Weekdone vs WorkBoard: Which is better in 2026?

These two platforms sit at opposite ends of the OKR market. Weekdone is built for small teams that want a structured weekly cadence around goals, while WorkBoard targets Fortune 500 enterprises with AI-driven strategy execution.

That gap makes this comparison unusually clear-cut in some areas and surprisingly nuanced in others. Where Weekdone keeps things deliberately simple, WorkBoard layers on sophistication that not every organization actually needs.

The question is not just which tool is better, but which one matches the stage your organization is at right now. A 30-person startup and a 5,000-person enterprise have fundamentally different requirements for goal management.

I tested both platforms to evaluate their approaches across seven categories, plus a bonus pick for teams that find neither is the right fit.

What's new in Weekdone?

Weekdone added Private OKRs in 2024, allowing teams to restrict visibility on sensitive objectives to selected individuals. This is a meaningful addition for organizations handling confidential strategic initiatives.

The platform also enhanced its Initiatives tracking with due dates, progress summary graphs, and hashtag grouping. These updates make non-OKR work items easier to organize and monitor alongside quarterly objectives.

What's new in WorkBoard?

WorkBoard launched its AI Agents in May 2025, introducing a Digital Chief of Staff and Leadership Coach that proactively prepare meeting briefs, track deliverables, and coach managers on strategic alignment. The AI layer integrates with Microsoft 365 Copilot for OKR suggestions and key result updates directly inside the Microsoft ecosystem.

In the same month, WorkBoard completed its acquisition of Quantive (formerly Gtmhub), consolidating the two largest enterprise OKR platforms under one roof. Quantive customers are actively transitioning to the WorkBoard platform, significantly expanding its installed base.

Weekdone vs WorkBoard — in a nutshell

Weekdone treats OKRs as a lightweight habit built around weekly check-ins, while WorkBoard treats them as the connective tissue of enterprise strategy. The philosophical gap between them is wider than any other pairing in the OKR category.

In practice, this means Weekdone gets teams running quickly with minimal configuration, but it hits a ceiling once organizational complexity grows. WorkBoard handles that complexity natively, though it demands a proportional investment in setup and training.

Here is how the two stack up across key dimensions (with Mooncamp included as a reference point).

Weekdone's transparent pricing undercuts WorkBoard's enterprise model

Weekdone publishes its pricing openly and uses a single plan with volume-based discounts. Every feature is included at every tier, starting with a free plan for up to 3 users.

For teams of 4 to 10 people, the annual rate is $9.00 per user per month, decreasing steadily as the team grows. I appreciated being able to evaluate the full platform without scheduling a demo first.

For larger organizations (500+ users), Weekdone switches to a contact-sales model. The published pricing up to that point gives a clear sense of the cost structure.

Weekdone subscription plans

All features included at every level. 14-day free trial for 4+ users.

WorkBoard does not publish pricing on its website. The only path forward is booking a demo with sales.

Based on third-party estimates, the starting price sits around $20.00 per user per month. Enterprise deployments likely range higher depending on feature scope and scale.

This opaque model creates a significant friction point for budget-conscious teams. Without a published rate card, organizations cannot compare costs internally before committing to a sales conversation.

WorkBoard subscription plans

No public pricing available. Estimated starting price ~$20.00 per user per month based on third-party sources.

Weekdone's simplicity outpaces WorkBoard's dense interface

Weekdone's interface follows a clean sidebar layout with collapsible sections for KPIs, quarterly objectives, and initiatives. Everything a small team needs is accessible within two or three clicks.

My first session felt productive within minutes. The visual hierarchy guides attention naturally from company-level metrics down to individual objectives without requiring a tutorial.

WorkBoard's interface packs significantly more information onto every screen. The "My Briefing" view surfaces status cards for updates needed, results at risk, and alignment opportunities.

The density serves experienced users well once they learn the layout. But the initial experience is overwhelming, with more menus and data panels than most team members need for their daily work.

WorkBoard's AI and alignment depth surpass Weekdone's straightforward goal tracking

Weekdone structures goals and OKRs across company, department, and team levels with a visual alignment tree that shows how objectives cascade. The PPP framework ties daily activities to quarterly goals by asking each team member to report on Plans, Progress, and Problems weekly.

I found this weekly bridge between execution and strategy genuinely useful for keeping OKRs from becoming abstract quarterly statements. Private OKRs add discretion for sensitive initiatives.

WorkBoard approaches goal management as an enterprise discipline. AI-powered suggestions help craft well-structured OKRs, while heatmaps highlight areas of risk across the organization.

Alignment detection surfaces opportunities to connect objectives that share dependencies across business units. Draft OKR workflows with approval gates ensure quality before objectives go live.

WorkBoard's enterprise analytics leave Weekdone's basic dashboards behind

Weekdone provides overview dashboards with KPI cards, quarterly objective progress charts, and initiative summaries. Auto-generated weekly reports are distributed via email, and hashtag-based reports can be exported as PDFs.

The Company TV Dashboard mode is a nice touch for teams that want to display progress on a shared screen. But the reporting engine does not support custom views or configurable widgets.

WorkBoard's reporting centers on its Running Business Reviews, which auto-generate briefs covering objectives, key results, metrics, and dependencies. Integration with Power BI and Tableau lets organizations pull OKR data into existing analytics workflows.

I noticed that the AI-generated meeting pre-reads significantly reduce the manual preparation that typically precedes leadership reviews. Customizable business review templates adapt to different cadences and audiences.

WorkBoard's AI agents and review automation outweigh Weekdone's weekly rhythm tools

Weekdone's standout additional feature is its PPP weekly check-in framework, which creates a structured rhythm of Plans, Progress, and Problems reporting. The platform also includes an Initiatives tracker for non-OKR projects and a newsfeed for team updates and peer recognition.

I found the 1-on-1 submission workflow particularly practical for async teams. The built-in OKR Master Course rounds out a set of features focused on building and sustaining an OKR habit.

WorkBoard's additional features reflect its enterprise DNA. AI agents proactively manage strategy execution: the Digital Chief of Staff follows up on deliverables, while the Leadership Coach provides contextual guidance to managers.

Meeting management includes action items, @mentions, and auto-generated minutes. The Microsoft 365 Copilot integration brings OKR context directly into Word, Excel, and PowerPoint.

WorkBoard's 18+ connectors dwarf Weekdone's core eight

Weekdone offers 8 direct integrations including Microsoft Teams, Slack, Jira, Asana, and Zapier for extending connectivity to 1,500+ apps.

WorkBoard provides 18+ native integrations spanning Salesforce, Jira, Azure DevOps, Power BI, Tableau, Snowflake, Workday, and ServiceNow, plus strategic partnerships with Microsoft.

The gap is most visible in enterprise data sources, where WorkBoard connects natively to the BI, CRM, and HRIS tools that large organizations already rely on.

For teams that need OKR progress to update automatically from source systems, WorkBoard's connector library eliminates the manual data entry that Weekdone's smaller set cannot avoid.

Both platforms invest heavily in support, with different strengths

Weekdone includes a dedicated personal OKR Coach with every paid subscription, along with live chat, email support, team trainings, and quarterly OKR reviews at no additional cost.

WorkBoard provides 24/7 technical support, phone access, instructor-led training, and a 2-day OKR Coach Certification program that has graduated over 10,000 participants.

Weekdone's bundled coaching removes the need to hire external consultants for first-time OKR adoption, while WorkBoard's certification and professional services build internal capability at scale.

My experience is that the right choice depends entirely on organizational maturity.

Final call: Weekdone vs WorkBoard

WorkBoard wins 4 out of 7 categories in this comparison, with 1 tie. Its enterprise feature depth, AI capabilities, reporting sophistication, and integration library place it in a different tier than Weekdone for organizations operating at scale.

Weekdone is the better choice for small teams (under 50 people) adopting OKRs for the first time. Its transparent pricing, instant onboarding, and bundled coaching remove the barriers that make enterprise platforms impractical for smaller organizations.

The two tools are not really direct competitors. Weekdone serves organizations that need a lightweight weekly habit around goal tracking, while WorkBoard serves organizations that need to orchestrate strategy across thousands of employees.

If your team is somewhere in the middle, neither platform may be the right fit. That 50-to-500 employee range is where both tools show their limitations most visibly.

Outgrowing Weekdone or WorkBoard? Try Mooncamp

Weekdone caps out when organizations grow beyond small-team simplicity, and WorkBoard demands enterprise budgets and months of onboarding to deliver value. Mooncamp occupies the space between these extremes, offering strategic depth without forcing teams through a lengthy implementation process.

Where both tools lock you into a single goal-setting methodology, Mooncamp lets organizations define their own framework. Teams can run OKRs, KPIs, and custom goal types side by side, with configurable statuses, progress calculations, and cadences that adapt as strategy evolves.

• Clean, award-winning interface that teams adopt on day one. No multi-week training programs or dedicated rollout consultants needed. The design removes friction so adoption scales naturally across departments.
• Goal architecture shaped by how your organization works. Define custom goal types, statuses, and workflows to support OKRs alongside KPIs, Balanced Scorecards, or any hybrid approach your strategy requires.
• Dashboards built for every audience, not just the C-suite. Assemble fully customizable charts and reporting views that serve team leads, department heads, and executives with equal clarity.
• Enterprise-grade data connectivity with deep Microsoft Teams support. Native integrations with Jira, Power BI, MS Planner, and Slack, plus the most advanced Teams integration on the market for keeping goals visible where work happens.