as the foundation

Pricing

• Up to 10 users: $1.00 per month (flat fee)
• 11--100 users: $1.00 per user per month
• 101--250 users: $0.45 per user per month
• 251+ users: $0.25--$0.35 per user per month

Best suited for

Jira Cloud teams (any size) looking for a simpler, more affordable alternative to Oboard that stays entirely within the Atlassian ecosystem. Particularly strong for cost-conscious organizations with large user counts where per-user pricing matters at scale.

User ratings

Atlassian Marketplace: 3.88/4

How to choose the best Oboard alternative for your team?

Switching from Oboard is not just about finding a better OKR tool. It is about finding the right tool for how your organization actually works. These considerations will help narrow down the list.

1. Determine whether you need to stay in Jira

The most fundamental decision is whether your next OKR tool should remain inside the Atlassian ecosystem. If Jira is non-negotiable, OKR for Jira is the closest like-for-like replacement. But if you are looking beyond Jira-embedded tracking because non-engineering teams need access or because you need richer reporting, a standalone platform like Mooncamp, Perdoo, or Cascade opens up more possibilities.

2. Identify the specific pain that is driving the switch

Different Oboard limitations point to different alternatives. If limited reporting is the primary frustration, prioritize tools with presentation-ready dashboards (Mooncamp, Cascade, WorkBoard). If the UX friction at scale is the issue, focus on platforms praised for intuitive design (Mooncamp, Tability, Weekdone). If the Atlassian lock-in is the constraint, any standalone platform resolves it.

3. Match the tool to your OKR program's maturity

Teams just starting with OKRs benefit from built-in coaching and simple interfaces. Weekdone and Tability excel here. Organizations with mature OKR practices need deep customization, advanced reporting, and flexible alignment views, where Mooncamp, WorkBoard, and Cascade are better fits. Adopting an enterprise platform too early creates unnecessary complexity; staying on a beginner tool too long creates frustrating limitations.

4. Evaluate total cost beyond the subscription price

Oboard's Jira plugin pricing looks inexpensive on paper, but factor in the manual effort of compiling reports, the time spent working around UX limitations, and the cost of low adoption due to performance issues. A tool that costs more per seat but saves hours of manual work and drives higher engagement may deliver better ROI. Compare Tability's $4.00 per seat against Cascade's $24.00+ per seat: both serve valid but very different needs.

5. Test with a real OKR cycle, not a demo walkthrough

Most platforms offer free trials or free tiers. Use them with actual objectives and key results from an in-progress cycle rather than sample data. Pay attention to how check-in workflows feel in practice, how reporting works with real data, and whether the alignment views make sense with your organizational hierarchy. Mooncamp, Profit.co, Perdoo, Tability, and Weekdone all offer free trials or free plans for this purpose.

6. Check integration depth with your existing stack

Oboard's strength is deep Jira integration; your replacement tool needs to plug into whatever tools your teams use daily. If Slack is central to your workflow, Peoplebox offers the deepest integration. If Microsoft 365 is the backbone, WorkBoard's Copilot agent is relevant. If you use a mix of Jira, Power BI, and Teams, check that the new tool supports all three without compromise.

7. Assess reporting capabilities for your actual audience

Oboard's reporting gaps are one of the most common reasons teams look elsewhere. But "better reporting" means different things depending on the audience. Leadership wants presentation-ready QBR dashboards. Team leads want real-time progress views. HR wants engagement and adoption metrics. Map your reporting needs to specific tool capabilities. Mooncamp and Cascade excel at executive dashboards, while Leapsome and Peoplebox offer engagement analytics.

8. Involve stakeholders outside the initial evaluation team

OKR tools fail when only one department evaluates and selects them. Oboard's Jira-centric model often means engineering chose the tool, but marketing, sales, and leadership struggle with it. Bring representatives from every department into the evaluation early. Their workflow requirements, reporting needs, and tool preferences will surface constraints that no feature comparison can predict.

Conclusion

The right Oboard replacement depends on what specifically is holding your team back. If the core problem is Jira lock-in, any standalone platform will be an improvement. If the issue is reporting depth, you need a tool with real-time dashboards and custom views. If the UX at scale is driving low adoption, prioritize intuitiveness and simplicity. The best alternative is the one that directly addresses the pain points your organization actually experiences, not the one with the longest feature list.

Before committing to a new platform, run a structured pilot with two or three shortlisted tools. Use real OKRs from a current cycle, involve both power users and occasional contributors, and explicitly test the scenarios where Oboard fell short: compiling a leadership report, onboarding a non-technical team, reorganizing objectives mid-quarter. A two-week pilot with real data will tell you more than months of demo calls and feature comparisons.

If you are looking for a platform that combines deep customization, intuitive design, and presentation-ready reporting without locking you into a single ecosystem, Mooncamp is built for exactly this. Start a free trial and see how it handles the workflows where Oboard held you back.

Frequently asked questions