Tability vs Workpath: Which is better in 2026?

The OKR software market splits sharply between tools built for speed and tools built for scale.

Tability represents the fast-adoption end of that spectrum: a goal-tracking product designed by ex-Atlassians to turn weekly check-ins into a repeatable habit.

Workpath sits at the opposite pole, offering a modular outcome management system backed by AI agents and built for enterprise organizations with hundreds of goals running in parallel.

The question is whether your team needs a tool that gets everyone tracking goals by Friday, or one that models how those goals connect to business outcomes across an entire organization.

I tested both platforms across seven categories to answer that question, plus a bonus pick for teams that outgrow either option.

What's new in Tability?

Tability rolled out AI-powered retrospectives in spring 2025, automatically summarizing weekly check-ins into quarterly insights with actionable next steps. The feature eliminates the manual work of sifting through months of status updates before a planning cycle.

In January 2026, Tability introduced updated pricing tiers for new customers, setting Basic at $6.00 per user per month and Premium at $10.00 per user per month on annual billing. Existing customers are grandfathered until July 2026.

What's new in Workpath?

Workpath launched its AI Agent Hub in 2025, introducing four specialized agent roles that handle everything from drafting OKRs with organizational context to detecting KPI risks and preparing executive-ready summaries. An accompanying AI Bootcamp helps leaders design custom agents without writing code.

The company also introduced a Viva Goals Migration Program in 2025, offering free migration support for enterprises transitioning after Microsoft sunset Viva Goals. This positioned Workpath as a primary landing spot for large European organizations needing a replacement.

Tability vs Workpath — in a nutshell

Tability is a goal-tracking product that prizes rapid setup and weekly rhythm. Workpath is a modular outcome management platform that maps how goals cascade through enterprise structures.

The practical difference shows up on day one. Tability can have a team running check-ins within hours; Workpath requires upfront configuration of modules, impact chains, and reporting hierarchies before it delivers its full value.

Here is how the two stack up across key dimensions, with Mooncamp included as a third reference point.

Tability starts at half the cost, with zero contract obligations

Tability keeps pricing simple. Two published tiers, no minimum seats, and a 14-day free trial that gives teams enough time to evaluate the product before committing a dollar.

The Basic plan at $6.00 per user per month (annual) covers AI goal setting, check-ins, strategy maps, cascading, initiatives with kanban, reports, and Slack integration. The Premium plan at $10.00 per user per month (annual) unlocks free read-only seats (two per paid user), custom dashboards, automated check-ins, AI retrospectives, SAML SSO, and the full integration library.

I appreciated that Tability lets you pay monthly without penalty, with only a $1.00 to $2.00 premium over annual rates and no contract lock-in at any tier.

Tability subscription plans

Workpath uses a modular pricing model denominated in euros. The Essential plan starts at $7.00 per user per month (approximately EUR 7) for a single module, while the Professional plan at approximately $10.00 per user per month adds multiple modules and advanced analytics.

All plans require a minimum one-year contract, with annual billing discounts ranging from 10% to 15%. Viewer licenses are unlimited and free across every plan, which is a strong advantage for organizations where many stakeholders need read access.

Enterprise pricing is custom and requires a sales conversation. Workpath also offers a 14-day free trial and a 3-to-4-month proof-of-value option for organizations that want a structured pilot.

Workpath subscription plans

Tability wins on cost transparency. Published USD rates, monthly billing flexibility, and no contractual commitment make it the safer starting point, even though Workpath's unlimited viewer seats offer a genuine perk for read-heavy enterprises.

Tability's focused interface gets teams productive faster

Tability's interface is organized around a compact sidebar: search, messaging, plans, strategy map, channels, and people. The goal detail view surfaces progress charts, a check-in feed with threaded comments, alignment context, and a task list on a single screen.

I was tracking a set of quarterly OKRs within 20 minutes of creating my account. The layout removes decisions about where to click next because the workflow is essentially linear: create a plan, add goals, run check-ins, review progress.

The trade-off is that once a team outgrows this linear flow, customization options are limited. There is no way to reshape the navigation to match an organization's specific operating cadence.

Workpath's navigation reflects its enterprise scope, with a sidebar spanning Home, Conversations, AI Companion, Check-ins, Workspaces, Goal Graph, Goal Explorer, Reporting Hub, and Analytics. Each section opens into its own dense workspace.

The AI Companion panel is a standout detail, providing inline guidance on OKR best practices and contextual suggestions as you work. For new users at large organizations, this embedded coaching layer reduces the need to switch to external documentation.

The downside is that navigating between these sections requires familiarity, and Workpath has no mobile app. For managers who want to do a quick status check from their phone, the desktop-only experience is a real gap.

Workpath models strategic impact; Tability tracks goals and moves on

Tability's plan editor lets you add objectives, key results, and initiatives in a clean outline format. The built-in OKR quality score evaluates four dimensions that predict whether a goal will actually drive behavior: whether the objective is narrow enough to focus effort, whether the language is concrete enough to be understood across teams, whether key results have metrics attached, and whether a clear owner exists. The score gives authors a reason to tighten their drafts before sharing goals with their team.

AI-assisted goal creation generates a full plan structure from a brief prompt, which is useful for teams adopting OKRs for the first time. The strategy map view shows how plans connect across the organization without requiring manual relationship mapping.

Weekly check-ins with confidence ratings (on track, at risk, off track) form the core accountability loop. I found the five-minute check-in rhythm genuinely effective at keeping goals visible without turning into administrative overhead.

Workpath structures goals and OKRs through interconnected modules. Goals, KPIs, Initiatives, and Resources each live in their own module but link through impact chains that trace the path from team-level inputs through outputs to organizational outcomes.

The Goal Explorer lets users filter by confidence level, collaborator, label, and organizational level, surfacing misalignments that would be invisible in a simpler tool. The contribution request system formalizes cross-team dependencies, ensuring that commitments made during planning are tracked through execution.

Workpath supports OKRs, KPIs, Balanced Scorecards, and SAFe/PI planning within the same system. For enterprises running multiple strategic frameworks across divisions, this eliminates the need to force every team into a single methodology.

Workpath's analytics suite is built for boardroom presentations

Tability splits reporting into two tiers. Every user gets a Trends dashboard with Key Result progress charts and a confidence timeline that makes it obvious when a goal is drifting. The Net Confidence Score -- an aggregate of how the team rates its own likelihood of hitting targets -- gives leadership a pulse-check metric they can track across planning cycles.

Premium unlocks the features that distinguish Tability from simpler trackers. Custom dashboards let different stakeholders see the slices of data that matter to them, while AI retrospectives pull together every check-in from a quarter and produce a written analysis with patterns, risks, and suggested next steps. Presentation mode formats dashboards for meeting walkthroughs, and TV mode keeps goal status visible on shared office screens. CSV, PDF, and public link exports cover the remaining sharing needs.

The retrospective feature stood out during my testing. Instead of scrolling through twelve weeks of incremental updates before a planning session, I got a structured narrative that surfaced the themes I would have spent an hour assembling manually.

Workpath's Cycle Steering dashboard organizes reporting into Planning, Execution, and Adoption and Engagement tabs, giving leadership a multi-dimensional view of strategic health. Metrics like "teams with strategies," "teams steering with KPIs," and "teams collaborating" measure not just goal progress but organizational engagement with the strategy process itself.

The platform auto-pulls KPI data from Power BI and other connected sources, which Workpath claims reduces manual report consolidation by up to 40%. Automated business review preparation generates executive-ready presentations that would otherwise require hours of manual assembly.

Impact chain analytics trace execution from individual initiatives through to business results. For enterprises where the connection between team activity and organizational outcomes is opaque, this traceability is the core value proposition.

Workpath extends into strategy operations; Tability stays lean by design

Tability's day-to-day workflow ties planning to execution in a single loop. You set a quarterly objective, break it into key results, then spin up initiatives on a kanban board to track the actual work that moves each metric. When a task is completed, its impact is visible on the parent key result without switching tools.

Async standups layer a lightweight accountability rhythm on top of this loop. Team members post brief daily or weekly written updates -- what they did, what is next, what is blocked -- and the history feeds into AI-generated retrospectives at quarter-end. The Tabby AI Coach monitors all of this passively, surfacing suggestions when progress stalls or a goal's quality score drops.

The trade-off is clear: Tability covers goal tracking and execution coordination but stops there. Teams that need performance reviews, engagement surveys, or resource allocation will need separate platforms.

Workpath extends into territory that most OKR tools leave untouched. The AI Agent Hub gives enterprise leaders pre-built agents for strategy consulting, chief-of-staff workflows, market analysis, and PMO operations, while the Business Review module structures quarterly planning into data-driven sessions.

The Workpath Academy provides trainer-led workshops, masterclasses, and a self-paced curriculum that includes an OKR Coach Certificate. Resource management tracks team capacity based on strategic value, helping organizations allocate effort toward high-impact initiatives.

These capabilities transform Workpath from a goal tracker into a strategy operations platform. The trade-off is that teams who only need basic OKR tracking end up paying for and navigating around features they will never use.

Tability covers more of the modern SaaS stack

Tability connects to a wide range of tools across project management (Jira, Asana, ClickUp, Linear, monday.com, Trello, Shortcut), communication (Slack, Microsoft Teams), documentation (Notion, Confluence, Miro), data sources (Google Sheets, Amplitude, ChartMogul, GitHub, GitLab, PostgreSQL), and BI (Power BI, Tableau).

Workpath focuses on enterprise-grade connectors: MS Teams, Jira, Azure DevOps, Power BI, Excel Online, Microsoft Planner, plus deep HRIS integrations with Workday, SAP SuccessFactors, and Personio.

Tability's breadth means most startup-to-midmarket tech stacks are covered natively, while Workpath's depth gives Microsoft-centric and SAP-centric environments tighter connectivity where it counts.

The practical difference: teams relying on modern project management and developer tools will find Tability's native connectors eliminate the need for middleware, whereas organizations prioritizing HRIS and ERP integration will favor Workpath's enterprise connectors.

Workpath's Academy and consulting model serve complex rollouts

Tability offers business-hours support on the Basic plan, 24/7 availability on Premium, and a dedicated Customer Success Manager on Enterprise.

Workpath provides dedicated onboarding managers, customer success managers, change-management workshops, the Workpath Academy (workshops, masterclasses, train-the-trainer programs), consulting services, and a certified partner ecosystem.

Workpath's model is designed for organizations where the software rollout is part of a broader strategic transformation, while Tability's model suits self-directed teams that need responsive answers without overhead.

I found Tability's documentation sufficient for getting started independently, but Workpath's structured enablement programs would be essential for a 500-person deployment where adoption is the primary risk.

Final call: Tability vs Workpath

Workpath is the stronger platform in this comparison, winning 4 of 7 categories. Its outcome management architecture, enterprise analytics, AI agent ecosystem, and strategic support services put it in a different weight class for organizations with 500+ employees.

Tability earns clear wins on pricing, user interface, and integrations. For teams under 200 people that want to build a goal-tracking habit without a multi-month implementation, Tability delivers immediate value at a fraction of the cost.

The right choice depends on organizational scale. If your team can adopt a tool within a week, pick Tability; if your organization needs to model strategic impact across divisions and present results to a board, Workpath justifies the investment.

Neither tool is a poor choice. Both solve the core problem of making goals visible and trackable, with the difference being how far beyond that core each platform reaches.

Outgrowing Tability or Workpath? Try Mooncamp

Tability caps out when organizations need more than linear goal tracking and pre-set reporting, while Workpath delivers enterprise depth but wraps it in configuration complexity that slows adoption. Mooncamp is built for teams that want both: strategic depth without sacrificing the speed of rollout.

• Designed for fast, broad adoption: A clean, modern interface that teams across every department start using productively on their first day, without the ramp-up time that Workpath's modular navigation demands or the depth limitations that Tability imposes.
• Goal architecture shaped by your organization: Custom goal types, statuses, fields, progress models, and cadences let you run OKRs, Balanced Scorecards, OGSM, or any hybrid framework without forcing your process into a predefined structure.
• Reporting built for every level of the organization: Fully customizable dashboards and charts that deliver team-level check-in summaries and board-level strategic overviews from the same platform, without requiring a separate analytics configuration.
• Enterprise-grade connectivity: Native integrations with Jira, Power BI, MS Planner, and Slack, plus the most advanced Microsoft Teams integration available in any strategy execution tool.